Patrick Schratz

Mr. Patrick Schratz

Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2019 in Ecological Modelling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Patrick SchratzPatrick Schratz
Patrick Schratz
JMJannes Muenchow
Jannes Muenchow
EIEugenia Iturritxa
Eugenia Iturritxa
JRJakob Richter
Jakob Richter
ABAlexander Brenning
Alexander Brenning

11 December 2019 in Journal of Open Source Software
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMichel Lang
Michel Lang
MBMartin Binder
Martin Binder
JRJakob Richter
Jakob Richter
Patrick SchratzPatrick Schratz
Patrick Schratz
FPFlorian Pfisterer
Florian Pfisterer
BBBernd Bischl
Bernd Bischl

30 August 2013
Verified
Dataset
Closed access
BBBernd Bischl
Bernd Bischl
MLMichel Lang
Michel Lang
LKLars Kotthoff
Lars Kotthoff
Patrick SchratzPatrick Schratz
Patrick Schratz
JSJulia Schiffner
Julia Schiffner
MBMartin Binder
Martin Binder

17 January 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KHKai Heckel
Kai Heckel
MUMarcel Urban
Marcel Urban
Patrick SchratzPatrick Schratz
Patrick Schratz
MMMiguel D. Mahecha
Miguel D. Mahecha
CSChristiane Cornelia Schmullius
Christiane Cornelia Schmullius
The fusion of microwave and optical data sets is expected to provide great potential for the derivation of forest cover around the globe. As Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 are now both operating in twin mode, they can provide an unprecedented data source to build dense spatial and temporal high-resolution time series across a variety of wavelengths. This study investigates (i) the ability of the individual sensors and (ii) their joint potential to delineate forest cover for study sites in two highly varied landscapes located in Germany (temperate dense mixed forests) and South Africa (open savanna woody vegetation and forest plantations). We used multi-temporal Sentinel-1 and single time steps of Sentinel-2 data in combination to derive accurate forest/non-forest (FNF) information via machine-learning classifiers. The forest classification accuracies were 90.9% and 93.2% for South Africa and Thuringia, respectively, estimated while using autocorrelation corrected spatial cross-validation (CV) for the fused data set. Sentinel-1 only classifications provided the lowest overall accuracy of 87.5%, while Sentinel-2 based classifications led to higher accuracies of 91.9%. Sentinel-2 short-wave infrared (SWIR) channels, biophysical parameters (Leaf Area Index (LAI), and Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR)) and the lower spectrum of the Sentinel-1 synthetic aperture radar (SAR) time series were found to be most distinctive in the detection of forest cover. In contrast to homogenous forests sites, Sentinel-1 time series information improved forest cover predictions in open savanna-like environments with heterogeneous regional features. The presented approach proved to be robust and it displayed the benefit of fusing optical and SAR data at high spatial resolution.

28 November 2021 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Patrick SchratzPatrick Schratz
Patrick Schratz
JMJannes Muenchow
Jannes Muenchow
EIEugenia Iturritxa
Eugenia Iturritxa
JCJose Cortes
Jose Cortes
BBBernd Bischl
Bernd Bischl
Alexander BrenningAlexander Brenning
Alexander Brenning
This study analyzed highly correlated, feature-rich datasets from hyperspectral remote sensing data using multiple statistical and machine-learning methods. The effect of filter-based feature selection methods on predictive performance was compared. In addition, the effect of multiple expert-based and data-driven feature sets, derived from the reflectance data, was investigated. Defoliation of trees (%), derived from in situ measurements from fall 2016, was modeled as a function of reflectance. Variable importance was assessed using permutation-based feature importance. Overall, the support vector machine (SVM) outperformed other algorithms, such as random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and lasso (L1) and ridge (L2) regressions by at least three percentage points. The combination of certain feature sets showed small increases in predictive performance, while no substantial differences between individual feature sets were observed. For some combinations of learners and feature sets, filter methods achieved better predictive performances than using no feature selection. Ensemble filters did not have a substantial impact on performance. The most important features were located around the red edge. Additional features in the near-infrared region (800–1000 nm) were also essential to achieve the overall best performances. Filter methods have the potential to be helpful in high-dimensional situations and are able to improve the interpretation of feature effects in fitted models, which is an essential constraint in environmental modeling studies. Nevertheless, more training data and replication in similar benchmarking studies are needed to be able to generalize the results.

1 January 2017 in The R Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JMJannes Muenchow
Jannes Muenchow
Patrick SchratzPatrick Schratz
Patrick Schratz
ABAlexander Brenning
Alexander Brenning