Norbert Bornfeld

Dr. Norbert Bornfeld

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 May 2003
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FTFrank Tschentscher
Frank Tschentscher
JHJohannes Hüsing
Johannes Hüsing
THTanja Hölter
Tanja Hölter
EKElisabeth Kruse
Elisabeth Kruse
IDIrina Gana Dresen
Irina Gana Dresen
MZMichael Zeschnigk
Michael Zeschnigk

16 February 2018 in Deutsches Ärzteblatt international
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NBNorbert Bornfeld
Norbert Bornfeld
EBEva Biewald
Eva Biewald
SBSebastian Bauer
Sebastian Bauer
PTPetra Temming
Petra Temming
DLDietmar Lohmann
Dietmar Lohmann
MZMichael Zeschnigk
Michael Zeschnigk
Almost all types of tissues can give rise to intraocular tumors. Moreover, nearly all malignant tumors elsewhere in the body can metastasize to the eye. This review is therefore restricted to description of the most commonly occurring intraocular...

31 January 2020 in BMC Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMarietta Lieb
Marietta Lieb
STSefik Tagay
Sefik Tagay
ABAnja Breidenstein
Anja Breidenstein
THTobias Hepp
Tobias Hepp
CGClaudia Helga Dorothee Le Guin
Claudia Helga Dorothee Le Guin
YEYesim Erim
Yesim Erim
Background: The risk of metastases in uveal melanoma can accurately be estimated through genetic analysis of the tumor. A growing number of patients decide to receive information on their prognosis, although this can be extremely burdensome. Studies on the psychosocial impact of testing are sparse. The objective of this study was to examine traits of patients opting for prognostication, to investigate its psychosocial impact and the use of psycho-oncological services over time. We further examined characteristics of patients utilizing these services and risk factors of prolonged psychological distress.Design and methods: This study is a non-randomized controlled prospective clinical observational trial. Patients availing for prognostication formed the test group, while those who opted out constituted the observational group. The psychosocial impact of genetic testing was assessed with the following variables: resilience, social support, fear of tumor progression, depression, general distress, health-related quality of life, estimation of the perceived risk, and the utilization of psycho-oncological interventions. Data were assessed at five different time points over a period of 12 months. We applied binary logistic regression analysis, multiple linear regressions and a mixed model.Results: Of 175 patients, 63 decided to obtain prognostic information. Treatment method (enucleation > brachytherapy), lower social support and higher general distress could significantly predict patient’s choice for prognostic testing. After result announcement, perceived risk of metastases was significantly increased in patients with poor prognosis, while it decreased in those with good prognosis. Overall, a significant decrease over time appeared concerning fear of progression, general distress, depression and anxiety. Mental quality of life increased over time. The utilization of psycho-oncological interventions increased significantly after prognostication; however, this was equivalent in the test and observational groups. Female sex, higher general distress and higher anxiety predicted greater use of psycho-oncological interventions.Discussion: Availing of prognostic testing is not associated with poorer subsequent psychological well-being. It rather may help to alleviate distress and promote a more realistic risk perception. However, psychological support should be available to all patients, independent of prognosis and treatment, especially considering that patients with low social support and high distress increasingly opt for prognostication.

23 March 2020 in Der Ophthalmologe
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NBNorbert Bornfeld
Norbert Bornfeld
DLD. Lohmann
D. Lohmann
NBN. E. Bechrakis
N. E. Bechrakis
EBE. Biewald
E. Biewald

13 April 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EBEva Biewald
Eva Biewald
TKTobias Kiefer
Tobias Kiefer
DGDirk Geismar
Dirk Geismar
SSSabrina Schlüter
Sabrina Schlüter
AMAnke Manthey
Anke Manthey
NBNorbert Bornfeld
Norbert Bornfeld
Despite the increased risk of subsequent primary tumors (SPTs) external beam radiation (EBRT) may be the only therapeutic option to preserve a retinoblastoma eye. Due to their physical properties, proton beam therapy (PBT) offers the possibility to use the effectiveness of EBRT in tumor treatment and to decisively reduce the treatment-related morbidity. We report our experiences of PBT as rescue therapy in a retrospectively studied cohort of 15 advanced retinoblastoma eyes as final option for eye-preserving therapy. The average age at the initiation of PBT was 35 (14–97) months, mean follow-up was 22 (2–46) months. Prior to PBT, all eyes were treated with systemic chemotherapy and a mean number of 7.1 additional treatments. Indication for PBT was non-feasibility of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) in 10 eyes, tumor recurrence after IAC in another 3 eyes and diffuse infiltrating retinoblastoma in 2 eyes. Six eyes (40%) were enucleated after a mean time interval of 4.8 (1–8) months. Cataract formation was the most common complication affecting 44.4% of the preserved eyes, yet 77.8% achieved a visual acuity of >20/200. Two of the 15 children treated developed metastatic disease during follow-up, resulting in a 13.3% metastasis rate. PBT is a useful treatment modality as a rescue therapy in retinoblastoma eyes with an eye-preserving rate of 60%. As patients are at lifetime risk of SPTs consistent monitoring is mandatory.

14 April 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMadlen Reschke
Madlen Reschke
EBEva Biewald
Eva Biewald
LBLeo Bronstein
Leo Bronstein
IBInes B. Brecht
Ines B. Brecht
SDSabine Dittner-Moormann
Sabine Dittner-Moormann
PKPetra Ketteler
Petra Ketteler
Retinoblastoma and other eye tumors in childhood are rare diseases. Many eye tumors are the first signs of a genetic tumor predisposition syndrome and the affected children carry a higher risk of developing other cancers later in life. Clinical and genetic data of all children with eye tumors diagnosed between 2013–2018 in Germany and Austria were collected in a multicenter prospective observational study. In five years, 300 children were recruited into the study: 287 with retinoblastoma, 7 uveal melanoma, 3 ciliary body medulloepithelioma, 2 retinal astrocytoma, 1 meningioma of the optic nerve extending into the eye. Heritable retinoblastoma was diagnosed in 44% of children with retinoblastoma. One child with meningioma of the optic nerve extending into the eye was diagnosed with neurofibromatosis 2. No pathogenic constitutional variant in DICER1 was detected in a child with medulloepithelioma while two children did not receive genetic analysis. Because of the known association with tumor predisposition syndromes, genetic counseling should be offered to all children with eye tumors. Children with a genetic predisposition to cancer should receive a tailored surveillance including detailed history, physical examinations and, if indicated, imaging to screen for other cancer. Early detection of cancers may reduce mortality.