The global climate is noticeably warming, and drought occurs frequently. Therefore, choosing a suitable index for drought monitoring is particularly important. The standardized precipitation index (SPI) and the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) are commonly used indicators in drought monitoring. The SPEI takes temperature into account, but the SPI does not. In the context of global warming, what are their differences and applicability in regional drought monitoring? In this study, after calculating the SPI and SPEI at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month timescales at 102 meteorological stations in Inner Mongolia from 1981 to 2018, we compared and analyzed the performances of the SPI and SPEI in drought monitoring from temporal and spatial variations, and the consistency and applicability of the SPI and SPEI were also discussed. The results showed that (1) with increasing timescale, the temporal variations in the SPI and SPEI were increasingly consistent, but there were still slight differences in the fluctuation value and continuity; (2) due to the difference in time series, the drought characteristics identified by the SPI and SPEI were quite different in space at various timescales, and with the increase in timescale, the spatial distributions of the drought trends in Inner Mongolia were basically consistent, except in Alxa; (3) at the shortest timescale, the difference between the SPI and SPEI was the largest, and the drought reflected by the SPI and SPEI may be consistent at long timescales; and (4) compared with typical drought events and vegetation indexes, the SPEI may be more suitable than the SPI for drought monitoring in Inner Mongolia. It should be noted that the adaptability of the SPI and SPEI may be different in different periods and regions, which remains to be analyzed in the future.

There are currently only two methods (the within-growing season method and the inter-growing season method) used to analyse the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)–climate relationship at the monthly time scale. What are the differences between the two methods, and why do they exist? Which method is more suitable for the analysis of the relationship between them? In this study, after obtaining NDVI values (GIMMS NDVI3g) near meteorological stations and meteorological data of Inner Mongolian grasslands from 1982 to 2015, we analysed temporal changes in NDVI and climate factors, and explored the difference in Pearson correlation coefficients (R) between them via the above two analysis methods and analysed the change in R between them at multiple time scales. The research results indicated that: (1) NDVI was affected by temperature and precipitation in the area, showing periodic changes, (2) NDVI had a high value of R with climate factors in the within-growing season, while the significant correlation between them was different in different months in the inter-growing season, (3) with the increase in time series, the value of R between NDVI and climate factors showed a trend of increase in the within-growing season, while the value of R between NDVI and precipitation decreased, but then tended toward stability in the inter-growing season, and (4) when exploring the NDVI–climate relationship, we should first analyse the types of climate in the region to avoid the impacts of rain and heat occurring during the same period, and the inter-growing season method is more suitable for the analysis of the relationship between them.

Massive desert locust swarms have been threatening and devouring natural vegetation and agricultural crops in East Africa and West Asia since 2019, and the event developed into a rare and globally concerning locust upsurge in early 2020. The breeding, maturation, concentration and migration of locusts rely on appropriate environmental factors, mainly precipitation, temperature, vegetation coverage and land-surface soil moisture. Remotely sensed images and long-term meteorological observations across the desert locust invasion area were analyzed to explore the complex drivers, vegetation losses and growing trends during the locust upsurge in this study. The results revealed that (1) the intense precipitation events in the Arabian Peninsula during 2018 provided suitable soil moisture and lush vegetation, thus promoting locust breeding, multiplication and gregarization; (2) the regions affected by the heavy rainfall in 2019 shifted from the Arabian Peninsula to West Asia and Northeast Africa, thus driving the vast locust swarms migrating into those regions and causing enormous vegetation loss; (3) the soil moisture and NDVI anomalies corresponded well with the locust swarm movements; and (4) there was a low chance the eastwardly migrating locust swarms would fly into the Indochina Peninsula and Southwest China.

Land surface soil moisture (SM) monitoring is crucial for global water cycle and agricultural dryness research. The FengYun-3C Microwave Radiation Imager (FY-3C/MWRI) collects various Earth geophysical parameters, and the FY-3C/MWRI SM product (FY-3C VSM) has been widely applied to determine regional-scale surface SM contents. The FY-3C VSM retrieval accuracy in different seasons was evaluated by calculating the root mean square error (RMSE), unbiased RMSE (ubRMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and correlation coefficient (R) values between the retrieved and measured SM. A lower accuracy in July (RMSE = 0.164 cm³/cm³, ubRMSE = 0.130 cm³/cm³, and MAE = 0.120 cm³/cm³) than in the other months was found due to the impacts of vegetation and climate variations. To show a detailed relationship between SM and multiple factors, including vegetation coverage, location, and elevation, quantile regression (QR) models were used to calculate the correlations at different quantiles. Except for the elevation at the 0.9 quantile, the QR models of the measured SM with the FY-3C VSM, MODIS NDVI, latitude, and longitude at each quantile all passed the significance test at the 0.005 level. Thus, the MODIS NDVI, latitude, and longitude were selected for error correction during the surface SM retrieval process using FY-3C VSM. Multivariate linear regression (MLR) and multivariate back-propagation neural network (MBPNN) models with different numbers of input variables were built to improve the SM monitoring results. The MBPNN model with three inputs (MBPNN-3) achieved the highest R (0.871) and lowest RMSE (0.034 cm³/cm³), MAE (0.026 cm³/cm³), and mean relative error (MRE) (20.7%) values, which were better than those of the MLR models with one, two, or three independent variables (MLR-1, -2, -3) and those of the MBPNN models with one or two inputs (MBPNN-1, -2). Then, the MBPNN-3 model was applied to generate the regional SM in the United States from January 2019 to October 2019. The estimated SM images were more consistent with the measured SM than the FY-3C VSM. This work indicated that combining FY-3C VSM data with the MBPNN-3 model could provide precise and reliable SM monitoring results.

Optical remote sensing data are used widely in many fields (such as agriculture, resource management and the environment), especially for the vast territory of China; however, the application of these data is usually limited by clouds. Although it is valuable to analyze the probability of acquiring cloud-free imagery (PACI), PACI using different sensors at the pixel level across China has not been reported. In this study, the PACI of China was calculated with daily Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) cloud mask data from 1990 to 2019. The results showed that (1) PACI varies dramatically in different regions and months in China. The value was larger in autumn and winter, and the largest figure reached 49.55% in October in Inner Mongolia (NM). In contrast, relatively small values occurred in summer, and the minimum value (5.26%) occurred in June in South China (SC). (2) As the climate changes, the PACI has increased significantly throughout the country and most regions, especially in North China (NC), with a growth rate of 1.9% per decade. The results can be used as a reference for selecting appropriate optical sensors and observation times in areas of interest.