Adam Krysztofiak

Dr. Adam Krysztofiak

Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 June 2015 in Oncotarget
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMohamed Ali Mosrati
Mohamed Ali Mosrati
AMAnnika Malmström
Annika Malmström
MLMalgorzata Lysiak
Malgorzata Lysiak
Adam KrysztofiakAdam Krysztofiak
Adam Krysztofiak
MHMartin Hallbeck
Martin Hallbeck
PSPeter Söderkvist
Peter Söderkvist
TERT promoter mutations and polymorphisms as prognostic factors in primary glioblastoma TERT promoter mutations and polymorphisms as prognostic factors in primary glioblastoma

5 April 2020 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KSKlaudia Szymonowicz
Klaudia Szymonowicz
Adam KrysztofiakAdam Krysztofiak
Adam Krysztofiak
JLJansje van der Linden
Jansje van der Linden
AKAjvar Kern
Ajvar Kern
SDSimon Deycmar
Simon Deycmar
VJVerena Jendrossek
Verena Jendrossek
Technical improvements in clinical radiotherapy for maximizing cytotoxicity to the tumor while limiting negative impact on co-irradiated healthy tissues include the increasing use of particle therapy (e.g., proton therapy) worldwide. Yet potential differences in the biology of DNA damage induction and repair between irradiation with X-ray photons and protons remain elusive. We compared the differences in DNA double strand break (DSB) repair and survival of cells compromised in non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), homologous recombination repair (HRR) or both, after irradiation with an equal dose of X-ray photons, entrance plateau (EP) protons, and mid spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) protons. We used super-resolution microscopy to investigate potential differences in spatial distribution of DNA damage foci upon irradiation. While DNA damage foci were equally distributed throughout the nucleus after X-ray photon irradiation, we observed more clustered DNA damage foci upon proton irradiation. Furthermore, deficiency in essential NHEJ proteins delayed DNA repair kinetics and sensitized cells to both, X-ray photon and proton irradiation, whereas deficiency in HRR proteins sensitized cells only to proton irradiation. We assume that NHEJ is indispensable for processing DNA DSB independent of the irradiation source, whereas the importance of HRR rises with increasing energy of applied irradiation.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sebastian OeckSebastian Oeck
Sebastian Oeck
KSKlaudia Szymonowicz
Klaudia Szymonowicz
GWGesa Wiel
Gesa Wiel
Adam KrysztofiakAdam Krysztofiak
Adam Krysztofiak
JLJamil Lambert
Jamil Lambert
VJVerena Jendrossek
Verena Jendrossek
Proton beam therapy is increasingly applied for the treatment of human cancer, as it promises to reduce normal tissue damage. However, little is known about the relationship between linear energy transfer (LET), the type of DNA damage, and cellular repair mechanisms, particularly for cells irradiated with protons. We irradiated cultured cells delivering equal doses of X-ray photons, Bragg-peak protons, or plateau protons and used this set-up to quantitate initial DNA damage (mainly DNA double strand breaks (DSBs)), and to analyze kinetics of repair by detecting γH2A.X or 53BP1 using immunofluorescence. The results obtained validate the reliability of our set-up in delivering equal radiation doses under all conditions employed. Although the initial numbers of γH2A.X and 53BP1 foci scored were similar under the different irradiation conditions, it was notable that the maximum foci level was reached at 60 min after irradiation with Bragg-peak protons, as compared to 30 min for plateau protons and photons. Interestingly, Bragg-peak protons induced larger and irregularly shaped γH2A.X and 53BP1 foci. Additionally, the resolution of these foci was delayed. These results suggest that Bragg-peak protons induce DNA damage of increased complexity which is difficult to process by the cellular repair apparatus.

1 July 2017 in Radiation Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sebastian OeckSebastian Oeck
Sebastian Oeck
Nathalie M. MalewiczNathalie M. Malewicz
Nathalie M. Malewicz
SHSebastian Hurst
Sebastian Hurst
KAKlaudia Al-Refae
Klaudia Al-Refae
Adam KrysztofiakAdam Krysztofiak
Adam Krysztofiak
VJVerena Jendrossek
Verena Jendrossek
The quantitative analysis of foci plays an important role in various cell biological methods. In the fields of radiation biology and experimental oncology, the effect of ionizing radiation, chemotherapy or molecularly targeted drugs on DNA damage induction and repair is frequently performed by the analysis of protein clusters or phosphorylated proteins recruited to so called repair foci at DNA damage sites, involving for example γ-H2A.X, 53BP1 or RAD51. We recently developed “The Focinator” as a reliable and fast tool for automated quantitative and qualitative analysis of nuclei and DNA damage foci. The refined software is now even more user-friendly due to a graphical interface and further features. Thus, we included an R-script-based mode for automated image opening, file naming, progress monitoring and an error report. Consequently, the evaluation no longer required the attendance of the operator after initial parameter definition. Moreover, the Focinator v2-0 is now able to perform multi-channel analy...

28 October 2021 in Nature Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MTMeetu Kaushik Tiwari
Meetu Kaushik Tiwari
DCDaniel A. Colon-Rios
Daniel A. Colon-Rios
HTHemanta C. Rao Tumu
Hemanta C. Rao Tumu
YLYanfeng Liu
Yanfeng Liu
EQElias Quijano
Elias Quijano
FRFaye A. Rogers
Faye A. Rogers

28 October 2021 in iScience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Adam KrysztofiakAdam Krysztofiak
Adam Krysztofiak
KSKlaudia Szymonowicz
Klaudia Szymonowicz
JHJulian Hlouschek
Julian Hlouschek
KXKexu Xiang
Kexu Xiang
CWChristoph Waterkamp
Christoph Waterkamp
Johann MatschkeJohann Matschke
Johann Matschke
Cancer bioenergetics fuel processes necessary to maintain viability and growth under stress conditions. We hypothesized that cancer metabolism supports the repair of radiation-induced DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs). We combined the systematic collection of metabolic and radiobiological data from a panel of irradiated cancer cell lines with mathematical modeling and identified a common metabolic response with impact on the DSB repair kinetics, including a mitochondrial shutdown followed by compensatory glycolysis and resumption of mitochondrial function. Combining ionizing radiation (IR) with inhibitors of the compensatory glycolysis or mitochondrial respiratory chain slowed mitochondrial recovery and DNA repair kinetics, offering an opportunity for therapeutic intervention. Mathematical modeling allowed us to generate new hypotheses on general and individual mechanisms of the radiation response with relevance to DNA repair and on metabolic vulnerabilities induced by cancer radiotherapy. These discoveries will guide future mechanistic studies for the discovery of metabolic targets for overcoming intrinsic or therapy-induced radioresistance.