Seung-Kwon Myung

Prof. Dr. Seung-Kwon Myung

National Cancer Center Korea
+1

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 January 2013 in BMJ
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Seung-Kwon MyungSeung-Kwon Myung
Seung-Kwon Myung
WJWoong Ju
Woong Ju
BCBelong Cho
Belong Cho
SOSeung-Won Oh
Seung-Won Oh
SPSang Min Park
Sang Min Park
FGfor the Korean Meta-Analysis (KORMA) Study Group
for the Korean Meta-Analysis (KORMA) Study Group
Objective To assess the efficacy of vitamin and antioxidant supplements in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases.Design Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Data sources and study selection PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov searched in June and November 2012. Two authors independently reviewed and selected eligible randomised controlled trials, based on predetermined selection criteria.Results Out of 2240 articles retrieved from databases and relevant bibliographies, 50 randomised controlled trials with 294 478 participants (156 663 in intervention groups and 137 815 in control groups) were included in the final analyses. In a fixed effect meta-analysis of the 50 trials, supplementation with vitamins and antioxidants was not associated with reductions in the risk of major cardiovascular events (relative risk 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.98 to 1.02; I2=42%). Overall, there was no beneficial effect of these supplements in the subgroup meta-analyses by type of prevention, type of vitamins and antioxidants, type of cardiovascular outcomes, study design, methodological quality, duration of treatment, funding source, provider of supplements, type of control, number of participants in each trial, and supplements given singly or in combination with other supplements. Among the subgroup meta-analyses by type of cardiovascular outcomes, vitamin and antioxidant supplementation was associated with a marginally increased risk of angina pectoris, while low dose vitamin B6 supplementation was associated with a slightly decreased risk of major cardiovascular events. Those beneficial or harmful effects disappeared in subgroup meta-analysis of high quality randomised controlled trials within each category. Also, even though supplementation with vitamin B6 was associated with a decreased risk of cardiovascular death in high quality trials, and vitamin E supplementation with a decreased risk of myocardial infarction, those beneficial effects were seen only in randomised controlled trials in which the supplements were supplied by the pharmaceutical industry.Conclusion There is no evidence to support the use of vitamin and antioxidant supplements for prevention of cardiovascular diseases.

14 May 2012 in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Seung-Kwon MyungSeung-Kwon Myung
Seung-Kwon Myung
SKSang Mi Kwak
Sang Mi Kwak
YLYoung Jae Lee
Young Jae Lee
HSHong Gwan Seo
Hong Gwan Seo
Review from JAMA Internal Medicine — Efficacy of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplements (Eicosapentaenoic Acid and Docosahexaenoic Acid) in the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease — A Meta-analysis of Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trials


25 May 2009 in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Seung-Kwon MyungSeung-Kwon Myung
Seung-Kwon Myung
DMDiana D. McDonnell
Diana D. McDonnell
GKGene Kazinets
Gene Kazinets
HSHong Gwan Seo
Hong Gwan Seo
JMJoel M. Moskowitz
Joel M. Moskowitz
Review from JAMA Internal Medicine — Effects of Web- and Computer-Based Smoking Cessation Programs — Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

1 January 2017 in Journal of Korean Medical Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ALAeyoung Lee
Aeyoung Lee
Seung-Kwon MyungSeung-Kwon Myung
Seung-Kwon Myung
JCJung Jin Cho
Jung Jin Cho
YJYu-Jin Jung
Yu-Jin Jung
JYJong Lull Yoon
Jong Lull Yoon
MKMee Young Kim
Mee Young Kim
Lee A, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Jul;32(7):1091-1096. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.7.1091

15 April 2018 in Cancer Research and Treatment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YCYoon-Jung Choi
Yoon-Jung Choi
Seung-Kwon MyungSeung-Kwon Myung
Seung-Kwon Myung
JLJi-Ho Lee
Ji-Ho Lee
The purpose of this study was to determine whether light alcohol drinking increases the risk of cancer by using a meta-analysis of cohort studies because the newly revised 2015 European Code against Cancer fourth edition on alcohol and cancer was based on critical flaws in the interpretation and citation of the previous meta-analyses. PubMed and EMBASE were searched in April, 2016. Two authors independently reviewed and selected cohort studies on the association between very light (≤ 0.5 drink/day), light (≤ 1 drink/day), or moderate drinking (1-2 drinks/day) and the risk of cancer incidence and mortality. A pooled relative riskwith its 95% confidence intervalwas calculated by a random-effects meta-analysis. Main outcome measures were cancer incidence and mortality. A total of 60 cohort studies from 135 articles were included in the final analysis. Very light drinking or light drinking was not associated with the incidence of most cancers except for female breast cancer in women and male colorectal cancer. Conversely, light drinking was associated with a decreased incidence of both female and male lung cancer significantly and both female and male thyroid cancer marginally significantly. Moderate drinking significantly increased the incidence of male colorectal cancer and female breast cancer,whereas it decreased the incidence of both female and male hematologic malignancy. We found that very light or light alcohol drinking was not associated with the risk of most of the common cancers except for the mild increase in the incidence of breast cancer in women and colorectal cancer in men.