Santiago Guerrero

Dr. Santiago Guerrero

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 September 2018 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SGSantiago Guerrero
Santiago Guerrero
Andrés López-CortésAndrés López-Cortés
Andrés López-Cortés
AIAlberto Indacochea
Alberto Indacochea
JGJennyfer M. García-Cárdenas
Jennyfer M. García-Cárdenas
AZAna Karina Zambrano
Ana Karina Zambrano
CPCesar Paz-y-Mino
Cesar Paz-y-Mino
Over the past decades, consistent studies have shown that race/ethnicity have a great impact on cancer incidence, survival, drug response, molecular pathways and epigenetics. Despite the influence of race/ethnicity in cancer outcomes and its impact in health care quality, a comprehensive understanding of racial/ethnic inclusion in oncological research has never been addressed. We therefore explored the racial/ethnic composition of samples/individuals included in fundamental (patient-derived oncological models, biobanks and genomics) and applied cancer research studies (clinical trials). Regarding patient-derived oncological models (n = 794), 48.3% have no records on their donor’s race/ethnicity, the rest were isolated from White (37.5%), Asian (10%), African American (3.8%) and Hispanic (0.4%) donors. Biobanks (n = 8,293) hold specimens from unknown (24.56%), White (59.03%), African American (11.05%), Asian (4.12%) and other individuals (1.24%). Genomic projects (n = 6,765,447) include samples from unknown (0.6%), White (91.1%), Asian (5.6%), African American (1.7%), Hispanic (0.5%) and other populations (0.5%). Concerning clinical trials (n = 89,212), no racial/ethnic registries were found in 66.95% of participants, and records were mainly obtained from Whites (25.94%), Asians (4.97%), African Americans (1.08%), Hispanics (0.16%) and other minorities (0.9%). Thus, two tendencies were observed across oncological studies: lack of racial/ethnic information and overrepresentation of Caucasian/White samples/individuals. These results clearly indicate a need to diversify oncological studies to other populations along with novel strategies to enhanced race/ethnicity data recording and reporting.

1 November 2016 in Cancer Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LWLaurence Wurth
Laurence Wurth
PPPanagiotis Papasaikas
Panagiotis Papasaikas
DODavid Olmeda
David Olmeda
NBNadine Bley
Nadine Bley
GCGuadalupe T. Calvo
Guadalupe T. Calvo
FGFatima Gebauer
Fatima Gebauer

19 January 2015 in Viruses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SGSantiago Guerrero
Santiago Guerrero
JBJulien Batisse
Julien Batisse
CLCamille Libre
Camille Libre
Serena BernacchiSerena Bernacchi
Serena Bernacchi
RMRoland Marquet
Roland Marquet
Jean-Christophe PaillartJean-Christophe Paillart
Jean-Christophe Paillart
Eukaryotic translation is a complex process composed of three main steps: initiation, elongation, and termination. During infections by RNA- and DNA-viruses, the eukaryotic translation machinery is used to assure optimal viral protein synthesis. Human immunodeficiency virus type I (HIV-1) uses several non-canonical pathways to translate its own proteins, such as leaky scanning, frameshifting, shunt, and cap-independent mechanisms. Moreover, HIV-1 modulates the host translation machinery by targeting key translation factors and overcomes different cellular obstacles that affect protein translation. In this review, we describe how HIV-1 proteins target several components of the eukaryotic translation machinery, which consequently improves viral translation and replication.

13 November 2017 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HLHyun Ju Lee
Hyun Ju Lee
DBDeniz Bartsch
Deniz Bartsch
CXCally Xiao
Cally Xiao
SGSantiago Guerrero
Santiago Guerrero
GAGaurav Ahuja
Gaurav Ahuja
DVDavid Vilchez
David Vilchez
While the transcriptional network of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) has been extensively studied, relatively little is known about how post-transcriptional modulations determine hESC function. RNA-binding proteins play central roles in RNA regulation, including translation and turnover. Here we show that the RNA-binding protein CSDE1 (cold shock domain containing E1) is highly expressed in hESCs to maintain their undifferentiated state and prevent default neural fate. Notably, loss of CSDE1 accelerates neural differentiation and potentiates neurogenesis. Conversely, ectopic expression of CSDE1 impairs neural differentiation. We find that CSDE1 post-transcriptionally modulates core components of multiple regulatory nodes of hESC identity, neuroectoderm commitment and neurogenesis. Among these key pro-neural/neuronal factors, CSDE1 binds fatty acid binding protein 7 (FABP7) and vimentin (VIM) mRNAs, as well as transcripts involved in neuron projection development regulating their stability and translation. Thus, our results uncover CSDE1 as a central post-transcriptional regulator of hESC identity and neurogenesis.

22 May 2020 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Andrés López-CortésAndrés López-Cortés
Andrés López-Cortés
Alejandro Cabrera-AndradeAlejandro Cabrera-Andrade
Alejandro Cabrera-Andrade
JVJose Vázquez-Naya
Jose Vázquez-Naya
ASAlejandro Pazos Sierra
Alejandro Pazos Sierra
Humbert G. DíazHumbert G. Díaz
Humbert G. Díaz
CMCristian Robert Munteanu
Cristian Robert Munteanu
Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease where genomic alterations, protein expression deregulation, signaling pathway alterations, hormone disruption, ethnicity and environmental determinants are involved. Due to the complexity of BC, the prediction of proteins involved in this disease is a trending topic in drug design. This work is proposing accurate prediction classifier for BC proteins using six sets of protein sequence descriptors and 13 machine-learning methods. After using a univariate feature selection for the mix of five descriptor families, the best classifier was obtained using multilayer perceptron method (artificial neural network) and 300 features. The performance of the model is demonstrated by the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) of 0.980 ± 0.0037, and accuracy of 0.936 ± 0.0056 (3-fold cross-validation). Regarding the prediction of 4,504 cancer-associated proteins using this model, the best ranked cancer immunotherapy proteins related to BC were RPS27, SUPT4H1, CLPSL2, POLR2K, RPL38, AKT3, CDK3, RPS20, RASL11A and UBTD1; the best ranked metastasis driver proteins related to BC were S100A9, DDA1, TXN, PRNP, RPS27, S100A14, S100A7, MAPK1, AGR3 and NDUFA13; and the best ranked RNA-binding proteins related to BC were S100A9, TXN, RPS27L, RPS27, RPS27A, RPL38, MRPL54, PPAN, RPS20 and CSRP1. This powerful model predicts several BC-related proteins that should be deeply studied to find new biomarkers and better therapeutic targets. Scripts can be downloaded athttps://github.com/muntisa/neural-networks-for-breast-cancer-proteins.

24 March 2020 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Andrés López-CortésAndrés López-Cortés
Andrés López-Cortés
CPCesar Paz-y-Mino
Cesar Paz-y-Mino
SGSantiago Guerrero
Santiago Guerrero
Alejandro Cabrera-AndradeAlejandro Cabrera-Andrade
Alejandro Cabrera-Andrade
SBStephen J. Barigye
Stephen J. Barigye
ETEduardo Tejera
Eduardo Tejera
Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death among women and the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. Although in recent years large-scale efforts have focused on identifying new therapeutic targets, a better understanding of BC molecular processes is required. Here we focused on elucidating the molecular hallmarks of BC heterogeneity and the oncogenic mutations involved in precision medicine that remains poorly defined. To fill this gap, we established an OncoOmics strategy that consists of analyzing genomic alterations, signaling pathways, protein-protein interactome network, protein expression, dependency maps in cell lines and patient-derived xenografts in 230 previously prioritized genes to reveal essential genes in breast cancer. As results, the OncoOmics BC essential genes were rationally filtered to 140. mRNA up-regulation was the most prevalent genomic alteration. The most altered signaling pathways were associated with basal-like and Her2-enriched molecular subtypes. RAC1, AKT1, CCND1, PIK3CA, ERBB2, CDH1, MAPK14, TP53, MAPK1, SRC, RAC3, BCL2, CTNNB1, EGFR, CDK2, GRB2, MED1 and GATA3 were essential genes in at least three OncoOmics approaches. Drugs with the highest amount of clinical trials in phases 3 and 4 were paclitaxel, docetaxel, trastuzumab, tamoxifen and doxorubicin. Lastly, we collected ~3,500 somatic and germline oncogenic variants associated with 50 essential genes, which in turn had therapeutic connectivity with 73 drugs. In conclusion, the OncoOmics strategy reveals essential genes capable of accelerating the development of targeted therapies for precision oncology.