Edoardo Rotigliano

Prof. Edoardo Rotigliano

University of Palermo, Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e del Mare
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2014 in Geomorphology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Christian ConoscentiChristian Conoscenti
Christian Conoscenti
SASilvia Angileri
Silvia Angileri
Chiara CappadoniaChiara Cappadonia
Chiara Cappadonia
Edoardo RotiglianoEdoardo Rotigliano
Edoardo Rotigliano
VAValerio Agnesi
Valerio Agnesi
Michael MaekerMichael Maeker
Michael Maeker

13 February 2012 in Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
dario costanzodario costanzo
dario costanzo
Edoardo RotiglianoEdoardo Rotigliano
Edoardo Rotigliano
CIC. Irigaray
C. Irigaray
JJJ. D. Jiménez-Perálvarez
J. D. Jiménez-Perálvarez
JCJ. Chacón
J. Chacón
A procedure to select the controlling factors connected to the slope instability has been defined. It allowed us to assess the landslide susceptibility in the Rio Beiro basin (about 10 km2) over the northeastern area of the city of Granada (Spain). Field and remote (Google EarthTM) recognition techniques allowed us to generate a landslide inventory consisting in 127 phenomena. To discriminate between stable and unstable conditions, a diagnostic area had been chosen as the one limited to the crown and the toe of the scarp of the landslide. 15 controlling or determining factors have been defined considering topographic, geologic, geomorphologic and pedologic available data. Univariate tests, using both association coefficients and validation results of single-variable susceptibility models, allowed us to select the best predictors, which were combined for the unique conditions analysis. For each of the five recognised landslide typologies, susceptibility maps for the best models were prepared. In order to verify both the goodness of fit and the prediction skill of the susceptibility models, two different validation procedures were applied and compared. Both procedures are based on a random partition of the landslide archive for producing a test and a training subset. The first method is based on the analysis of the shape of the success and prediction rate curves, which are quantitatively analysed exploiting two morphometric indexes. The second method is based on the analysis of the degree of fit, by considering the relative error between the intersected target landslides by each of the different susceptibility classes in which the study area was partitioned. Both the validation procedures confirmed a very good predictive performance of the susceptibility models and of the actual procedure followed to select the controlling factors.


1 April 2015 in Natural Hazards
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Alvaro Gómez-GutiérrezAlvaro Gómez-Gutiérrez
Alvaro Gómez-Gutiérrez
CCChristian Conoscenti
Christian Conoscenti
SASilvia Eleonora Angileri
Silvia Eleonora Angileri
Edoardo RotiglianoEdoardo Rotigliano
Edoardo Rotigliano
Susanne SchnabelSusanne Schnabel
Susanne Schnabel

1 August 2015 in Geomorphology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Christian ConoscentiChristian Conoscenti
Christian Conoscenti
MCMarilena Ciaccio
Marilena Ciaccio
NCNathalie Almaru Caraballo-Arias
Nathalie Almaru Caraballo-Arias
Alvaro Gómez-GutiérrezAlvaro Gómez-Gutiérrez
Alvaro Gómez-Gutiérrez
Edoardo RotiglianoEdoardo Rotigliano
Edoardo Rotigliano
VAValerio Agnesi
Valerio Agnesi

1 May 2016 in Geomorphology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Christian ConoscentiChristian Conoscenti
Christian Conoscenti
Edoardo RotiglianoEdoardo Rotigliano
Edoardo Rotigliano
MCMariaelena Cama
Mariaelena Cama
NCNathalie Almaru Caraballo-Arias
Nathalie Almaru Caraballo-Arias
LLLuigi Lombardo
Luigi Lombardo
VAValerio Agnesi
Valerio Agnesi