Adélia Nunes

Prof. Adélia Nunes

Department of Geography and Tourism, University of Coimbra
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2011 in Applied Geography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Adélia NunesAdélia Nunes
Adélia Nunes
AAAntónio Campar De Almeida
António Campar De Almeida
CCCeleste Coelho
Celeste Coelho

1 December 2016 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Adélia NunesAdélia Nunes
Adélia Nunes
LLLuciano Fernandes Lourenço
Luciano Fernandes Lourenço
AMAna C. Meira-Castro
Ana C. Meira-Castro

26 February 2010 in Land Degradation & Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Adélia NunesAdélia Nunes
Adélia Nunes
CCC. O. A. Coelho
C. O. A. Coelho
AAAntónio Campar De Almeida
António Campar De Almeida
AFAlbano Figueiredo
Albano Figueiredo


29 January 2020 in Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAna C. Meira-Castro
Ana C. Meira-Castro
Adélia NunesAdélia Nunes
Adélia Nunes
ASAntónio Sousa
António Sousa
LLLuciano Fernandes Lourenço
Luciano Fernandes Lourenço
This paper presents a spatial characterization of the distribution at district level of the forest fire events that occurred in mainland Portugal between 1996 and 2015 and whose causes were investigated. We further examine the breakdown of the causes of these forest fires over this period. Results supported by relevant validated statistics show that of the total fire events recorded, 94.4% were identified as an effective occurrence, of which 22.2% had burned an area greater than 1 ha, and of these only 42.1% were investigated. False alarms or fires without a recorded burning area are more significant in the districts of Aveiro, Lisbon and Porto, the biggest municipalities. Of the fires whose causes were investigated, the largest number of recorded events were in NE regions (49.0%), followed by NW regions (41.7%), and finally in the rest of the country (9.3%). Taking into account the ratio between the investigated fires and the total number of fires and the behavior profile produced for cluster analysis, a different panorama is brought to light, with the center and south regions showing greater effort to investigate the fires. A thorough analysis of the causes and motivations of the ignition of these forest fire occurrences showed that human activity, either deliberate (20.4%) or negligent (29.9%), outweigh natural phenomena (0.6%). Reactivations (14.6%) and Unknown (34.5%) causes decreased as time passed, whereas negligent and deliberate causes increased. However, these results could change if the percentage of unknown information in relation to the origin of the forest fires is considerable. The outcome of this research will support an efficient management related to fire mitigation and suppression including establishing preventive actions to reduce the occurrence of forest fires and emphasize the need to improve the procedure for recording forest fire events in Portugal, especially in relation to identifying their cause.

1 January 2018 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Sandra OliveiraSandra Oliveira
Sandra Oliveira
FFFernando Félix
Fernando Félix
Adélia NunesAdélia Nunes
Adélia Nunes
LLLuciano Fernandes Lourenço
Luciano Fernandes Lourenço
GLGiovanni Laneve
Giovanni Laneve
ASAna Sebastián-López
Ana Sebastián-López
Vulnerability assessment is a vital component of wildfire management. This research focused on the development of a framework to measure and map vulnerability levels in several areas within Mediterranean Europe, where wildfires are a major concern. The framework followed a stepwise approach to evaluate its main components, expressed by exposure, sensitivity and coping capacity. Data on population density, fuel types, protected areas location, roads infrastructure and surveillance activities, among others, were integrated to create composite indices, representing each component and articulated in multiple dimensions. Maps were created for several test areas, in northwest Portugal, southwest Sardinia in Italy and northeast Corsica in France, with the contribution of local participants from civil protection institutions and forest services. Results showed the influence of fuel sensitivity levels, population distribution and protected areas coverage for the overall vulnerability classes. Reasonable levels of accuracy were found on the maps provided through the validation procedure, with an overall match above 72% for the several sites. The systematic and flexible approach applied allowed for adjustments to local circumstances with regards to data availability and fire management procedures, without compromising its consistency and with substantial operational capabilities. The results obtained and the positive feedback of end-users encourage its further application, as a means to improve wildfire management strategies at multiple levels with the latest scientific outputs.