Søren Mikkelsen

Prof. Søren Mikkelsen

University of Southern Denmark
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

38Years (1989-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 1997 in European Journal of Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BEBjarke Ebert
Bjarke Ebert
Søren MikkelsenSøren Mikkelsen
Søren Mikkelsen
CTChristian Thorkildsen
Christian Thorkildsen
FBFinn Molke Borgbjerg
Finn Molke Borgbjerg

1 September 1998 in British Journal of Anaesthesia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMS Møiniche
S Møiniche
Søren MikkelsenSøren Mikkelsen
Søren Mikkelsen
JWJ Wetterslev
J Wetterslev
JDJ B Dahl
J B Dahl
In a qualitative systematic review, we have evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCT) of incisional local anaesthesia compared with placebo or no treatment in the control of postoperative pain after open abdominal operations. Twenty-six studies with data from 1211 patients were considered appropriate for analysis. Five RCT considered inguinal herniotomy, four hysterectomy, eight cholecystectomy and nine studies a variety of surgical procedures. Outcome measures were pain scores, supplementary analgesics and time to first analgesic request. Efficacy was estimated by significant difference (P < 0.05), as reported in the original investigation. All studies of herniotomy showed a 2-7-h duration of clinically relevant improved pain relief. Results of hysterectomy studies were inconclusive, with two being negative. Five of the cholecystectomy studies showed significant differences but questionable clinical importance and validity in three. In various other procedures results were inconsistent and in some of minor clinical importance. Except for herniotomy, there was a lack of evidence for effect of incisional local anaesthesia on postoperative pain and further standardized studies are needed before recommendations can be made.

4 November 2019 in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TLTim Lindskou
Tim Lindskou
Søren MikkelsenSøren Mikkelsen
Søren Mikkelsen
Erika Frischknecht ChristensenErika Frischknecht Christensen
Erika Frischknecht Christensen
PHPoul Anders Hansen
Poul Anders Hansen
GJGitte Jørgensen
Gitte Jørgensen
MSMorten Breinholt Søvsø
Morten Breinholt Søvsø
The emergency medical healthcare system outside hospital varies greatly across the globe - even within the western world. Within the last ten years, the demand for emergency medical service systems has increased, and the Danish emergency medical service system has undergone major changes. Therefore, we aimed to provide an updated description of the current Danish prehospital medical healthcare system. Since 2007, Denmark has been divided into five regions each responsible for health services, including the prehospital services. Each region may contract their own ambulance service providers. The Danish emergency medical services in general include ambulances, rapid response vehicles, mobile emergency care units and helicopter emergency medical services. All calls to the national emergency number, 1-1-2, are answered by the police, or the Copenhagen fire brigade, and since 2011 forwarded to an Emergency Medical Coordination Centre when the call relates to medical issues. At the Emergency Medical Coordination Centre, healthcare personnel assess the situation guided by the Danish Index for Emergency Care and determine the level of urgency of the situation, while technical personnel dispatch the appropriate medical emergency vehicles. In Denmark, all healthcare services, including emergency medical services are publicly funded and free of charge. In addition to emergency calls, other medical services are available for less urgent health problems around the clock. Prehospital personnel have since 2015 utilized a nationwide electronic prehospital medical record. The use of this prehospital medical record combined with Denmark’s extensive registries, linkable by the unique civil registration number, enables new and unique possibilities to do high quality prehospital research, with complete patient follow-up.

8 January 2010 in Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SZS. T. Zwisler
S. T. Zwisler
TET. P. Enggaard
T. P. Enggaard
Søren MikkelsenSøren Mikkelsen
Søren Mikkelsen
KBK. Brosen
K. Brosen
SSS. H. Sindrup
S. H. Sindrup

16 March 2009 in Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SZStine T. Zwisler
Stine T. Zwisler
TEThomas P. Enggaard
Thomas P. Enggaard
LNLene Noehr‐Jensen
Lene Noehr‐Jensen
RPRasmus S. Pedersen
Rasmus S. Pedersen
Søren MikkelsenSøren Mikkelsen
Søren Mikkelsen
SSSoeren H. Sindrup
Soeren H. Sindrup

23 April 2020 in Neurocritical Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMads Christian Tofte Gregers
Mads Christian Tofte Gregers
Søren MikkelsenSøren Mikkelsen
Søren Mikkelsen
KLKatrine Prier Lindvig
Katrine Prier Lindvig
ABAnne Craveiro Brøchner
Anne Craveiro Brøchner
For years, the use of ketamine as an anesthetic to patients suffering from acute brain injury has been debated because of its possible deleterious effects on the cerebral circulation and thus on the cerebral perfusion. Early studies suggested that ketamine could increase the intracranial pressure thus lowering the cerebral perfusion and hence reduce the oxygen supply to the injured brain. However, more recent studies are less conclusive and might even indicate that patients with acute brain injury could benefit from ketamine sedation. This systematic review summarizes the evidence regarding the use of ketamine in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury. Databases were searched for studies using ketamine in acute brain injury. Outcomes of interest were mortality, intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, blood pressure, heart rate, spreading depolarizations, and neurological function. In total 11 studies were included. The overall level of evidence concerning the use of ketamine in brain injury is low. Only two studies found a small increase in intracranial pressure, while two small studies found decreased levels of intracranial pressure following ketamine administration. We found no evidence of harm during ketamine use in patients suffering from acute brain injury.