It is well−established that plants are sessile and photoautotrophic organisms that rely on light throughout their entire life cycle. Light quality (spectral composition) is especially important as it provides energy for photosynthesis and influences signaling pathways that regulate plant development in the complex process of photomorphogenesis. During previous years, significant progress has been made in light quality’s physiological and biochemical effects on crops. However, understanding how light quality modulates plant growth and development remains a complex challenge. In this review, we provide an overview of the role of light quality in regulating the early development of plants, encompassing processes such as seed germination, seedling de−etiolation, and seedling establishment. These insights can be harnessed to improve production planning and crop quality by producing high−quality seedlings in plant factories and improving the theoretical framework for modern agriculture.

Aluminum (Al) toxicity is a major environmental stress that inhibits plant growth and development. There has been impressive progress in recent years that has greatly increased our understanding of the nature of Al toxicity and its mechanisms of tolerance. This review describes the transcription factors (TFs) and plant hormones involved in the adaptation to Al stress. In particular, it discusses strategies to confer plant resistance to Al stress, such as transgenic breeding, as well as small molecules and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) to alleviate Al toxicity. This paper provides a theoretical basis for the enhancement of plant production in acidic soils.

As sessile organisms, plants cannot survive in harmful environments, such as those characterized by drought, flood, heat, cold, nutrient deficiency, and salt or toxic metal stress. These stressors impair plant growth and development, leading to decreased crop productivity. To induce an appropriate response to abiotic stresses, plants must sense the pertinent stressor at an early stage to initiate precise signal transduction. Here, we provide an overview of recent progress in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying plant abiotic stress sensing. Numerous biomolecules have been found to participate in the process of abiotic stress sensing and function as abiotic stress sensors in plants. Based on their molecular structure, these biomolecules can be divided into four groups: Ca²⁺-permeable channels, receptor-like kinases (RLKs), sphingolipids, and other proteins. This improved knowledge can be used to identify key molecular targets for engineering stress-resilient crops in the field.

It is well-established that plants are sessile and photoautotrophic organisms that rely on light throughout their entire life cycle. Light quality (spectral composition) is especially important as it provides energy for photosynthesis and influences signaling pathways that regulate plant devel-opment in the complex process of photomorphogenesis. During past years, significant progress has been made in the physiological and biochemical effects of light quality on crops. However, understanding how light quality modulates plant growth and development remains a complex challenge. In this review, we provide an overview of the role of light quality in regulating early development of plants, encompassing processes such as seed germination, seedling de-etiolation, and seedling establishment. These insights can be harnessed to improve production planning and crop quality by producing high-quality seedlings in plant factories and improving the theoretical framework for modern agriculture.

Throughout their life cycle, plants persistent through environmental adversities that activate sophisticated stress-signaling networks, with protein kinases serving as pivotal regulators of these responses. The sucrose non-fermenting-1-related protein kinase 2 (SnRK2), a plant-specific serine/threonine kinase, orchestrates stress adaptation by phosphorylating downstream targets to modulate gene expression and physiological adjustments. While SnRK2 substrates have been extensively identified, the existing literature lacks a systematic classification of these components and their functional implications. This review synthesizes recent advances in characterizing SnRK2-phosphorylated substrates in Arabidopsis thaliana, providing a mechanistic framework for their roles in stress signaling and developmental regulation. Furthermore, we explore the understudied paradigm of SnRK2 undergoing multilayered post-translational modifications (PTMs), including phosphorylation, ubiquitination, SUMOylation, S-nitrosylation, sulfation (S-sulfination and tyrosine sulfation), and N-glycosylation. These PTMs collectively fine-tune SnRK2 stability, activity, and subcellular dynamics, revealing an intricate feedback system that balances kinase activation and attenuation. By integrating substrate networks with regulatory modifications, this work highlights SnRK2’s dual role as both a phosphorylation executor and a PTM-regulated scaffold, offering new perspectives for engineering stress-resilient crops through targeted manipulation of SnRK2 signaling modules.

Plants are commonly exposed to fluctuating illumination under natural light conditions, causing dynamic photosynthesis and further affecting plant growth and productivity. In this context, although the vital role of potassium (K) in steady-state photosynthesis has been well-established, knowledge of the dynamic changes in photosynthesis mediated by K remains scarce. Here, the gas-exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters under steady-state and dynamic photosynthetic responses were quantified in Phaseolus vulgaris L. seedlings grown under K-deficient (−K, 0.02 mM K) and normal K (+K, 2 mM K) conditions. After a transition from low to high light, the time course–induction curves of the net photosynthetic rate (A), stomatal conductance (g_s), mesophyll conductance (g_m), and maximum carboxylation rate (V_cmax) showed an obvious decline in the −K treatment. In comparison with the +K treatment, however, there were no statistical differences in the initial A and V_cmax values in P. vulgaris supplied with deficient K, suggesting that the K-deficiency-induced decreases in A and V_cmax were light-dependent. Interestingly, the time to reach 90% of the maximum A, g_s, and g_m significantly decreased in the −K treatment in comparison with the +K treatment by 27.2%, 45.6%, and 52.9%, respectively, whereas the time to reach 90% of the maximum V_cmax was correspondingly delayed by almost two-fold. The photosynthetic limitation during the induction revealed that the biochemical limitation was the dominating factor that constrained A under the −K conditions, while, under the +K conditions, the main limiting factor changed from biochemical limitation to stomatal limitation over time. Moreover, g_m imposed the smallest limitation on A during induction in both K treatments. These results indicate that a decreased K supply decreases the photosynthetic performance under fluctuating light in P. vulgaris and that improving the induction responses of biochemical components (i.e., V_cmax) has the potential to enhance the growth and productivity of crops grown in K-poor soil.