Evgenios Vlachos

Dr. Evgenios Vlachos


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 June 2016 in International Journal of Social Robotics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EJElizabeth Jochum
Elizabeth Jochum
EVEvgenios Vlachos
Evgenios Vlachos
ACAnja Christoffersen
Anja Christoffersen
SNSally Grindsted Nielsen
Sally Grindsted Nielsen
Ibrahim A. HameedIbrahim A. Hameed
Ibrahim A. Hameed
ZTZheng-Hua Tan
Zheng-Hua Tan

1 December 2018 in LIBER Quarterly
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NSNajmeh Shaghaei
Najmeh Shaghaei
CWCharlotte Wien
Charlotte Wien
JHJakob Povl Holck
Jakob Povl Holck
ATAnita L. Thiesen
Anita L. Thiesen
OEOle Ellegaard
Ole Ellegaard
TDThea Marie Drachen
Thea Marie Drachen

31 December 2016 in Interaction Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EVEvgenios Vlachos
Evgenios Vlachos
EJElizabeth Jochum
Elizabeth Jochum
LDLouis-Philippe Demers
Louis-Philippe Demers
We present results of a quasi-experimental study investigating how user preference might change after direct interaction with two different types of robot regarding morphology and affordances: a machine-like that interacts through touch, and a human-like that interacts verbally. The study was performed in an art exhibition setting, where visitors had the opportunity to interact with the robots voluntarily, and were asked to fill out questionnaires before and after the experience. Post interactions, visitors preferred to touch the machine-like “hard” robot despite initial stated preference for soft materials, preferred mutual contact despite initial preference of subject to initiate touch, and preferred communication with a robot that could touch rather than initial preference for a robot that could “see”. Overall, users showed a significant constant preference for the machine-like robot, reportedly feeling a stronger connection with it than with the human-like one as it met their expectations, and they found its movements more appealing. Social conditioning can render people reluctant to touch a robot with very human-like appearance, and set the expectations for interaction too high to meet. Our results, lastly, indicate that interaction with more than one type of social robot can affect the interaction experience for each of the robots.

27 December 2017 in IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DHDamith Herath
Damith Herath
EJElizabeth Jochum
Elizabeth Jochum
EVEvgenios Vlachos
Evgenios Vlachos
The human perception of cognitive robots as social depends on many factors, including those that do not necessarily pertain to a robot’s cognitive functioning. Experience Design offers a useful framework for evaluating when participants interact with robots as products or tools and when they regard them as social actors. This study describes a between-participants experiment conducted at a science museum, where visitors were invited to play a game of noughts and crosses with a Baxter robot. The goal is to foster meaningful interactions that promote engagement between the human and robot in a museum context. Using an Experience Design framework, we tested the robot in three different conditions to better understand which factors contribute to the perception of robots as social. The experiment also outlines best practices for conducting human-robot interaction research in museum exhibitions. Results from the study indicate that perceived social presence can be evaluated using a combination of HRI and Experience Design methods that measure co-presence and co-experience.

14 September 2017 in International Journal of Social Robotics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZTZheng-Hua Tan
Zheng-Hua Tan
NTNicolai Bæk Thomsen
Nicolai Bæk Thomsen
XDXiaodong Duan
Xiaodong Duan
EVEvgenios Vlachos
Evgenios Vlachos
SSSven Ewan Shepstone
Sven Ewan Shepstone
JHJesper Lisby Højvang
Jesper Lisby Højvang

10 July 2020
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
EVEvgenios Vlachos
Evgenios Vlachos
AHAnne Faber Hansen
Anne Faber Hansen
JHJakob Povl Holck
Jakob Povl Holck