The prevalence of acinetobacter baumannii (AB) as a cause of hospital infections has been rising. Unfortunately, emerging colistin resistance limits therapeutic options and affects the outcome. The aim of the study was to confirm our clinically-driven hypothesis that intensive care unit (ICU) patients with AB resistant-to-colistin (ABCoR) bloodstream infection (BSI) develop fulminant septic shock and die. We conducted a 28-month retrospective observational study including all patients developing AB infection on ICU admission or during ICU stay. From 622 screened patients, 31 patients with BSI sepsis were identified. Thirteen (41.9%) patients had ABCoR BSI and 18/31 (58.1%) had colistin-susceptible (ABCoS) BSI. All ABCoR BSI patients died; of them, 69% (9/13) presented with fulminant septic shock and died within the first 3 days from its onset. ABCoR BSI patients compared to ABCoS BSI patients had higher mortality (100% vs. 50%, respectively (p = 0.001)), died sooner (p = 0.006), had lower pH (p = 0.004) and higher lactate on ICU admission (p = 0.0001), and had higher APACHE II (p = 0.01) and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (p = 0.044). In conclusion, we documented that critically ill patients with ABCoR BSI exhibit fulminant septic shock with excessive mortality. Our results highlight the emerging clinical problem of AB colistin resistance among ICU patients.

Sepsis, defined as the life-threatening dysregulated host response to an infection leading to organ dysfunction, is considered as one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, especially in intensive care units (ICU). Moreover, sepsis remains an enigmatic clinical syndrome, with complex pathophysiology incompletely understood and a great heterogeneity both in terms of clinical expression, patient response to currently available therapeutic interventions and outcomes. This heterogeneity proves to be a major obstacle in our quest to deliver improved treatment in septic critical care patients; thus, identification of clinical phenotypes is absolutely necessary. Although this might be seen as an extremely difficult task, nowadays, artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques can be recruited to quantify similarities between individuals within sepsis population and differentiate them into distinct phenotypes regarding not only temperature, hemodynamics or type of organ dysfunction, but also fluid status/responsiveness, trajectories in ICU and outcome. Hopefully, we will eventually manage to determine both the subgroup of septic patients that will benefit from a therapeutic intervention and the correct timing of applying the intervention during the disease process.

Nosocomial pneumonia, including hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia, is the leading cause of death related to hospital-acquired infections among critically ill patients. A growing proportion of these cases are attributed to multi-drug-resistant (MDR-) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). MDR-GNB pneumonia often leads to delayed appropriate treatment, prolonged hospital stays, and increased morbidity and mortality. This issue is compounded by the increased toxicity profiles of the conventional antibiotics required to treat MDR-GNB infections. In recent years, several novel antibiotics have been licensed for the treatment of GNB nosocomial pneumonia. These novel antibiotics are promising therapeutic options for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia by MDR pathogens with certain mechanisms of resistance. Still, antibiotic resistance remains an evolving global crisis, and resistance to novel antibiotics has started emerging, making their judicious use crucial to prolong their shelf-life. This article presents an up-to-date review of these novel antibiotics and their current role in the antimicrobial armamentarium. We critically present data for the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, the in vitro spectrum of antimicrobial activity and resistance, and in vivo data for their clinical and microbiological efficacy in trials. Where possible, available data are summarized specifically in patients with nosocomial pneumonia, as this cohort may exhibit ‘critical illness’ physiology that affects drug efficacy.

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic increased the incidence of severe infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens among critically ill patients, such as Acinetobacter baumannii (AB), whose bloodstream infections (BSIs) have been associated with significant mortality. Whether there is any difference in outcome between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients with AB BSI still remains unknown. We conducted a retrospective study comparing clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 critically ill patients with AB BSI. Overall, 133 patients with AB BSI (102 COVID-19, 31 non-COVID-19) were studied. The 28-day mortality rate was high and did not differ significantly (69.6% COVID-19 vs. 61.3% non-COVID-19, p = 0.275). Patients with septic shock had a higher mortality rate irrespective of their status with the majority of deaths occurring during the first 7 days. COVID-19 patients were more likely to have ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) as the source of BSI (55.8% vs. 22.3%, respectively, p = 0.0001) and were more likely to develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (78.4% vs. 48.4%, respectively, p = 0.001), sepsis (86.3% vs. 67.7%, respectively, p = 0.03), and septic shock (88.3% vs. 58.1%, respectively, p = 0.007) compared to the non-COVID-19 patient group. In conclusion, COVID-19 patients with A. baumannii BSI have a high rate of mortality and more often develop septic shock, while VAP is the main origin of their BSI.

Objectives: Although preclinical evidence indicates that injurious mechanical ventilation may lead to acute kidney injury (AKI), relevant clinical evidence is limited. We aimed to investigate the association of driving pressure (a marker of injurious mechanical ventilation) with subsequent development of AKI in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Design: Secondary analysis of individual patient-level data from seven ARDS Network and Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury (PETAL) Network randomized controlled clinical trials. Setting: Adult ICUs participating in the ARDS Network and PETAL Network trials. Patients: After exclusion of patients with early AKI (i.e., those who met AKI criteria within the first 2 d following ARDS onset), we classified the study population into two groups: “late AKI” and “no AKI.” The “late AKI” group included patients who developed AKI more than 2 days but no longer than 7 days following ARDS onset. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Of 5367 patients with ARDS initially enrolled in trials, 2960 patients were included in the main analysis. Late AKI developed in 1000 patients (33.8%). After controlling for confounders, baseline driving pressure was independently associated with development of late AKI (each 1 sd increase in driving pressure was associated with a 35% increase in the odds of late AKI [odds ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.15–1.58]). This result persisted in the sensitivity analysis, which did not exclude patients with early AKI, and in the sensitivity analysis, which included patients who developed AKI later than 7 days following ARDS onset. There was a threshold of driving pressure equal to 15 cm H₂O for its association with development of late AKI. Conclusions: Driving pressure was associated with subsequent development of AKI in patients with ARDS suggesting that injurious mechanical ventilation may lead to AKI.