Pei Han

Dr. Pei Han

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 September 2022 in Microorganisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YLYu Lu
Yu Lu
WCWeijie Cai
Weijie Cai
ZRZun Ren
Zun Ren
PHPei Han
Pei Han
Despite advanced implant sterilization and aseptic surgical techniques, implant-associated infection remains a major challenge for orthopedic surgeries. The subject of bacterial biofilms is receiving increasing attention, probably as a result of the wide acknowledgement of the ubiquity of biofilms in the clinical environment, as well as the extreme difficulty in eradicating them. Biofilm can be defined as a structured microbial community of cells that are attached to a substratum and embedded in a matrix of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) that they have produced. Biofilm development has been proposed as occurring in a multi-step process: (i) attachment and adherence, (ii) accumulation/maturation due to cellular aggregation and EPS production, and (iii) biofilm detachment (also called dispersal) of bacterial cells. In all these stages, characteristic proteinaceous and non-proteinaceous compounds are expressed, and their expression is strictly controlled. Bacterial biofilm formation around implants shelters the bacteria and encourages the persistence of infection, which could lead to implant failure and osteomyelitis. These complications need to be treated by major revision surgeries and extended antibiotic therapies, which could lead to high treatment costs and even increase mortality. Effective preventive and therapeutic measures to reduce risks for implant-associated infections are thus in urgent need.

19 February 2016 in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CZChangli Zhao
Changli Zhao
PHPeng Hou
Peng Hou
JNJiahua Ni
Jiahua Ni
PHPei Han
Pei Han
YCYimin Chai
Yimin Chai
XZXiaonong Zhang
Xiaonong Zhang

6 October 2024 in npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMingzhang Li
Mingzhang Li
BWBoyong Wang
Boyong Wang
JCJiani Chen
Jiani Chen
LJLuhui Jiang
Luhui Jiang
YZYawen Zhou
Yawen Zhou
HSHao Shen
Hao Shen
The Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) SaeRS two-component system (TCS) regulates over 20 virulence factors. While its impact on chronic infection has been thoroughly discussed, its role in the early stage of infection remains elusive. Since macrophages serve as the primary immune defenders at the onset of infection, this study investigates the influence of SaeRS on macrophage functions and elucidates the underlying mechanisms. Macrophage expression of inflammatory and chemotactic factors, phagocytosis, and bactericidal activity against S. aureus were assessed, along with the evaluation of cellular oxidative stress. SaeRS was found to impair macrophage function. Mechanistically, SaeRS inhibited NF-κB pathway activation via toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2). Its immune-modulating effect could partially be explained by the strengthened biofilm formation. More importantly, we found SaeRS compromised macrophage immune functions at early infection stages even prior to biofilm formation. These early immune evasion effects were dependent on bacterial clumping as cytokine secretion, phagocytosis, and bactericidal activity were repaired when clumping was inhibited. We speculate that the bacterial clumping-mediated antigen mask is responsible for SaeRS-mediated immune evasion at the early infection stage. In vivo, ΔsaeRS infection was cleared earlier, accompanied by early pro-inflammatory cytokines production, and increased tissue oxidative stress. Subsequently, macrophages transitioned to an anti-inflammatory state, thereby promoting tissue repair. In summary, our findings underscore the critical role of the SaeRS TCS in S. aureus pathogenicity, particularly during early infection, which is likely initiated by SaeRS-mediated bacterial clumping.

1 October 2019 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HWHongliu Wu
Hongliu Wu
CZChengjian Zhang
Chengjian Zhang
TLTengfei Lou
Tengfei Lou
BCBowei Chen
Bowei Chen
RYRuibang Yi
Ruibang Yi
XZXiaonong Zhang
Xiaonong Zhang

9 December 2016 in Biomedical Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PHPeng Hou
Peng Hou
CZChangli Zhao
Changli Zhao
PCPengfei Cheng
Pengfei Cheng
HWHongliu Wu
Hongliu Wu
JNJiahua Ni
Jiahua Ni
YCYimin Chai
Yimin Chai
Magnesium and its alloys have drawn interest as antibacterial biomaterials, owing to their ability to alkalize the surrounding medium during degradation. The antibacterial effect of pure Mg and Mg alloys in vitro has previously been reported. However, the antibacterial property of Mg in vivo might be different because of the apparently dissimilar corrosion characteristics. In this study, pure Mg rods were implanted and bacterial suspension were injected into rat femurs to investigate the antibacterial property of Mg in vivo . The results showed that contrary to the high antibacterial rate in vitro , Mg exhibited a dramatic drop in antibacterial effect in vivo . Bacteria proliferated on the surface of the Mg rods as well as in the femur. Inflammatory cells filled cavities in the cortical bone of the femur, which was demonstrated by histological and micro-CT examination after 2 and 4 weeks of implantation. It is suggested that a reduced corrosion rate in vivo would result in insufficient pH value. In addition, the deposition layer would prevent further corrosion of Mg and provide a favorite site for bacteria adhesion. Hence, the dramatically reduced antibacterial property of Mg needs to be noticed when it is used as a biomaterial.

22 February 2024 in ACS Nano
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FJFeng Jiang
Feng Jiang
JWJian Wang
Jian Wang
ZRZun Ren
Zun Ren
YHYujie Hu
Yujie Hu
BWBoyong Wang
Boyong Wang
HSHao Shen
Hao Shen