MARIA LAGADINOU

Dr. MARIA LAGADINOU

Consultant
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 March 2020 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMARIA LAGADINOU
MARIA LAGADINOU
MOMaria Onisor
Maria Onisor
ARAthanasios Rigas
Athanasios Rigas
DMDaniel Vasile Musetescu
Daniel Vasile Musetescu
DGDESPOINA GKENTZI
DESPOINA GKENTZI
MMMARKOS N MARANGOS
MARKOS N MARANGOS
In recent years, due to the dramatic increase in and global spread of bacterial resistance to a number of commonly used antibacterial agents, many studies have been directed at investigating drugs whose primary therapeutic purpose is not antimicrobial action. In an era where it is becoming increasingly difficult to find new antimicrobial drugs, it is important to understand these antimicrobial effects and their potential clinical implications. Numerous studies report the antibacterial activity of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, local anaesthetics, phenothiazines such as chlorpromazine, levomepromazine, promethazine, trifluoperazine, methdilazine and thioridazine, antidepressants, antiplatelets and statins. Several studies have explored a possible protective effect of statins inreducing the morbidity and mortality of many infectious diseases. Various non-antibiotic agents exhibit antimicrobial activity via multiple and different mechanisms of action. Further studies are required in the field to further investigate these antimicrobial properties in different populations. This is of paramount importance in the antimicrobial resistance era, where clinicians have limited therapeutic options to combat problematic infections.

8 December 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IAIoanna Akrida
Ioanna Akrida
Nikolaos V. MichalopoulosNikolaos V. Michalopoulos
Nikolaos V. Michalopoulos
MLMARIA LAGADINOU
MARIA LAGADINOU
MPMARIA Papadoliopoulou
MARIA Papadoliopoulou
IMIoannis Maroulis
Ioannis Maroulis
Francesk MulitaFrancesk Mulita
Francesk Mulita
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become the standard of care for clinically node-negative breast cancer and has recently been shown by clinical trials to be also feasible for clinically node-positive patients treated with primary systemic therapy. The dual technique using both radioisotope (RI) and blue dye (BD) as tracers for the identification of sentinel lymph nodes is considered the gold standard. However, allergic reactions to blue dye as well as logistics issues related to the use of radioactive agents, have led to research on new sentinel lymph node (SLN) tracers and to the development and introduction of novel techniques in the clinical practice. Indocyanine green (ICG) is a water-soluble dye with fluorescent properties in the near-infrared (NIR) spectrum. ICG has been shown to be safe and effective as a tracer during SLNB for breast cancer and accumulating evidence suggests that ICG is superior to BD and at least comparable to RI alone and to RI combined with BD. Thus, ICG was recently proposed as a reliable SLN tracer in some breast cancer clinical practice guidelines. Nevertheless, there is lack of consensus regarding the optimal role of ICG for SLN mapping. Specifically, it is yet to be determined whether ICG should be used in addition to BD and/or RI, or if ICG could potentially replace these long-established traditional SLN tracers. This article is an updated overview of somerecent studies that compared ICG with BD and/or RI regarding their accuracy and effectiveness during SLNB for breast cancer.

1 October 2018 in Journal of Critical Care
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Loukas KakoullisLoukas Kakoullis
Loukas Kakoullis
NPNikolaos-Dimitrios Pantzaris
Nikolaos-Dimitrios Pantzaris
CPChiristina Platanaki
Chiristina Platanaki
MLMARIA LAGADINOU
MARIA LAGADINOU
EPEleni Papachristodoulou
Eleni Papachristodoulou
DVDimitrios Velissaris
Dimitrios Velissaris

19 May 2022 in Microorganisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Stelios F. AssimakopoulosStelios F. Assimakopoulos
Stelios F. Assimakopoulos
GEGerasimos Eleftheriotis
Gerasimos Eleftheriotis
MLMARIA LAGADINOU
MARIA LAGADINOU
VKVasileios Karamouzos
Vasileios Karamouzos
PDPeriklis Dousdampanis
Periklis Dousdampanis
MMMarkos Marangos
Markos Marangos
A considerable proportion of patients with severe COVID-19 meet Sepsis-3 criteria and share common pathophysiological mechanisms of multiorgan injury with bacterial sepsis, in absence of secondary bacterial infections, a process characterized as “viral sepsis”. The intestinal barrier exerts a central role in the pathophysiological sequence of events that lead from SARS-CoV-2 infection to severe systemic complications. Accumulating evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 disrupts the integrity of the biological, mechanical and immunological gut barrier. Specifically, microbiota diversity and beneficial bacteria population are reduced, concurrently with overgrowth of pathogenic bacteria (dysbiosis). Enterocytes’ tight junctions (TJs) are disrupted, and the apoptotic death of intestinal epithelial cells is increased leading to increased gut permeability. In addition, mucosal CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells, Th17 cells, neutrophils, dendritic cells and macrophages are activated, and T-regulatory cells are decreased, thus promoting an overactivated immune response, which further injures the intestinal epithelium. This dysfunctional gut barrier in SARS-CoV-2 infection permits the escape of luminal bacteria, fungi and endotoxin to normally sterile extraintestinal sites and the systemic circulation. Pre-existing gut barrier dysfunction and endotoxemia in patients with comorbidities including cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes and immunosuppression predisposes to aggravated endotoxemia. Bacterial and endotoxin translocation promote the systemic inflammation and immune activation, which characterize the SARS-CoV-2 induced “viral sepsis” syndrome associated with multisystemic complications of severe COVID-19.

3 August 2020 in Cureus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NZNicholas Zareifopoulos
Nicholas Zareifopoulos
MLMARIA LAGADINOU
MARIA LAGADINOU
AKAnastasia Karela
Anastasia Karela
OKOurania Kyriakopoulou
Ourania Kyriakopoulou
DVDimitrios Velissaris
Dimitrios Velissaris
The adverse events of antiviral drugs are dose-dependent and often reversible. The nervous system is often affected and to date, many studies have been published regarding the central nervous system toxicity of antiviral agents. They may cause significant neuropsychiatric complications, which range from mild symptoms such as irritability and difficulty sleeping to severe complications such as depression, psychosis, and painful peripheral neuropathy, side effects which may necessitate discontinuation of treatment. The pathogenetic mechanisms may involve molecular targets common to other centrally active drugs, including human monoamine oxidase‐A (MAO‐A), serotonin receptors, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) GABA-A receptors, 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors and others. Notable examples include oseltamivir which may act as MAO inhibitor and efavirenz, which has an affinity for serotonin 5-HT2 and GABA-A receptors, the serotonin transporter, the MAO enzyme, and the vesicular monoamine transporter, with subjective effects which may be similar to those of the psychedelic hallucinogen lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD). Other antiviral drugs with prominent nervous system effects include nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, which are associated with the development of peripheral neuropathy after prolonged use (an effect strongly associated with older drugs which have since fallen into disfavor such as stavudine) and interferons, which may cause depression. Clinicians should be familiar with such adverse effects in order to recognise them promptly once they occur and manage them appropriately.

9 February 2023 in Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Stelios F. AssimakopoulosStelios F. Assimakopoulos
Stelios F. Assimakopoulos
VKVasileios Karamouzos
Vasileios Karamouzos
GEGerasimos Eleftheriotis
Gerasimos Eleftheriotis
MLMARIA LAGADINOU
MARIA LAGADINOU
CBChristina Bartzavali
Christina Bartzavali
MMMarkos Marangos
Markos Marangos
Acinetobacter baumannii (AB) has evolved over the last decades as a major problem in carbapenem-resistant gram-negative nosocomial infections, associated with high mortality rates especially in the intensive care unit (ICU). Recent reports highlight the increasing prevalence of resistance to colistin, a last resort therapeutic option for carbapenem-resistant AB. We retrospectively evaluated the characteristics, treatment regimens and outcomes of twenty patients with pan-drug resistant (PDR) AB primary bacteremia hospitalized in the ICU of the University General Hospital of Patras, during a two-year period (October 2020–September 2022). The 28-day mortality reached 50%. Between survivors and non-survivors, no differences were found regarding age, gender, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). However, non-survivors had higher APACHE II scores and higher prevalence of septic shock and COVID-19 infection. A significantly higher percentage in the survivor group received Fosfomycin as part of the combination regimen. Inclusion of fosfomycin in the combination therapeutic regimen was associated with significantly better survival as compared to non-fosfomycin-containing regimens. In view of the increasing prevalence of PDR-AB infections in ICUs, its associated high rates of mortality and the lack of effective treatment options, the observed survival benefit with fosfomycin inclusion in the therapeutic regimen merits further validation in larger prospective studies.