Tommaso Di Vico

Dr. Tommaso Di Vico


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 March 2020 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TVTommaso Di Vico
Tommaso Di Vico
RMRiccardo Morganti
Riccardo Morganti
Tommaso CaiTommaso Cai
Tommaso Cai
KNKurt Naber
Kurt Naber
FWFlorian Wagenlehner
Florian Wagenlehner
RBRiccardo Bartoletti
Riccardo Bartoletti
Acute Cystitis Symptom Score (ACSS) is an 18-item self-reporting questionnaire for clinical diagnosis and follow-up of acute uncomplicated cystitis (AUC) in women. The ACSS, originally developed in Uzbek and Russian languages, is now available in several languages. The purpose of the study was to validate the ACSS questionnaire in the Italian language. Linguistic validation was carried out according to Linguistic Validation Manual for Patient-Reported Outcomes Instruments guidelines. Clinical validation was carried out by enrolling one hundred Italian-speaking women. All women were asked to fill in the ACSS questionnaire during their medical visit. Fifty-four women, median age 36 (Inter Quartile Range 28–49), were diagnosed with AUC, while 46 women, median age 38 (IQR 29–45), were enrolled as the control group attending the hospital’s fertility center for couples. The most frequently isolated pathogen in AUC was Escherichia coli (40; 74.0%) followed by Enterococcus faecalis (7; 13.0%) and Staphylococcus saprophyticus (3; 5.6%). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis performed at the first diagnostic visit on a typical symptoms domain cut-off score of 6 revealed a sensitivity of 92.5% and specificity of 97.8%. The Italian version of the ACSS has proved to be a reliable tool with a high accuracy in diagnosis and follow-up in women with AUC. The ACSS may also be useful for clinical and epidemiological studies.

1 December 2018 in Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Tommaso CaiTommaso Cai
Tommaso Cai
TVTommaso Di Vico
Tommaso Di Vico
JDJacopo Durante
Jacopo Durante
ATAlessio Tognarelli
Alessio Tognarelli
RBRiccardo Bartoletti
Riccardo Bartoletti
INTRODUCTION: Human papilloma virus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted pathogen and its potential role in the genesis of several diseases such as cervical, head and neck, anal and penile cancers, is now largely recognized. Aim of this review article was to evaluate and summarize the state of the art of HPV-related urogenital cancers, focusing on the potentially innovative methods for the diagnosis of infection that should be used to improve viral causative detection and prevent its diffusion through sexual intercourses. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The initial search was carried out by using the Medline and the Google Scholar computerized databases through the selected key-words to identify the more recent literature on HPV epidemiology and its relationship with the main relevant urinary tract cancers. Studies were selected, extracted, analyzed and summarized. The PRISMA statement criteria were adopted and reported. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Polymerase chain reaction assay (HPV test) represents the best option for the diagnosis of HPV infection. Difficulties for the diagnosis in male are due to the site of investigation (glans, sub coronal sulcus, scrotum, urine, sperm) and the method adopted to take the sample (brushing, tissue biopsy). Due to these reasons several studies analyzed seemed to be incomparable. HPV infection is generally found in about 20% of heterosexual men. Its connection with cervical, anal, head and neck and penile cancer has been previously evidenced in 90%, 60%, 68% and 40% of cases respectively. In particular, HPV infection differed significantly among penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) subtypes ranging from 22.4% in verrucous subtype to 66.3% for the basaloid/warty subtype. Although the connection between prostate cancer and HPV infection has never been previously confirmed, forest plot analysis relative to a series of nine studies done during the last ten years, demonstrated a 7.7 objective risk (OR) for subjects with HPV infection to develop subsequent prostate cancer. On the other hand, some authors found comparable results in subjects with prostate cancer, benign prostate hyperplasia and prostate inflammation, thus demonstrating that this link still remains questionable. Similarly, the connection between HPV infection and urothelial, testicular and renal cancer continue to be hotly debated although HPV has been found in the urine, semen and renal tissue of patients respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated parts of HPV (E6 and E7 fractions) have been previously found in cervical, head and neck, anal and penile cancers. Conversely, although the evidence of concomitant HPV infection, integrated viral genome in cancer cells DNA had never been demonstrated in all the other genito-urinary tract cancers, and its role in the tumor genesis remain still largely debated. This is the reason why HPV infection should be tested in all patients with genitourinary cancer to better investigate about its potential role in the tumor genesis and development. Moreover, HPV infection option should be kept in mind when considering possible viral transmission to sexual partners.

20 March 2022 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GTGabriele Tulone
Gabriele Tulone
SGSofia Giannone
Sofia Giannone
PMPiero Mannone
Piero Mannone
ATAlessio Tognarelli
Alessio Tognarelli
TVTommaso Di Vico
Tommaso Di Vico
Alchiede SimonatoAlchiede Simonato
Alchiede Simonato
Our study aimed to compare the incidence of infective complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSBx) when adopting different antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens. A multi-institutional cohort of 1150 patients who underwent TRUSBx was retrospectively analyzed. Procedures were performed between 2017 and 2019 (before and after the EMA warning about the use of fluoroquinolones for the antibiotic prophylaxis of patient candidates to TRUSBx). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of infective complications, including sepsis and/or fever. The population was stratified according to the antibiotic prophylaxis adopted: fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, prulifloxacin), cephalosporins (cefixime, ceftriaxone) or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Univariable and multivariable binomial logistic regression models were used to assess the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) testing of the risk of infective complication after adjusting for each prebiopsy covariate. In total, 478 (41.6%) patients received fluoroquinolone-based prophylaxis. Among these, 443 (38.5%), 25 (2.2%) and 10 (0.9%) patients received levofloxacin prophylaxis, ciprofloxacin and prulifloxacin, respectively while 14.6% received cefixime, 20.7% received the comedication of ceftriaxone/fosfomycin and 23.1% received trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. The trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and fluoroquinolone regimens were significantly associated with a lower risk of infective complications (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03–0.48, p = 0.003 and OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.06–0.43, p < 0.001, respectively). The ceftriaxone/fosfomycin (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.04–0.92, p = 0.04) and fluoroquinolone (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.00–0.70, p = 0.048) prophylaxis were associated with a lower risk of infective sequelae. Fluoroquinolone-based prophylaxis was associated with a lower risk of infective complications after TRUSBx compared to other prophylaxis regimens although its clinical application was recently forbidden by European Medical Agency restrictions.

14 July 2022 in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RBRiccardo Bartoletti
Riccardo Bartoletti
Antonio Luigi PastoreAntonio Luigi Pastore
Antonio Luigi Pastore
FFFilippo Menchini Fabris
Filippo Menchini Fabris
TVTommaso Di Vico
Tommaso Di Vico
RMRiccardo Morganti
Riccardo Morganti
AZAlessandro Zucchi
Alessandro Zucchi
Background: To investigate in a longitudinal cohort study, the best treatment to preserve fertility in cryptorchid subjects. Patients treated with immediate hormonal vs. delayed vs. combined (hormone plus surgery) therapy consecutively enrolled during the period 1987–1997, were evaluated.Methods: Two hundred fifty-five subjects were enrolled and 192 patients completed the follow-upt. One hundred fifty-six patients and 36 out 192 had monolateral and bilateral cryptorchidism, respectively. Twenty-nine out of 192 were previously treated by surgery alone (Group A), 93/192 by hormone therapy alone (Group B), 51/192 received sequential combined hormone therapy plus surgery (Group C) whilst 19/192 refused any type of treatment (Group D). The other 63 patients were considered lost to follow-up. All the patients underwent medical consultation, scrotal ultrasound scan, sperm analysis and Inhibin B, Follicular Stimulating Hormone (FSH) and Testosterone (T) serum level determination.Results: Testicular volume was found decreased in the Group D patients whilst hormone serum levels were comparable in all groups. Statistically significant differences for sperm characteristics were found in patients treated with hormonal therapy alone or combined with surgery (Groups B and C). These two groups reported better semen quality than patients who received surgery alone or no treatment. No differences were observed between monolateral and bilateral cryptorchidism patients.Conclusions: Early prolonged hormonal therapy is advisable in all patients with cryptorchidism independently from the surgical option of promoting testicular descent to the scrotum. Hormonal therapy provides in our study better chance to obtain adequate sperm quality in adult life.

1 April 2020 in Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TVTommaso Di Vico
Tommaso Di Vico
JDJacopo Durante
Jacopo Durante
CPChiara Polito
Chiara Polito
ATAlessio Tognarelli
Alessio Tognarelli
DCDomenico Canale
Domenico Canale
RBRiccardo Bartoletti
Riccardo Bartoletti
BACKGROUND: Proxelan (R) and antibiotics combined therapy was successfully previously used in the treatment of symptoms of patients with chronic prostatitis. Aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of Proxelan (R) monotherapy on pain symptoms of patients with chronic prostatitis (CP) or chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) in a prospective pilot study. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with CP/CPPS symptoms younger than 50, without urinary obstruction, total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <4 ng/mL, negative microbiology testing on prostate fluid and urethral swab, naive from other treatments during the previous three months were enrolled in a pilot study. IPSS and NIII-CPSI questionnaires were administered to all the patients. Patients could choose to be investigated regarding semen quality and IL6/IL8 seminal markers for inflammatory disease prior and after the therapy course. Proxelan (R) suppositories were prescribed for each patient for a month with a daily dosage of I suppository at bed-time. The primary endpoint of the study included at least a 30% reduction of pain symptoms because similar results can be obtained in each previously investigated placebo group. Effects on semen parameters such as leukocytospermia, spermatozoa concentration and motility, cytokine levels were considered as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Subjective pain relief was obtained in all the patients with significant decrease of NIH-CPSI pain items (P=0.04). Urinary symptoms, investigated by IPSS questionnaire, decreased significantly (P.04) as well as quality of life items (P=0.04). Leukocytospennia was found in 5/15 patients available for further investigations. IL6 decreased by 11.55% one month after the treatment while sperm motility resulted increased by 17.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Proxelan (R) monotherapy may represents a promising valid alternative to combined treatment with antibiotics in patients with CP/CPPS symptoms although the results obtained should be investigated in randomized controlled trials.

9 October 2019 in European Urology Supplements
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GPG. Pomara
G. Pomara
TVTommaso Di Vico
Tommaso Di Vico
JDJ. Durante
J. Durante
LTL. Tesi
L. Tesi
IMIacopo Meneghetti
Iacopo Meneghetti
FFF. Francesca
F. Francesca