The clinical introduction of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) has stimulated the development of tests to quantify the effects of these drugs and manage complications associated with their use. Until recently, the only treatment choices for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in orthopedic surgical patients, as well as for stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation, were vitamin K antagonists, antiplatelet drugs, and unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparins. With the approval of NOACs, treatment options and consequent diagnostic challenges have expanded. To study the utility of thromboelastography (TEG) in monitoring and differentiating between 2 currently approved classes of NOACs, direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran) and factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban). Blood samples from healthy volunteers were spiked with each NOAC in both the presence and absence of ecarin, and the effects on TEG were evaluated. Both the kaolin test reaction time (R time) and the time to maximum rate of thrombus generation were prolonged versus control samples and demonstrated a dose response for apixaban (R time within the normal range) and dabigatran. The RapidTEG activated clotting time test allowed the creation of a dose-response curve for all 3 NOACs. In the presence of anti-Xa inhibitors, the ecarin test promoted significant shortening of kaolin R times to the hypercoagulable range, while in the presence of the direct thrombin inhibitor only small and dose-proportional R time shortening was observed. The RapidTEG activated clotting time test and the kaolin test appear to be capable of detecting and monitoring NOACs. The ecarin test may be used to differentiate between Xa inhibitors and direct thrombin inhibitors. Therefore, TEG may be a valuable tool to investigate hemostasis and the effectiveness of reversal strategies for patients receiving NOACs.

Essentials TEG-guided therapy has been shown to be valuable in a number of surgical settings. This systematic review and analysis specifically evaluated the effects of TEG-guided therapy. TEG-guided therapy can improve blood product utilization and enhance resource management. Use of TEG improved key patient outcomes, including bleed rate, length of stay and mortality. Thromboelastography (TEG 5000 and 6s Thrombelastograph Hemostasis Analyzer; Haemonetics) is a point-of-care system designed to monitor and analyze the entire coagulation process in real time. TEG-guided therapy has been shown to be valuable in a variety of surgical settings. To conduct an analysis of published clinical trials to evaluate the effects of TEG-guided transfusion for the management of perioperative bleeding on patient outcomes. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE for original articles reporting studies using TEG vs controls in a perioperative setting for inclusion in this systematic review. We identified nine eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in two elective surgery settings (cardiac surgery and liver surgery), but only one RCT in the emergency setting. In the elective surgery study meta-analysis, platelet (P = 0.004), plasma (P < 0.001) and red blood cell transfusion (P = 0.14), operating room length of stay (LoS) (P = 0.005), intensive care unit LoS (P = 0.04) and bleeding rate (P = 0.002) were reduced with TEG-guided transfusion vs controls. Although blood product use was reduced, rates of mortality remained comparable between the TEG group and control group. In the emergency setting evaluation, the RCT reported lower mortality in the TEG group than in the control group (P = 0.049). In addition, there were significant reductions in platelet and plasma transfusion (P = 0.04 and P = 0.02, respectively), and the number of ventilator-free days increased, in the TEG group as compared with the control group (P = 0.10). This systematic review and analysis indicate that TEG-guided hemostatic therapy can enhance blood product management and improve key patient outcomes, including LoS, bleeding rate, and mortality.

Viscoelastic-based techniques to evaluate whole blood hemostasis have advanced substantially since they were first developed over 70 years ago but are still based upon the techniques first described by Dr. Hellmut Hartert in 1948. Today, the use of thromboelastography, the method of testing viscoelastic properties of blood coagulation, has moved out of the research laboratory and is now more widespread, used commonly during surgery, in emergency departments, intensive care units, and in labor wards. Thromboelastography is currently a rapidly growing field of technological advancement and is attracting significant investment. This review will first describe the history of the viscoelastic testing and the established first-generation devices, which were developed for use within the laboratory. This review will then describe the next-generation hemostasis monitoring devices, which were developed for use at the site of care for an expanding range of clinical applications. This review will then move on to experimental technologies, which promise to make viscoelastic testing more readily available in a wider range of clinical environments in the endeavor to improve patient care.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated coagulopathy (CAC), characterized by hypercoagulability and an increased risk of thrombotic complications, is an important consideration in the management of patients with COVID-19. As COVID-19 is a new disease, no standard of care for the diagnosis or management of its associated coagulopathy is yet established. Whole blood viscoelastic tests, such as thromboelastography (TEG^® hemostasis analyzer), analyze whole blood to provide a complete overview of the coagulation status. We conducted a systematic review of thromboelastography for management of patients with COVID-19, using MEDLINE (PubMed) and Cochrane databases. TEG^® parameter measurements and clinical outcomes data were extracted for analysis. Our review found 15 publications, with overall results showing thromboelastography can identify and assess a hypercoagulable state in patients with COVID-19. Furthermore, utilization of thromboelastography in this patient population was shown to predict thrombotic complications. The benefits of thromboelastography presented here, in addition to advantages compared with laboratory coagulation tests, position thromboelastography as an important opportunity for optimizing diagnosis of CAC and improving patient management in COVID-19. Given that the benefits of thromboelastography have already been demonstrated in several other clinical applications, we anticipate that clinical data from future studies in patients with COVID-19 will further elucidate the optimal use of thromboelastography in this patient population.