Jeffrey Brunstrom

Prof. Jeffrey Brunstrom

University of Bristol
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2016 in Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GLGareth Leng
Gareth Leng
RARoger A. H. Adan
Roger A. H. Adan
MBMichele Belot
Michele Belot
JBJeffrey Brunstrom
Jeffrey Brunstrom
KGKees de Graaf
Kees de Graaf
PSPaul A. M. Smeets
Paul A. M. Smeets
Health nudge interventions to steer people into healthier lifestyles are increasingly applied by governments worldwide, and it is natural to look to such approaches to improve health by altering what people choose to eat. However, to produce policy recommendations that are likely to be effective, we need to be able to make valid predictions about the consequences of proposed interventions, and for this, we need a better understanding of the determinants of food choice. These determinants include dietary components (e.g. highly palatable foods and alcohol), but also diverse cultural and social pressures, cognitive-affective factors (perceived stress, health attitude, anxiety and depression), and familial, genetic and epigenetic influences on personality characteristics. In addition, our choices are influenced by an array of physiological mechanisms, including signals to the brain from the gastrointestinal tract and adipose tissue, which affect not only our hunger and satiety but also our motivation to eat particular nutrients, and the reward we experience from eating. Thus, to develop the evidence base necessary for effective policies, we need to build bridges across different levels of knowledge and understanding. This requires experimental models that can fill in the gaps in our understanding that are needed to inform policy, translational models that connect mechanistic understanding from laboratory studies to the real life human condition, and formal models that encapsulate scientific knowledge from diverse disciplines, and which embed understanding in a way that enables policy-relevant predictions to be made. Here we review recent developments in these areas.

16 March 2018 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMarta Lonnie
Marta Lonnie
EHEmma Hooker
Emma Hooker
JBJeffrey Brunstrom
Jeffrey Brunstrom
BCBernard Corfe
Bernard Corfe
MGMark Green
Mark Green
Alexandra JohnstoneAlexandra Johnstone
Alexandra Johnstone
With an ageing population, dietary approaches to promote health and independence later in life are needed. In part, this can be achieved by maintaining muscle mass and strength as people age. New evidence suggests that current dietary recommendations for protein intake may be insufficient to achieve this goal and that individuals might benefit by increasing their intake and frequency of consumption of high-quality protein. However, the environmental effects of increasing animal-protein production are a concern, and alternative, more sustainable protein sources should be considered. Protein is known to be more satiating than other macronutrients, and it is unclear whether diets high in plant proteins affect the appetite of older adults as they should be recommended for individuals at risk of malnutrition. The review considers the protein needs of an ageing population (>40 years old), sustainable protein sources, appetite-related implications of diets high in plant proteins, and related areas for future research.

1 November 2008 in Appetite
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJeffrey Brunstrom
Jeffrey Brunstrom
NSNicholas G. Shakeshaft
Nicholas G. Shakeshaft
NSNicholas E. Scott-Samuel
Nicholas E. Scott-Samuel

15 June 2010 in International Journal of Obesity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DFDanielle Ferriday
Danielle Ferriday
JBJeffrey Brunstrom
Jeffrey Brunstrom

1 October 2009 in Obesity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJeffrey Brunstrom
Jeffrey Brunstrom
PRPeter J. Rogers
Peter J. Rogers

18 May 2020 in Journal of the American Heart Association
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AWAlexis C. Wood
Alexis C. Wood
JBJacqueline M. Blissett
Jacqueline M. Blissett
JBJeffrey Brunstrom
Jeffrey Brunstrom
SCSusan Carnell
Susan Carnell
MFMyles S. Faith
Myles S. Faith
SCStroke Council
Stroke Council
A substantial body of research suggests that efforts to prevent pediatric obesity may benefit from targeting not just what a child eats, but how they eat. Specifically, child obesity prevention should include a component that addresses reasons why children have differing abilities to start and stop eating in response to internal cues of hunger and satiety, a construct known as eating self‐regulation . This review summarizes current knowledge regarding how caregivers can be an important influence on children's eating self‐regulation during early childhood. First, we discuss the evidence supporting an association between caregiver feeding and child eating self‐regulation. Second, we discuss what implications the current evidence has for actions caregivers may be able to take to support children's eating self‐regulation. Finally, we consider the broader social, economic, and cultural context around the feeding environment relationship and how this intersects with the implementation of any actions. As far as we are aware, this is the first American Heart Association (AHA) scientific statement to focus on a psychobehavioral approach to reducing obesity risk in young children. It is anticipated that the timely information provided in this review can be used not only by caregivers within the immediate and extended family but also by a broad range of community‐based care providers.