Luís Gondim

Dr. Luís Gondim


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2013 in International Journal for Parasitology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Michael ReichelMichael Reichel
Michael Reichel
MAM. Alejandra Ayanegui-Alcérreca
M. Alejandra Ayanegui-Alcérreca
LGLuís Gondim
Luís Gondim
JEJohn Ellis
John Ellis

1 February 2004 in International Journal for Parasitology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LGLuís Gondim
Luís Gondim
MMMilton McAllister
Milton McAllister
WPWilliam C Pitt
William C Pitt
DZDoris E Zemlicka
Doris E Zemlicka

1 June 2006 in Trends in Parasitology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LGLuís Gondim
Luís Gondim

28 February 2017 in Parasitology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLuís Gondim
Luís Gondim
JMJose Roberto Mineo
Jose Roberto Mineo
Gereon ScharesGereon Schares
Gereon Schares
SUMMARY: Toxoplasma gondii, Neosporaspp.,Sarcocystisspp.,Hammondiaspp. andBesnoitia besnoitiare genetically related cyst-forming coccidia. Serology is frequently used for the identification ofT. gondii, Neosporaspp. andB. besnoiti-exposed individuals. Serologic cross-reactions occur in different tests among animals infected withT. gondiiandH. hammondi,as well as among animals infected byT. gondiiandN. caninum. Infections caused byN. caninumandN. hughesiare almost indistinguishable by serology.Neospora caninum, B. besnoitiandSarcocystisspp. infections in cattle show some degree of serologic cross-reactivity. Antibody cross-reactivity betweenNeosporaspp. andH. heydorni-infected animals is suspected, but not proven to occur. We review serologic cross-reactivity among animals and/or humans infected withT. gondii, Neosporaspp.,Sarcocystisspp.,Hammondiaspp. andB. besnoiti. Emphasis is laid upon antigens and serological methods forN. caninumdiagnosis which were tested for cross-reactivity with related protozoa. Species-specific antigens, as well as stage-specific proteins have been identified in some of these parasites and have promising use for diagnosis and epidemiological surveys.

1 May 1999 in Veterinary Parasitology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LGLuís Gondim
Luís Gondim
HBH.V. Barbosa
H.V. Barbosa
CFC.H.A. Ribeiro Filho
C.H.A. Ribeiro Filho
HSH. Saeki
H. Saeki

1 December 2004 in Journal of Parasitology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LGLuís Gondim
Luís Gondim
MMMilton McAllister
Milton McAllister
NMNohra Mateus-Pinilla
Nohra Mateus-Pinilla
WPW. C. Pitt
W. C. Pitt
LML. D. Mech
L. D. Mech
MNM. E. Nelson
M. E. Nelson
To determine whether deer can transmit Neospora caninum, brains of naturally infected white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) were fed to 4 dogs; 2 of these dogs shed oocysts. Oocysts from 1 of the dogs were tested by polymerase chain reaction and found to be positive for N. caninum and negative for Hammondia heydorni. The internal transcribed spacer 1 sequence of the new strain (designated NC-deer1) was identical to N. caninum from domestic animals, indicating that N. caninum is transmitted between wild and domestic animals, often enough to prevent divergent evolution of isolated populations of the parasite. NC-deerl oocysts were administered to a calf that developed a high antibody titer, providing evidence that N. caninum from wildlife can infect cattle. In addition, N. caninum antibody seroprevalence was detected in 64/164 (39%) free-ranging gray wolves (Canis lupus), 12/113 (11%) coyotes (Canis latrans), 50/193 (26%) white-tailed deer, and 8/61 (13%) moose (Alces alces). These data are consistent with a sylvatic transmission cycle of N. caninum between cervids and canids. We speculate that hunting by humans favors the transmission of N. caninum from deer to canids, because deer carcasses are usually eviscerated in the field. Infection of canids in turn increases the risk of transmitting the parasite to domestic livestock.