Annette Chakera

Annette Chakera

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 August 2009 in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ACAnnette Chakera
Annette Chakera
BHBirger Hesse
Birger Hesse
ZBZeynep Burak
Zeynep Burak
JBJames R Ballinger
James R Ballinger
ABAllan Britten
Allan Britten
EAEuropean Association of Nuclear Medicine-European Organisation for Research and
European Association of Nuclear Medicine-European Organisation for Research and

25 July 2015 in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CBChristina Bluemel
Christina Bluemel
KHKen Herrmann
Ken Herrmann
FGFrancesco Giammarile
Francesco Giammarile
ONOmgo E. Nieweg
Omgo E. Nieweg
JDJulien Dubreuil
Julien Dubreuil
Domenico RubelloDomenico Rubello
Domenico Rubello

1 September 2000 in Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EMEugene N. Myers
Eugene N. Myers
SSSven‐Eric Stangerup
Sven‐Eric Stangerup
DDDominika Drozdziewicz
Dominika Drozdziewicz
MTMirko Tos
Mirko Tos
ACAnnette Chakera
Annette Chakera
One problem in cholesteatoma surgery is recurrence of cholesteatoma, which is reported to vary from 5% to 71%. This great variability can be explained by issues such as the type of cholesteatoma, surgical technique, follow‐up rate, length of the postoperative observation period, and statistical method applied. The aim of this study was to illustrate the impact of applying different statistical methods to the same material. Thirty‐three children underwent single‐stage surgery for attic cholesteatoma during a 15‐year period. Thirty patients (94%) attended a re‐evaluation. During the observation period of 15 years, recurrence of cholesteatoma occurred in 10 ears. The cumulative total recurrence rate varied from 30% to 67%, depending on the statistical method applied. In conclusion, the choice of statistical method should depend on the number of patients, follow‐up rates, length of the postoperative observation period and presence of censored data.

5 October 2004 in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ACAnnette Chakera
Annette Chakera
EFE. Friis
E. Friis
UHU. Hesse
U. Hesse
NAN. Al-Suliman
N. Al-Suliman
BZBo Zerahn
Bo Zerahn
BHB. Hesse
B. Hesse

18 December 2018 in Annals of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ACAnnette Chakera
Annette Chakera
MQMichael J. Quinn
Michael J. Quinn
SLSerigne Lo
Serigne Lo
MDMartin Drummond
Martin Drummond
LHLauren E. Haydu
Lauren E. Haydu
JTJohn F. Thompson
John F. Thompson

21 June 2005 in Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TKT. L. Klausen
T. L. Klausen
ACAnnette Chakera
Annette Chakera
EFE. Friis
E. Friis
FRF. Rank
F. Rank
BHB. Hesse
B. Hesse
SHS. Holm
S. Holm