Siegfried Krauss

Prof. Siegfried Krauss

Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2012 in BioScience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GKGary Kendrick
Gary Kendrick
MWMichelle Waycott
Michelle Waycott
TCTim J. B. Carruthers
Tim J. B. Carruthers
MCMarion L. Cambridge
Marion L. Cambridge
RHRenae Hovey
Renae Hovey
JVJennifer J. Verduin
Jennifer J. Verduin
Global seagrass losses parallel significant declines observed in corals and mangroves over the past 50 years. These combined declines have resulted in accelerated global losses to ecosystem services in coastal waters. Seagrass meadows can be extensive (hundreds of square kilometers) and long-lived (thousands of years), with the meadows persisting predominantly through vegetative (clonal) growth. They also invest a large amount of energy in sexual reproduction. In this article, we explore the role that sexual reproduction, pollen, and seed dispersal play in maintaining species distributions, genetic diversity, and connectivity among seagrass populations. We also address the relationship between long-distance dispersal, genetic connectivity, and the maintenance of genetic diversity that may enhance resilience to stresses associated with seagrass loss. Our reevaluation of seagrass dispersal and recruitment has altered our perception of the importance of long-distance dispersal and has revealed extensive dispersal at scales much larger than was previously thought possible.Gary A. Kendrick, Michelle Waycott, Tim J. B. Carruthers, Marion L. Cambridge, Renae Hovey, Siegfried L. Krauss, Paul S. Lavery, Donald H. Les, Ryan J. Lowe, Oriol Mascaró I Vidal, Jillian L. S. Ooi, Robert J. Orth, David O. Rivers, Leonardo Ruiz-Montoya, Elizabeth A. Sinclair, John Statton, Jent Kornelis van Dijk and Jennifer J. Verdui

22 November 2014 in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KMKathryn McMahon
Kathryn McMahon
KDKor-Jent van Dijk
Kor-Jent van Dijk
LRLeonardo Ruiz-Montoya
Leonardo Ruiz-Montoya
GKGary Kendrick
Gary Kendrick
SKSiegfried Krauss
Siegfried Krauss
CDCarlos M Duarte
Carlos M Duarte
A movement ecology framework is applied to enhance our understanding of the causes, mechanisms and consequences of movement in seagrasses: marine, clonal, flowering plants. Four life-history stages of seagrasses can move: pollen, sexual propagules, vegetative fragments and the spread of individuals through clonal growth. Movement occurs on the water surface, in the water column, on or in the sediment, via animal vectors and through spreading clones. A capacity for long-distance dispersal and demographic connectivity over multiple timeframes is the novel feature of the movement ecology of seagrasses with significant evolutionary and ecological consequences. The space–time movement footprint of different life-history stages varies. For example, the distance moved by reproductive propagules and vegetative expansion via clonal growth is similar, but the timescales range exponentially, from hours to months or centuries to millennia, respectively. Consequently, environmental factors and key traits that interact to influence movement also operate on vastly different spatial and temporal scales. Six key future research areas have been identified.

15 December 2016 in Restoration Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BMBen P. Miller
Ben P. Miller
ESElizabeth A. Sinclair
Elizabeth A. Sinclair
MMMyles H. M. Menz
Myles H. M. Menz
CECarole P. Elliott
Carole P. Elliott
EBEric Bunn
Eric Bunn
JSJason C. Stevens
Jason C. Stevens
Demand for restoration of resilient, self‐sustaining, and biodiverse natural ecosystems as a conservation measure is increasing globally; however, restoration efforts frequently fail to meet standards appropriate for this objective. Achieving these standards requires management underpinned by input from diverse scientific disciplines including ecology, biotechnology, engineering, soil science, ecophysiology, and genetics. Despite increasing restoration research activity, a gap between the immediate needs of restoration practitioners and the outputs of restoration science often limits the effectiveness of restoration programs. Regrettably, studies often fail to identify the practical issues most critical for restoration success. We propose that part of this oversight may result from the absence of a considered statement of the necessary practical restoration science questions. Here we develop a comprehensive framework of the research required to bridge this gap and guide effective restoration. We structure questions in five themes: (1) setting targets and planning for success, (2) sourcing biological material, (3) optimizing establishment, (4) facilitating growth and survival, and (5) restoring resilience, sustainability, and landscape integration. This framework will assist restoration practitioners and scientists to identify knowledge gaps and develop strategic research focused on applied outcomes. The breadth of questions highlights the importance of cross‐discipline collaboration among restoration scientists, and while the program is broad, successful restoration projects have typically invested in many or most of these themes. Achieving restoration ecology's goal of averting biodiversity losses is a vast challenge: investment in appropriate science is urgently needed for ecological restoration to fulfill its potential and meet demand as a conservation tool.

1 September 2000 in Molecular Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SKSiegfried Krauss
Siegfried Krauss

1 July 2003 in Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BLByron Lamont
Byron Lamont
THT. He
T. He
NEN. J. Enright
N. J. Enright
SKSiegfried Krauss
Siegfried Krauss
BMB. P. Miller
B. P. Miller

1 May 2017 in Trends in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SKSiegfried Krauss
Siegfried Krauss
RPRyan D. Phillips
Ryan D. Phillips
JKJeffrey D. Karron
Jeffrey D. Karron
SJSteven D. Johnson
Steven D. Johnson
DRDavid G. Roberts
David G. Roberts
SHStephen Hopper
Stephen Hopper
Pollinator behaviour has profound effects on plant mating. Pollinators are predicted to minimise energetic costs during foraging bouts by moving between nearby flowers. However, a review of plant mating system studies reveals a mismatch between behavioural predictions and pollen-mediated gene dispersal in bird-pollinated plants. Paternal diversity of these plants is twice that of plants pollinated solely by insects. Comparison with the behaviour of other pollinator groups suggests that birds promote pollen dispersal through a combination of high mobility, limited grooming, and intra- and interspecies aggression. Future opportunities to test these predictions include seed paternity assignment following pollinator exclusion experiments, single pollen grain genotyping, new tracking technologies for small pollinators, and motion-triggered cameras and ethological experimentation for quantifying pollinator behaviour.