Alejandro Arias Vasquez

Dr. Alejandro Arias Vasquez


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 April 2012 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
T(The Alzheimer'S Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (Adni)
The Alzheimer'S Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (Adni)
JSJason L Stein
Jason L Stein
ECEPIGEN Consortium
EPIGEN Consortium
ICIMAGEN Consortium
IMAGEN Consortium
S(Saguenay Youth Study Group (SYS)
Saguenay Youth Study Group (SYS)
PTPaul M. Thompson
Paul M. Thompson
Paul Thompson and colleagues report a genome-wide association study for hippocampal, intracranial and total brain volume. They identify a locus at 12q24 associated with hippocampal volume and a locus at 12q14 associated with intracranial volume. Identifying genetic variants influencing human brain structures may reveal new biological mechanisms underlying cognition and neuropsychiatric illness. The volume of the hippocampus is a biomarker of incipient Alzheimer's disease1,2 and is reduced in schizophrenia3, major depression4 and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy5. Whereas many brain imaging phenotypes are highly heritable6,7, identifying and replicating genetic influences has been difficult, as small effects and the high costs of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have led to underpowered studies. Here we report genome-wide association meta-analyses and replication for mean bilateral hippocampal, total brain and intracranial volumes from a large multinational consortium. The intergenic variant rs7294919 was associated with hippocampal volume (12q24.22; N = 21,151; P = 6.70 × 10−16) and the expression levels of the positional candidate gene TESC in brain tissue. Additionally, rs10784502, located within HMGA2, was associated with intracranial volume (12q14.3; N = 15,782; P = 1.12 × 10−12). We also identified a suggestive association with total brain volume at rs10494373 within DDR2 (1q23.3; N = 6,500; P = 5.81 × 10−7).

14 October 2008 in Molecular Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MVM Verhagen
M Verhagen
AMA van der Meij
A van der Meij
PDP A M van Deurzen
P A M van Deurzen
JJJ G E Janzing
J G E Janzing
AVAlejandro Arias Vasquez
Alejandro Arias Vasquez
BFB Franke
B Franke

26 September 2008 in American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJessica Lasky‐Su
Jessica Lasky‐Su
BNBenjamin M. Neale
Benjamin M. Neale
BFBarbara Franke
Barbara Franke
RARichard J.L. Anney
Richard J.L. Anney
KZKaixin Zhou
Kaixin Zhou
SFStephen V. V Faraone
Stephen V. V Faraone

3 November 2008 in American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BNBenjamin M. Neale
Benjamin M. Neale
JLJessica Lasky‐Su
Jessica Lasky‐Su
RARichard Anney
Richard Anney
BFBarbara Franke
Barbara Franke
KZKaixin Zhou
Kaixin Zhou
SFStephen V. V Faraone
Stephen V. V Faraone
Results of behavioral genetic and molecular genetic studies have converged to suggest that genes substantially contribute to the development of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), a common disorder with an onset in childhood. Yet, despite numerous linkage and candidate gene studies, strongly consistent and replicable association has eluded detection. To search for ADHD susceptibility genes, we genotyped approximately 600,000 SNPs in 958 ADHD affected family trios. After cleaning the data, we analyzed 438,784 SNPs in 2,803 individuals comprising 909 complete trios using ADHD diagnosis as phenotype. We present the initial TDT findings as well as considerations for cleaning family‐based TDT data. None of the SNP association tests achieved genome‐wide significance, indicating that larger samples may be required to identify risk loci for ADHD. We additionally identify a systemic bias in family‐based association, and suggest that variable missing genotype rates may be the source of this bias.

10 September 2021 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJip Gudden
Jip Gudden
AVAlejandro Arias Vasquez
Alejandro Arias Vasquez
MBMirjam Bloemendaal
Mirjam Bloemendaal
The importance of diet and the gut-brain axis for brain health and cognitive function is increasingly acknowledged. Dietary interventions are tested for their potential to prevent and/or treat brain disorders. Intermittent fasting (IF), the abstinence or strong limitation of calories for 12 to 48 h, alternated with periods of regular food intake, has shown promising results on neurobiological health in animal models. In this review article, we discuss the potential benefits of IF on cognitive function and the possible effects on the prevention and progress of brain-related disorders in animals and humans. We do so by summarizing the effects of IF which through metabolic, cellular, and circadian mechanisms lead to anatomical and functional changes in the brain. Our review shows that there is no clear evidence of a positive short-term effect of IF on cognition in healthy subjects. Clinical studies show benefits of IF for epilepsy, Alzheimer’s disease, and multiple sclerosis on disease symptoms and progress. Findings from animal studies show mechanisms by which Parkinson’s disease, ischemic stroke, autism spectrum disorder, and mood and anxiety disorders could benefit from IF. Future research should disentangle whether positive effects of IF hold true regardless of age or the presence of obesity. Moreover, variations in fasting patterns, total caloric intake, and intake of specific nutrients may be relevant components of IF success. Longitudinal studies and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) will provide a window into the long-term effects of IF on the development and progress of brain-related diseases.

4 November 2009 in Neuropsychopharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BFBarbara Franke
Barbara Franke
AVAlejandro Arias Vasquez
Alejandro Arias Vasquez
SJStefan Johansson
Stefan Johansson
MHMartine Hoogman
Martine Hoogman
JRJasmin Romanos
Jasmin Romanos
ARAndreas Reif
Andreas Reif
Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common neuropsychiatric disorders with a worldwide prevalence around 4–5% in children and 1–4% in adults. Although ADHD is highly heritable and familial risk may contribute most strongly to the persistent form of the disorder, there are few studies on the genetics of ADHD in adults. In this paper, we present the first results of the International Multicentre Persistent ADHD Genetics CollaboraTion (IMpACT) that has been set up with the goal of performing research into the genetics of persistent ADHD. In this study, we carried out a combined analysis as well as a meta-analysis of the association of the SLC6A3/DAT1 gene with persistent ADHD in 1440 patients and 1769 controls from IMpACT and an earlier report. DAT1, encoding the dopamine transporter, is one of the most frequently studied genes in ADHD, though results have been inconsistent. A variable number tandem repeat polymorphism (VNTR) in the 3′-untranslated region (UTR) of the gene and, more recently, a haplotype of this VNTR with another VNTR in intron 8 have been the target of most studies. Although the 10/10 genotype of the 3′-UTR VNTR and the 10-6 haplotype of the two VNTRs are thought to be risk factors for ADHD in children, we found the 9/9 genotype and the 9-6 haplotype associated with persistent ADHD. In conclusion, a differential association of DAT1 with ADHD in children and in adults might help explain the inconsistencies observed in earlier association studies. However, the data might also imply that DAT1 has a modulatory rather than causative role in ADHD.