We have previously shown that Toll-like receptor (TLR)-activated murine nonparenchymal liver cells [(NPC); Kupffer cells (KC), liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSEC)] can suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether HBV has the ability to counteract the TLR-mediated control of its replication. Freshly purified murine hepatocytes and NPCs obtained from C57BL6 mice were stimulated by TLR 1-9 ligands in the presence or absence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), HBV virions, or supernatants from HBV-producing HBV-Met cells, and HBV replication was suppressed by anti- hepatitis B virus X protein (HBx) small interfering RNA (siRNA) in HBV-Met cells. Supernatants were collected and tested for antiviral cytokines by viral protection assay. HBV gene expression and replication was analyzed by southern blot. RNA and proteins were analyzed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or western blot and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. Pretreatment of hepatocytes and NPCs with HBV-Met cells supernatants, HBsAg, HBeAg, or HBV virions almost completely abrogated TLR-induced antiviral activity, which correlated with suppression of interferon beta (IFN-β) production and subsequent interferon-stimulated gene induction as well as suppressed activation of interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF-3), nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2. In HBV-infected HBV-Met cells, TLR stimulation did not induce antiviral cytokines in contrast to primary hepatocytes. TLR-stimulated expression of proinflammatory cytokines [tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6)], and activation of IRF-3 was suppressed after up-regulation of HBV replication in HBV-Met cells. Accordingly, suppression of HBV replication by siRNA led to activation or expression of proinflammatory transcription factors and cytokines. Conclusion: Our data indicate that HBV can suppress the TLR-induced antiviral activity of liver cells. This has major implications for the interaction between HBV and the immune system. (Hepatology 2009.)
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one of the most frequent causes of chronic liver disease worldwide. Because recent studies have suggested that Toll-like receptor (TLR)-based therapies may be a promising approach in the treatment of HBV infection, we studied the role of the local innate immune system of the liver as a possible mediator of this effect. Murine nonparenchymal cells, including Kupffer cells (KCs) and sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs), were isolated from C57/BL6 wild-type or MyD88−/− mice and stimulated by agonists of TLR1 to TLR9. Supernatants were harvested and assayed for their antiviral activity against HBV in HBV-Met cells. No direct antiviral effect of TLR agonists could be observed. In controls (myeloid dendritic cells), TLR1, TLR3, TLR4, TLR7, and TLR9 activation lead to production of antiviral cytokines. By contrast, only supernatants from TLR3-stimulated and TLR4-stimulated KCs and TLR3-stimulated LSECs from wild-type mice were able to potently suppress HBV replication as assessed via Southern blotting. Similar results were found with cells from MyD88−/− mice, indicating that the effect was independent of this signaling pathway. Cellular HBV RNA and hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis B e antigen levels in supernatants remained unchanged. Using neutralizing antibodies, we demonstrated that the TLR3-mediated effect but not the TLR4-mediated effect is mediated exclusively through interferon-β.
Conclusion:
Our data indicate that the innate immune system of the liver can control HBV replication after activation by TLR agonists. This has implications for the development of TLR-based therapeutic approaches against HBV. (Hepatology 2007.)
Glucose metabolism and innate immunity evolved side-by-side. It is unclear if and how the two systems interact with each other during hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections and, if so, which mechanisms are involved. Here, we report that HBV activates glycolysis to impede retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-induced interferon production. We demonstrate that HBV sequesters MAVS from RIG-I by forming a ternary complex including hexokinase (HK). Using a series of pharmacological and genetic approaches, we provide in vitro and in vivo evidence indicating that HBV suppresses RLR signaling via lactate dehydrogenase-A-dependent lactate production. Lactate directly binds MAVS preventing its aggregation and mitochondrial localization during HBV infection. Therefore, we show that HK2 and glycolysis-derived lactate have important functions in the immune escape of HBV and that energy metabolism regulates innate immunity during HBV infection.
Background Non-response to combination therapy by patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) has previously been associated with a strong hepatic upregulation of interferon stimulated genes (ISGs) including ISG15. Therefore, the aim of this study was to further elucidate the functional role of this molecule. Methods ISG15 expression was suppressed by siRNAs or enhanced by over-expression in genomic and subgenomic human or murine HCV replicon systems. In addition, ISG15 expression was analysed in liver samples of patients with HCV prior to antiviral therapy and correlated with clinical and virological parameters. Results Short- or long-term knockdown of ISG15 expression suppressed HCV replication comparable to IFNs without evidence for the induction of resistant mutations. Triple therapy consisting of ISG15 knockdown, interferon α (IFNα) and ribavirin led to complete suppression of the HCV NS5A protein, corresponding to 99% suppression of HCV-RNA compared to 75% suppression by IFNα and ribavirin only. Combination treatment of ISG15 knockdown and IFN was associated with enhanced and prolonged expression of selected ISGs. Consistent with these in vitro data, high hepatic ISG15 levels correlated with the unfavourable HCV genotype 1, a high hepatic HCV load and a low antiviral response to IFN during the initial phase of treatment. Conclusions ISG15 plays an important role in the HCV replication cycle. Therefore, therapies based on the suppression of ISG15 may provide a promising strategy to overcome non-response to standard combination treatment in the future. Furthermore, analysis of ISG15 prior to therapy may be useful to predict short-term and long-term outcome and thus tailor antiviral therapy with pegIFN and ribavirin.
Previous studies have demonstrated that nucleic acid polymers (NAPs) have both entry and post-entry inhibitory activity against duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) infection. The inhibitory activity exhibited by NAPs prevented DHBV infection of primary duck hepatocytes in vitro and protected ducks from DHBV infection in vivo and did not result from direct activation of the immune response. In the current study treatment of primary human hepatocytes with NAP REP 2055 did not induce expression of the TNF, IL6, IL10, IFNA4 or IFNB1 genes, confirming the lack of direct immunostimulation by REP 2055. Ducks with persistent DHBV infection were treated with NAP 2055 to determine if the post-entry inhibitory activity exhibited by NAPs could provide a therapeutic effect against established DHBV infection in vivo. In all REP 2055-treated ducks, 28 days of treatment lead to initial rapid reductions in serum DHBsAg and DHBV DNA and increases in anti-DHBs antibodies. After treatment, 6/11 ducks experienced a sustained virologic response: DHBsAg and DHBV DNA remained at low or undetectable levels in the serum and no DHBsAg or DHBV core antigen positive hepatocytes and only trace amounts of DHBV total and covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) were detected in the liver at 9 or 16 weeks of follow-up. In the remaining 5/11 REP 2055-treated ducks, all markers of DHBV infection rapidly rebounded after treatment withdrawal: At 9 and 16 weeks of follow-up, levels of DHBsAg and DHBcAg and DHBV total and cccDNA in the liver had rebounded and matched levels observed in the control ducks treated with normal saline which remained persistently infected with DHBV. These data demonstrate that treatment with the NAP REP 2055 can lead to sustained control of persistent DHBV infection. These effects may be related to the unique ability of REP 2055 to block release of DHBsAg from infected hepatocytes.