Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal timing for the resection of heterotopic ossification (HO) of the elbow. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 42 patients who were treated operatively for heterotopic ossification of the elbow from March 2010 to December 2014 at our institution. The patients were divided into early (before 12 months) and late (after 12 months) excision groups. In the early excision group (17 patients), the average time from the initial injury to HO excision was 7.4 (3–11) months, and in the late excision group (25 patients), the average time was 33.5 (12–240) months. Every patient was evaluated by range of motion (ROM), the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), postoperative complications and HO recurrence. Results The preoperative mean ROM in the late excision group was greater than that of the early excision group, suggesting that the ROM is expected to increase even without surgery. Both early and late surgery increased ROM and MEPS, but early surgery improved ROM and MEPS more than late surgery did (p < .05). Conclusions Early excision of HO can provide better elbow function, as indicated by ROM and MEPS. Considering that there were no notable differences in postoperative ROM and MEPS, HO recurrence, or postoperative complications, we concluded that early excision is safe and that the time from an elbow injury to surgery may be shortened. Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study. ER - Keywords Elbow Heterotopic ossification Trauma Timing of excision

Capitellum and trochlea fractures are truly rare and the treatment is not fully appreciated. So we evaluate the impact of associated injuries and fracture classifications on elbow functional outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation. PubMed, Embase, Ovid Medline, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 1974 to January 1, 2017. All English literature with the treatment of capitellum and trochlea fractures by open reduction and internal fixation were included. For associated injuries, the results suggested that the MEPI score of patients without associated injuries was higher than that of patients with associated injuries (P = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the arc of motion between the two groups (P = 0.052). For Bryan and Morrey classification, there was no significant difference in the MEPI score (P = 0.622) and in the arc of motion (P = 0.652) between type-I fractures and type-IV fractures. For Dubberley classification, there was significant difference only in the MEPI score between subtype-A fractures and subtype-B fractures (P = 0.005). The associated injury of fracture may have a negative impact on the functional outcomes of elbow. And Dubberley classification is more suitable to classify this kind of fracture. Furthermore, high-quality studies are required to attain robust evidence.

The biomechanical characteristics of tendon grafts is essential for tendon reconstructive surgery due to its great role in providing a good mechanical environment for tendon healing and regeneration. In our previous studies, the decellularized tendon slices (DTSs) and decellularized bovine tendon sheets (DBTSs) scaffolds were successfully developed. However, the influence of the integrity of tendinous membrane (endotenon and epitenon) and fascicle on biomechanical characteristics of these two scaffolds was not investigated. In this study, we assessed the integrity of tendinous membrane and fascicle of the tendon derived scaffolds and its effect on the biomechanical characteristics. The results of histological staining indicated that the DBTSs had complete endotenon and epitenon, while DTSs had no epitenon at all, only part of endotenon was remained. Furthermore, the DBTSs, and DTSs with thickness of 900 μ m had complete fascicles, while DTSs with thickness less than 600 μ m had almost no complete fascicles. The fibrous configuration of epitenon was well-preserved in the surface of the DBTSs but the surface ultrastructure of the DTSs was aligned collagen fibers based on scanning electron microscopy examination. The results of transmission electron microscopy showed that there was no significant difference between the DBTSs and DTSs. Mechanically, the DBTSs and DTSs with thickness of 900 μ m showed similar ultimate tensile strength and stiffness to native tendon segments (NTSs). The strain at break and suture retention strength of the DBTSs showed much higher than that of the DTSs (p < 0.05). Additionally, the DBTSs showed higher ultimate load than the DTSs when these scaffolds were sutured with NTSs (p < 0.05) through the modified Kessler technique based on a uniaxial tensile test. This study demonstrated that DTSs may be used as a patch for reinforcing tendon repair, while DBTSs may be used as a bridge for reconstructing tendon defects.