Amy White

Ms. Amy White

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 January 2012 in Genetics in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YMYoav H. Messinger
Yoav H. Messinger
NMNancy J. Mendelsohn
Nancy J. Mendelsohn
WRWilliam Rhead
William Rhead
DDDavid Dimmock
David Dimmock
EHEli Hershkovitz
Eli Hershkovitz
PKPriya S. Kishnani
Priya S. Kishnani
Purpose: Infantile Pompe disease resulting from a deficiency of lysosomal acid α-glucosidase (GAA) requires enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with recombinant human GAA (rhGAA). Cross-reactive immunologic material negative (CRIM-negative) Pompe patients develop high-titer antibody to the rhGAA and do poorly. We describe successful tolerance induction in CRIM-negative patients. Methods: Two CRIM-negative patients with preexisting anti-GAA antibodies were treated therapeutically with rituximab, methotrexate, and gammaglobulins. Two additional CRIM-negative patients were treated prophylactically with a short course of rituximab and methotrexate, in parallel with initiating rhGAA. Results: In both patients treated therapeutically, anti-rhGAA was eliminated after 3 and 19 months. All four patients are immune tolerant to rhGAA, off immune therapy, showing B-cell recovery while continuing to receive ERT at ages 36 and 56 months (therapeutic) and 18 and 35 months (prophylactic). All patients show clinical response to ERT, in stark contrast to the rapid deterioration of their nontolerized CRIM-negative counterparts. Conclusion: The combination of rituximab with methotrexate ± intravenous gammaglobulins (IVIG) is an option for tolerance induction of CRIM-negative Pompe to ERT when instituted in the naïve setting or following antibody development. It should be considered in other conditions in which antibody response to the therapeutic protein elicits robust antibody response that interferes with product efficacy. Genet Med 2012:14(1):135–142

27 January 2003 in American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Amy WhiteAmy White
Amy White
PMPeggy Modaff
Peggy Modaff
FHFrancesca Holland‐Morris
Francesca Holland‐Morris
RPRichard M. Pauli
Richard M. Pauli

24 February 2020 in Genetics in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AGAdam J. Guenzel
Adam J. Guenzel
CTColeman T. Turgeon
Coleman T. Turgeon
KNKim K. Nickander
Kim K. Nickander
Amy WhiteAmy White
Amy White
DPDawn S. Peck
Dawn S. Peck
DMDietrich Matern
Dietrich Matern

1 August 2021 in The American Journal of the Medical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KAKarl Elmo Anderson
Karl Elmo Anderson
RLRaynah Lobo
Raynah Lobo
DSDenise Salazar
Denise Salazar
MSMary Schloetter
Mary Schloetter
GSGary Spitzer
Gary Spitzer
STSilvia Tortorelli
Silvia Tortorelli
Acute hepatic porphyria (AHP) is a group of rare, metabolic diseases where patients can experience acute neurovisceral attacks, chronic symptoms, and long-term complications. Diagnostic biochemical testing is widely available and effective, but a substantial time from symptom onset to diagnosis often delays treatment and increases morbidity. A panel of laboratory scientists and clinical AHP specialists collaborated to produce recommendations on how to enhance biochemical diagnosis of AHP in the USA. AHP should be considered in the differential diagnosis of unexplained abdominal pain, the most common symptom, soon after excluding common causes. Measurement of porphobilinogen (PBG) and porphyrins in a random urine sample, with results normalized to creatinine, is recommended as an effective and cost-efficient initial test for AHP. Delta-aminolevulinic acid testing may be included but is not essential. The optimal time to collect a urine sample is during an attack. Substantial PBG elevation confirms an AHP diagnosis and allows for prompt treatment initiation. Additional testing can determine AHP subtype and identify at-risk family members. Increased awareness of AHP and correct diagnostic methods will reduce diagnostic delay and improve patient outcomes.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DPDawn Peck
Dawn Peck
JLJean M. Lacey
Jean M. Lacey
Amy WhiteAmy White
Amy White
GPGisele Pino
Gisele Pino
ASApril L. Studinski
April L. Studinski
STSilvia Tortorelli
Silvia Tortorelli
Enzyme-based newborn screening for Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) has a high false-positive rate due to the prevalence of pseudodeficiency alleles, often resulting in unnecessary and costly follow up. The glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), dermatan sulfate (DS) and heparan sulfate (HS) are both substrates for α-l-iduronidase (IDUA). These GAGs are elevated in patients with MPS I and have been shown to be promising biomarkers for both primary and second-tier testing. Since February 2016, we have measured DS and HS in 1213 specimens submitted on infants at risk for MPS I based on newborn screening. Molecular correlation was available for 157 of the tested cases. Samples from infants with MPS I confirmed by IDUA molecular analysis all had significantly elevated levels of DS and HS compared to those with confirmed pseudodeficiency and/or heterozygosity. Analysis of our testing population and correlation with molecular results identified few discrepant outcomes and uncovered no evidence of false-negative cases. We have demonstrated that blood spot GAGs analysis accurately discriminates between patients with confirmed MPS I and false-positive cases due to pseudodeficiency or heterozygosity and increases the specificity of newborn screening for MPS I.

5 July 2022 in Journal of Medical Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSShino Shimada
Shino Shimada
BNBobby G Ng
Bobby G Ng
Amy WhiteAmy White
Amy White
KNKim K Nickander
Kim K Nickander
CTColeman Turgeon
Coleman Turgeon
LWLynne A Wolfe
Lynne A Wolfe
Purpose: To summarise the clinical, molecular and biochemical phenotype of mannosyl-oligosaccharide glucosidase-related congenital disorders of glycosylation (MOGS-CDG), which presents with variable clinical manifestations, and to analyse which clinical biochemical assay consistently supports diagnosis in individuals with bi-allelic variants inMOGS.Methods: Phenotypic characterisation was performed through an international and multicentre collaboration. Genetic testing was done by exome sequencing and targeted arrays. Biochemical assays on serum and urine were performed to delineate the biochemical signature of MOGS-CDG.Results: Clinical phenotyping revealed heterogeneity in MOGS-CDG, including neurological, immunological and skeletal phenotypes. Bi-allelic variants inMOGSwere identified in 12 individuals from 11 families. The severity in each organ system was variable, without definite genotype correlation. Urine oligosaccharide analysis was consistently abnormal for all affected probands, whereas other biochemical analyses such as serum transferrin analysis was not consistently abnormal.Conclusion: The clinical phenotype of MOGS-CDG includes multisystemic involvement with variable severity. Molecular analysis, combined with biochemical testing, is important for diagnosis. In MOGS-CDG, urine oligosaccharide analysis via matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry can be used as a reliable biochemical test for screening and confirmation of disease.