Uwe Siebert

Prof. Uwe Siebert

UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall/Tyrol, Austria

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 January 2009 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PTPim A.L. Tonino
Pim A.L. Tonino
BBBernard De Bruyne
Bernard De Bruyne
NPNico H.J. Pijls
Nico H.J. Pijls
Uwe SiebertUwe Siebert
Uwe Siebert
FIFumiaki Ikeno
Fumiaki Ikeno
WFWilliam F. Fearon
William F. Fearon
In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary angiography is the standard method for guiding the placement of the stent. It is unclear whether routine measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR; the ratio of maximal blood flow in a stenotic artery to normal maximal flow), in addition to angiography, improves outcomes.

1 July 2010 in JACC
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NPNico H.J. Pijls
Nico H.J. Pijls
WFWilliam F. Fearon
William F. Fearon
PTPim A.L. Tonino
Pim A.L. Tonino
Uwe SiebertUwe Siebert
Uwe Siebert
FIFumiaki Ikeno
Fumiaki Ikeno
BBBernard De Bruyne
Bernard De Bruyne

1 September 2012 in Value in Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJ. Jaime Caro
J. Jaime Caro
ABAndrew H. Briggs
Andrew H. Briggs
Uwe SiebertUwe Siebert
Uwe Siebert
KKKaren M. Kuntz
Karen M. Kuntz

1 September 2008 in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EAElske Ammenwerth
Elske Ammenwerth
PSPetra Schnell-Inderst
Petra Schnell-Inderst
CMC. Machan
C. Machan
Uwe SiebertUwe Siebert
Uwe Siebert
The objective of this systematic review is to analyse the relative risk reduction on medication error and adverse drug events (ADE) by computerized p

1 August 2005 in European Neuropsychopharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSonja von Campenhausen
Sonja von Campenhausen
BBBernhard Bornschein
Bernhard Bornschein
RWRegina Wick
Regina Wick
KBKai Bötzel
Kai Bötzel
CSCristina Sampaio
Cristina Sampaio
RDRichard Dodel
Richard Dodel

18 September 2012 in Medical Decision Making
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJ. Jaime Caro
J. Jaime Caro
ABAndrew H. Briggs
Andrew H. Briggs
Uwe SiebertUwe Siebert
Uwe Siebert
KKKaren M. Kuntz
Karen M. Kuntz
Models—mathematical frameworks that facilitate estimation of the consequences of health care decisions—have become essential tools for health technology assessment. Evolution of the methods since the first ISPOR modeling task force reported in 2003 has led to a new task force, jointly convened with the Society for Medical Decision Making, and this series of seven papers presents the updated recommendations for best practices in conceptualizing models; implementing state–transition approaches, discrete event simulations, or dynamic transmission models; dealing with uncertainty; and validating and reporting models transparently. This overview introduces the work of the task force, provides all the recommendations, and discusses some quandaries that require further elucidation. The audience for these papers includes those who build models, stakeholders who utilize their results, and, indeed, anyone concerned with the use of models to support decision making.