Conventional soil classification methods are expensive and demand extensive field and laboratory work. This research evaluates the efficiency of various machine learning (ML) algorithms in classifying soils based on Robertson’s soil behavioral types. This study employs 4 ML algorithms, including artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and decision trees (DT), to classify soils from 232 cone penetration test (CPT) datasets. The datasets were randomly split into training and testing datasets to train and test the ML models. Metrics such as overall accuracy, sensitivity, precision, F1_score, and confusion matrices provided quantitative evaluations of each model. Our analysis showed that all the ML models accurately classified most soils. The SVM model achieved the highest accuracy of 99.84%, while the ANN model achieved an overall accuracy of 98.82%. The RF and DT models achieved overall accuracy scores of 99.23% and 95.67%, respectively. Additionally, most of the evaluation metrics indicated high scores, demonstrating that the ML models performed well. The SVM and RF models exhibited outstanding performance on both majority and minority soil classes, while the ANN model achieved lower sensitivity and F1_score for minority soil class. Based on these results, we conclude that the SVM and RF algorithms can be integrated into software programs for rapid and accurate soil classification.

Laboratory tests are run on five different cohesionless soils to determine their modulus and damping characteristics. Torsional simple shear and resonant column tests are performed by the same test apparatus in order to compare results. Results indicate that the tests are interchangeable as long as there isn't a significant cycles effect. Number of loading cycles generally increases modulus in sands and decreases modulus in silts. Damping decreases with number of loading cycles for both silts and sands. Threshold strain levels are also studied with agreement between predicted and measured results. Ramberg‐Osgood parameters, taken with uniform cyclic tests, are applied to irregular loading tests along with the Masing criterion. Predictions compare very favorably with test results.

Seismic response assessment requires reliable information about subsurface conditions, including soil shear wave velocity $(V_s)$. To properly assess seismic response, engineers need accurate information about $V_s$, an essential parameter for evaluating the propagation of seismic waves. However, measuring $V_s$ is generally challenging due to the complex and time-consuming nature of field and laboratory tests. This study aims to predict $V_s$ using machine learning (ML) algorithms from cone penetration test (CPT) data. The study utilized four ML algorithms, namely Random Forests (RFs), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Trees (DT), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), to predict $V_s$. These ML models were trained on 70% of the datasets, while their efficiency and generalization ability were assessed on the remaining 30%. The hyperparameters for each ML model were fine-tuned through Bayesian optimization with k-fold cross-validation techniques. The performance of each ML model was evaluated using eight different metrics, including root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), coefficient of determination ($R^2$), performance index ($PI$), scatter index ($SI$), $A10-I$, and $U_{95}$. The results demonstrated that the RF model consistently performed well across all metrics. It achieved high accuracy and the lowest level of errors, indicating superior accuracy and precision in predicting $V_s$. The SVM and XGBoost models also exhibited strong performance, with slightly higher error metrics compared with the RF model. However, the DT model performed poorly, with higher error rates and uncertainty in predicting $V_s$. Based on these results, we can conclude that the RF model is highly effective at accurately predicting $V_s$ using CPT data with minimal input features.

This paper presents a novel application of machine learning models to clarify the intricate behaviors of expansive soils, focusing on the impact of sand content, saturation level, and dry density. Departing from conventional methods, this research utilizes a data-centric approach, employing a suite of sophisticated machine learning models to predict soil properties with remarkable precision. The inclusion of a 30% sand mixture is identified as a critical threshold for optimizing soil strength and stiffness, a finding that underscores the transformative potential of sand amendment in soil engineering. In a significant advancement, the study benchmarks the predictive power of several models including extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), gradient boosting regression (GBR), random forest regression (RFR), decision tree regression (DTR), support vector regression (SVR), symbolic regression (SR), and artificial neural networks (ANNs and proposed ANN-GMDH). Symbolic regression equations have been developed to predict the elasticity modulus and unconfined compressive strength of the investigated expansive soil. Despite the complex behaviors of expansive soil, the trained models allow for optimally predicting the values of unconfined compressive parameters. As a result, this paper provides for the first time a reliable and simply applicable approach for estimating the unconfined compressive parameters of expansive soils. The proposed ANN-GMDH model emerges as the pre-eminent model, demonstrating exceptional accuracy with the best metrics. These results not only highlight the ANN’s superior performance but also mark this study as a groundbreaking endeavor in the application of machine learning to soil behavior prediction, setting a new benchmark in the field.

The artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm is a famous swarm intelligence method utilized across various disciplines due to its robustness. However, it exhibits limitations in exploration mechanisms, particularly in high-dimensional or complex landscapes. This article introduces the adaptive exploration artificial bee colony (AEABC), a novel variant that reinspires the ABC algorithm based on real-world phenomena. AEABC incorporates new distance-based parameters and mechanisms to correct the original design, enhancing its robustness. The performance of AEABC was evaluated against 33 state-of-the-art metaheuristics across twenty-five benchmark functions and an engineering application. AEABC consistently outperformed its counterparts, demonstrating superior efficiency and accuracy. In a variable-sized problem (n = 10), the traditional ABC algorithm converged to 3.086 × 10⁶, while AEABC achieved a convergence of 2.0596 × 10⁻²⁵⁵, highlighting its robust performance. By addressing the shortcomings of the traditional ABC algorithm, AEABC significantly advances mathematical optimization, especially in engineering applications. This work underscores the significance of the inspiration of the traditional ABC algorithm in enhancing the capabilities of swarm intelligence.

Expansive soils pose significant challenges to structural integrity, primarily due to volumetric changes that can lead to detrimental consequences and substantial economic losses. This study delves into the intricate dynamics of expansive soils through loaded swelling pressure experiments conducted under diverse conditions, encompassing variations in the sand content, initial dry unit weight, and initial degree of saturation. The findings underscore the pronounced influence of these factors on soil swelling. To address these challenges, a novel method leveraging machine learning prediction models is introduced, offering an efficient and cost-effective framework to mitigate potential hazards associated with expansive soils. Employing advanced algorithms such as decision tree regression (DTR), random forest regression (RFR), gradient boosting regression (GBR), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), support vector regression (SVR), and artificial neural networks (ANN) in the Python software 3.11 environment, this study aims to predict the optimal applied stress and dry unit weight required for soil swelling mitigation. Results reveal that XGBoost and ANN stand out for their precision and superior metrics. While both performed well, ANN demonstrated exceptional consistency across training and testing phases, making it the preferred choice. In the tested dataset, ANN achieved the highest R-squared values (0.9917 and 0.9954), lowest RMSE (7.92 and 0.086), and lowest MAE (5.872 and 0.0488) for predicting optimal applied stress and dry unit weight, respectively.