Maksim Belitski

Maksim Belitski


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 April 2016 in The Journal of Technology Transfer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DADavid B. Audretsch
David B. Audretsch
MBMaksim Belitski
Maksim Belitski

12 September 2021 in Small Business Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMaksim Belitski
Maksim Belitski
CGChristina Guenther
Christina Guenther
AKAlexander S. Kritikos
Alexander S. Kritikos
RTRoy Thurik
Roy Thurik
The existential threat to small businesses, based on their crucial role in the economy, is behind the plethora of scholarly studies in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Examining the 15 contributions of the special issue on the “Economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on entrepreneurship and small businesses,” the paper comprises four parts: a systematic review of the literature on the effect on entrepreneurship and small businesses; a discussion of four literature strands based on this review; an overview of the contributions in this special issue; and some ideas for post-pandemic economic research.

4 January 2021 in Regional Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DADavid B. Audretsch
David B. Audretsch
MBMaksim Belitski
Maksim Belitski
Who drives regional economic development in entrepreneurial ecosystems of different types? Using longitudinal data on 267 NUTS-3 European regions during the period 2008–16, we apply the entrepreneurial ecosystem theoretical framework to study how entrepreneurial ecosystem type moderates the relationship between a variety of entrepreneurship and regional economic development. It is found that regional economic development proxied by gross value added per resident responds differently to solo self-employment, job creators and new-firm birth rates as well as changes in a share of productive high-growth entrepreneurship across different entrepreneurial ecosystems. The findings have implications for regional and national policy-makers and scholars who study the geography of entrepreneurship.

22 August 2015 in The Annals of Regional Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DADavid B. Audretsch
David B. Audretsch
MBMaksim Belitski
Maksim Belitski
SDSameeksha Desai
Sameeksha Desai

1 April 2019 in Research Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMaksim Belitski
Maksim Belitski
AAAnna Aginskaja
Anna Aginskaja
RMRadzivon Marozau
Radzivon Marozau

8 March 2021 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DADavid Bruce Audretsch
David Bruce Audretsch
MBMaksim Belitski
Maksim Belitski
NCNataliia Cherkas
Nataliia Cherkas
Entrepreneurship activity varies significantly across cities. We use the novel data for 1,652 ecosystem actors across sixteen cities in nine developing and transition economies during 2018–2019 to examine the role that institutional context plays in facilitating the productive entrepreneurship and reducing the unproductive entrepreneurship. This study is the first to develop and test a model of multi-dimensional institutional arrangements in cities. It demonstrates that not just that institutions matter in shaping the entrepreneurship ecosystem in cities, but in particular those institutional arrangements enhancing the productive and reducing unproductive entrepreneurship. Our findings suggest that differences between normative, cognitive, and regulatory pillars are associated with variance in both types of entrepreneurship in cities. For the formation of productive and high-growth entrepreneurs, all three pillars of institutional arrangement matter. For unproductive entrepreneurship normative pillar of institutions and the role of civil society matter most. This study has theoretical and practical implications for entrepreneurship ecosystem policy in cities.