Jean-Marc Naccache

Jean-Marc Naccache

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2018 in Journal of Thoracic Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JNJean-Marc Naccache
Jean-Marc Naccache
QGQuentin Gibiot
Quentin Gibiot
IMIsabelle Monnet
Isabelle Monnet
MAMartine Antoine
Martine Antoine
MWMarie Wislez
Marie Wislez
JCJacques Cadranel
Jacques Cadranel
The association between lung cancer (LC) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) can be explained by the shared risk factors like smoking and physiopathology of fibrogenesis and cancerogenesis. The relative LC risk is shown to be 3.5- to 7.3-times higher in ILD, with LC occurrence estimated at 10–20% in ILD, with >15% of ILD patients likely to die from LC. ILD incidence upon LC diagnosis varied from 2.4–10.9%. Primary radiological presentations consist of peripheral lesions, mostly in the inferior pulmonary lobes, either close to or within the ILD areas. There is a trend towards inverted proportion of adenocarcinomas and squamous-cell carcinomas, with EGFR mutations very rarely found. ILD negatively impacted LC prognosis, with surgery associated with increased morbidity-mortality, particularly due to acute exacerbation (AE) of ILD. Limited resection reduced this risk, whilst increasing that of cancer mortality. Studies on radiotherapy that can induce AE-ILD are scarce. Chemotherapy was associated with similar response rates to those in LC patients without ILD, yet worse survival. This difference may be accounted for by ILD patients’ poorer health and higher risk of drug-induced pneumonitis. Further studies are warranted to better understand cancer physiopathology within the fibrotic areas, along with the therapeutic strategies required.

1 January 2022 in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JNJean-Marc Naccache
Jean-Marc Naccache
SJStéphane Jouneau
Stéphane Jouneau
MDMorgane Didier
Morgane Didier
RBRaphaël Borie
Raphaël Borie
MCMarine Cachanado
Marine Cachanado
HNHilario Nunes
Hilario Nunes

9 October 2019 in European Respiratory Review
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJacques Cadranel
Jacques Cadranel
ACAnthony Canellas
Anthony Canellas
LMLise Matton
Lise Matton
MDMarie Darrason
Marie Darrason
APAntoine Parrot
Antoine Parrot
VFVincent Fallet
Vincent Fallet
Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (ICI-P) during cancer treatment is rarely observed (<5%). ICI-P is more often observed in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than in those with other cancers. Likewise, it is more common in those receiving programmed cell death (PD)-1/PD-1 ligand inhibitors rather than cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen (CTLA)-4 inhibitors alone. The frequency of ICI-P is higher when anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 are administered concomitantly. Despite the low fatality rate (≈13%), ICI-P is the leading cause of ICI-related deaths. This narrative review focuses on the epidemiology, clinical and radiological presentation and prognosis of ICI-P occurring in patients, especially those with advanced NSCLC. Emphasis is placed on the differences in terms of frequency or clinical picture observed depending on whether the ICI is used as monotherapy or in combination with another ICI or chemotherapy. Other pulmonary complications observed in cancer patients, yet not necessarily immune-related, are reviewed, such as sarcoid-like granulomatosis, tuberculosis or other infections. A proposal for pragmatic management, including differential diagnosis and therapeutic strategies, is presented, based on the ICI-P series reported in the literature and published guidelines.

25 April 2018 in Respiratory Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BSBerenice Soyez
Berenice Soyez
RBRaphael borie
Raphael borie
CMCédric Ménard
Cédric Ménard
JCJacques Cadranel
Jacques Cadranel
LCLeonidas Chavez
Leonidas Chavez
BCBruno Crestani
Bruno Crestani
Whole lung lavage is the current standard therapy for pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) that is characterized by the alveolar accumulation of surfactant. Rituximab showed promising results in auto-immune PAP (aPAP) related to anti-GM-CSF antibody. We aimed to assess efficacy of rituximab in aPAP in real life and all patients with aPAP in France that received rituximab were retrospectively analyzed. Thirteen patients were included. No patients showed improvement 6 months after treatment, but, 4 patients (30%) presented a significant decrease of alveolar-arterial difference in oxygen after 1 year. One patient received lung transplantation and one patient was lost of follow-up within one year. Although a spontaneous improvement cannot be excluded in these 4 patients, improvement was more frequent in patients naïve to prior specific therapy and with higher level of anti-GM-CSF antibodies evaluated by ELISA. No serious adverse event was evidenced. These data do not support rituximab as a second line therapy for patients with refractory aPAP.

24 May 2020 in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TNthe OrphaLung network
the OrphaLung network
CDC. Daccord
C. Daccord
Vincent CottinVincent Cottin
Vincent Cottin
GPG. Prévot
G. Prévot
YUY. Uzunhan
Y. Uzunhan
RLR. Lazor
R. Lazor
Background: Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome (BHD) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder caused by mutations in the FLCN gene coding for folliculin. Its clinical expression includes cutaneous fibrofolliculomas, renal tumors, multiple pulmonary cysts, and recurrent spontaneous pneumothoraces. Data on lung function in BHD are scarce and it is not known whether lung function declines over time. We retrospectively assessed lung function at baseline and during follow-up in 96 patients with BHD. Results: Ninety-five percent of BHD patients had multiple pulmonary cysts on computed tomography and 59% had experienced at least one pneumothorax. Mean values of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC ratio, and total lung capacity were normal at baseline. Mean (standard deviation) residual volume (RV) was moderately increased to 116 (36) %pred at baseline, and RV was elevated > 120%pred in 41% of cases. Mean (standard deviation) carbon monoxide transfer factor (DLco) was moderately decreased to 85 (18) %pred at baseline, and DLco was decreased < 80%pred in 33% of cases. When adjusted for age, gender, smoking and history of pleurodesis, lung function parameters did not significantly decline over a follow-up period of 6 years. Conclusions: Cystic lung disease in BHD does not affect respiratory function at baseline except for slightly increased RV and reduced DLco. No significant deterioration of lung function occurs in BHD over a follow-up period of 6 years.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GQgibiot quentin
gibiot quentin
IMIsabelle Monnet
Isabelle Monnet
PLPierre Levy
Pierre Levy
ABAnne-Laure Brun
Anne-Laure Brun
MAMartine Antoine
Martine Antoine
JNJean-Marc Naccache
Jean-Marc Naccache
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) seems to be associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (LC) and to have a poorer prognosis than LC without ILD. The frequency of ILD in an LC cohort and its prognosis implication need to be better elucidated. This retrospective, observational, cohort study evaluated the frequency of ILD among LC patients (LC–ILD) diagnosed over a 2-year period. LC–ILD patients’ characteristics were compared to those with LC without ILD (LC–noILD). Lastly, we conducted a case–control study within this cohort, matching three LC–noILDs to each LC–ILD patient, to evaluate the ILD impact on LC patients’ prognoses. Among 906 LC patients, 49 (5.4%) also had ILD. Comparing LC–ILD to LC–noILD patients, respectively, more were men (85.7% vs. 66.2%; p = 0.02); adenocarcinomas were less frequent (47.1% vs. 58.7%, p = 0.08); median [range] and overall survival was shorter: (9 [range: 0.1–39.4] vs. 17.5 [range: 0.8–50.4] months; p = 0.01). Multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) retained two factors independently associated with LC risk of death: ILD (1.79 [1.22–2.62]; p = 0.003) and standard-of-care management (0.49 [0.33–0.72]; p < 0.001). Approximately 5% of patients with a new LC diagnosis had associated ILD. ILD was a major prognosis factor for LC and should be taken into consideration for LC management. Further studies are needed to determine the best therapeutic strategy for the LC–ILD population.