Giovanni Genovese

Dr. Giovanni Genovese

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 July 2021 in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ESE. Schmidt
E. Schmidt
HRH. Rashid
H. Rashid
Angelo MarzanoAngelo Marzano
Angelo Marzano
ALA. Lamberts
A. Lamberts
GZG. Di Zenzo
G. Di Zenzo
FCF. Caux
F. Caux
This guideline has been initiated by the task forceAutoimmune Blistering Diseasesof the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, including physicians from all relevant disciplines and patient organizations. It is a S3 consensus‐based guideline that systematically reviewed the literature on mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases until June 2019, with no limitations on language. While the first part of this guideline addressed methodology, as well as epidemiology, terminology, aetiology, clinical presentation and outcome measures in MMP, the second part presents the diagnostics and management of MMP. MMP should be suspected in cases with predominant mucosal lesions. Direct immunofluorescence microscopy to detect tissue‐bound IgG, IgA and/or complement C3, combined with serological testing for circulating autoantibodies are recommended. In most patients, serum autoantibodies are present only in low levels and in variable proportions, depending on the clinical sites involved. Circulating autoantibodies are determined by indirect IF assays using tissue substrates, or ELISA using different recombinant forms of the target antigens or immunoblotting using different substrates. The major target antigen in MMP is type XVII collagen (BP180), although in 10–25% of patients laminin 332 is recognized. In 25–30% of MMP patients with anti‐laminin 332 reactivity, malignancies have been associated. As first‐line treatment of mild/moderate MMP, dapsone, methotrexate or tetracyclines and/or topical corticosteroids are recommended. For severe MMP, dapsone and oral or intravenous cyclophosphamide and/or oral corticosteroids are recommended as first‐line regimens. Additional recommendations are given, tailored to treatment of single‐site MMP such as oral, ocular, laryngeal, oesophageal and genital MMP, as well as the diagnosis of ocular MMP. Treatment recommendations are limited by the complete lack of high‐quality randomized controlled trials.

5 July 2020 in British Journal of Dermatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Angelo MarzanoAngelo Marzano
Angelo Marzano
NCN. Cassano
N. Cassano
GGGiovanni Genovese
Giovanni Genovese
Chiara MoltrasioChiara Moltrasio
Chiara Moltrasio
GVG.A. Vena
G.A. Vena
SummaryBackground. The infection caused by the recently identified SARS‐CoV‐2, called coronavirus disease‐19 (COVID‐19), has rapidly spread throughout the world

2 March 2020 in British Journal of Dermatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Angelo MarzanoAngelo Marzano
Angelo Marzano
GGGiovanni Genovese
Giovanni Genovese
GCGiovanni Casazza
Giovanni Casazza
Chiara MoltrasioChiara Moltrasio
Chiara Moltrasio
PDP. Dapavo
P. Dapavo
KPK. Peris
K. Peris

10 July 2021 in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HRH. Rashid
H. Rashid
ALA. Lamberts
A. Lamberts
LBL. Borradori
L. Borradori
SAS. Alberti‐Violetti
S. Alberti‐Violetti
RBR.J. Barry
R.J. Barry
BHB. Horváth
B. Horváth
This guideline on mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) has been elaborated by the Task Force for Autoimmune Blistering Diseases of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) with a contribution of physicians from all relevant disciplines and patient organizations. It is a S3 consensus‐based guideline encompassing a systematic review of the literature until June 2019 in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. This first part covers methodology, the clinical definition of MMP, epidemiology, MMP subtypes, immunopathological characteristics, disease assessment and outcome scores. MMP describes a group of autoimmune skin and mucous membrane blistering diseases, characterized by a chronic course and by predominant involvement of the mucous membranes, such as the oral, ocular, nasal, nasopharyngeal, anogenital, laryngeal and oesophageal mucosa. MMP patients may present with mono‐ or multisite involvement. Patients’ autoantibodies have been shown to be predominantly directed against BP180 (also called BPAG2, type XVII collagen), BP230, laminin 332 and type VII collagen, components of junctional adhesion complexes promoting epithelial stromal attachment in stratified epithelia. Various disease assessment scores are available, including the Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (MMPDAI), the Autoimmune Bullous Skin disorder Intensity Score (ABSIS), the ‘Cicatrising Conjunctivitis Assessment Tool’ and the Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS). Patient‐reported outcome measurements (PROMs), including DLQI, ABQOL and TABQOL, can be used for assessment of quality of life to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions and monitor disease course.

19 January 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EAElisabetta Antonelli
Elisabetta Antonelli
GBGabrio Bassotti
Gabrio Bassotti
MTMarta Tramontana
Marta Tramontana
KHKatharina Hansel
Katharina Hansel
LSLuca Stingeni
Luca Stingeni
GMGiovanni Maconi
Giovanni Maconi
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) may be associated with extra-intestinal manifestations. Among these, mucocutaneous manifestations are relatively frequent, often difficult to diagnose and treat, and may complicate the course of the underlying disease. In the present review, a summary of the most relevant literature on the dermatologic manifestations occurring in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases has been reviewed. The following dermatological manifestations associated with IBDs have been identified: (i) specific manifestations with the same histological features of the underlying IBD (occurring only in Crohn’s disease); (ii) cutaneous disorders associated with IBDs (such as aphthous stomatitis, erythema nodosum, psoriasis, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita); (iii) reactive mucocutaneous manifestations of IBDs (such as pyoderma gangrenosum, Sweet’s syndrome, bowel-associated dermatosis-arthritis syndrome, aseptic abscess ulcers, pyodermatitis–pyostomatitis vegetans, etc.); (iv) mucocutaneous conditions secondary to treatment (including injection site reactions, infusion reactions, paradoxical reactions, eczematous and psoriasis-like reactions, cutaneous infections, and cutaneous malignancies); (v) manifestations due to nutritional malabsorption (such as stomatitis, glossitis, angular cheilitis, pellagra, scurvy, purpura, acrodermatitis enteropathica, phrynoderma, seborrheic-type dermatitis, hair and nail abnormalities). An accurate dermatological examination is essential in all IBD patients, especially in candidates to biologic therapies, in whom drug-induced cutaneous reactions may assume marked clinical relevance.

19 November 2018 in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Angelo MarzanoAngelo Marzano
Angelo Marzano
GGGiovanni Genovese
Giovanni Genovese
GCGiovanni Casazza
Giovanni Casazza
MFM. T. Fierro
M. T. Fierro
PDP. Dapavo
P. Dapavo
RAR. Asero
R. Asero