Inertial measurement units (IMUs) have a long-lasting popularity in a variety of industrial applications from navigation systems to guidance and robotics. Their use in clinical practice is now becoming more common, thanks to miniaturization and the ability to integrate on-board computational and decision-support features. IMU-based gait analysis is a paradigm of this evolving process, and in this study its use for the assessment of Parkinson's disease (PD) is comprehensively analyzed. Data coming from 25 individuals with different levels of PD symptoms severity and an equal number of age-matched healthy individuals were included into a set of 6 different machine learning (ML) techniques, processing 18 different configurations of gait parameters taken from 8 IMU sensors. Classification accuracy was calculated for each configuration and ML technique, adding two meta-classifiers based on the results obtained from all individual techniques through majority of voting, with two different weighting schemes. Average classification accuracy ranged between 63% and 80% among classifiers and increased up to 96% for one meta-classifier configuration. Configurations based on a statistical preselection process showed the highest average classification accuracy. When reducing the number of sensors, features based on the joint range of motion were more accurate than those based on spatio-temporal parameters. In particular, best results were obtained with the knee range of motion, calculated with four IMUs, placed bilaterally. The obtained findings provide data-driven evidence on which combination of sensor configurations and classification methods to be used during IMU-based gait analysis to grade the severity level of PD.

Accuracy of systems able to recognize in real time daily living activities heavily depends on the processing step for signal segmentation. So far, windowing approaches are used to segment data and the window size is usually chosen based on previous studies. However, literature is vague on the investigation of its effect on the obtained activity recognition accuracy, if both short and long duration activities are considered. In this work, we present the impact of window size on the recognition of daily living activities, where transitions between different activities are also taken into account. The study was conducted on nine participants who wore a tri-axial accelerometer on their waist and performed some short (sitting, standing, and transitions between activities) and long (walking, stair descending and stair ascending) duration activities. Five different classifiers were tested, and among the different window sizes, it was found that 1.5 s window size represents the best trade-off in recognition among activities, with an obtained accuracy well above 90%. Differences in recognition accuracy for each activity highlight the utility of developing adaptive segmentation criteria, based on the duration of the activities.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of posturographic parameters (PP) to changes in acquisition settings. A group of eight young adults underwent a set of typical orthostatic posture trials, and selected PP were then calculated from a set of centre of pressure (CoP) displacement time series obtained by applying different cut-off frequencies to the same set of raw data. Four PP out of 11 showed significant changes with respect to cut-off frequency. Statistical mechanics parameters exhibited smaller sensitivity than summary measures. On the basis of the results obtained, a proposal for a standard cut-off frequency and a sampling rate value is embodied in the paper together with some suggestions on measurement settings, with a view to standardized use of instrumentation for quantitative analysis in orthostatic posturography.