Roderick Skinner

Dr. Roderick Skinner


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2017 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRoderick Skinner
Roderick Skinner
RMRenee L Mulder
Renee L Mulder
LKLeontien C Kremer
Leontien C Kremer
MHMelissa M Hudson
Melissa M Hudson
LCLouis S Constine
Louis S Constine
DGDaniel M Green
Daniel M Green

1 June 2006 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRoderick Skinner
Roderick Skinner
WWW Hamish B Wallace
W Hamish B Wallace
GLGill A Levitt
Gill A Levitt

11 July 2003 in Medical and Pediatric Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RSRoderick Skinner
Roderick Skinner

29 September 2020 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMRenée L. Mulder
Renée L. Mulder
MHMelissa Maria Hudson
Melissa Maria Hudson
SBSmita Bhatia
Smita Bhatia
WLWendy Landier
Wendy Landier
GLGill Levitt
Gill Levitt
KOKevin C. Oeffinger
Kevin C. Oeffinger
PURPOSE: As new evidence is available, the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group has updated breast cancer surveillance recommendations for female survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer. METHODS: We used evidence-based methods to apply new knowledge in refining the international harmonized recommendations developed in 2013. The guideline panel updated the systematic literature review, developed evidence summaries, appraised the evidence, and updated recommendations on the basis of evidence, clinical judgement, and consideration of benefits versus the harms of the surveillance interventions while attaining flexibility in implementation across different health care systems. The GRADE Evidence-to-Decision framework was used to translate evidence to recommendations. A survivor information form was developed to counsel survivors about the potential harms and benefits of surveillance. RESULTS: The literature update identified new study findings related to the effects of prescribed moderate-dose chest radiation (10 to 19 Gy), radiation dose-volume, anthracyclines and alkylating agents in non–chest irradiated survivors, and the effects of ovarian function on breast cancer risk. Moreover, new data from prospective investigations were available regarding the performance metrics of mammography and magnetic resonance imaging among survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma. Modified recommendations include the performance of mammography and breast magnetic resonance imaging for survivors treated with 10 Gy or greater chest radiation (strong recommendation) and upper abdominal radiation exposing breast tissue at a young age (moderate recommendation) at least annually up to age 60 years. As a result of inconsistent evidence, no recommendation could be formulated for routine breast cancer surveillance for survivors treated with any type of anthracyclines in the absence of chest radiation. CONCLUSION: The newly identified evidence prompted significant change to the recommendations formulated in 2013 related to moderate-dose chest radiation and anthracycline exposure as well as breast cancer surveillance modality.

1 December 2009 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRoderick Skinner
Roderick Skinner
APAnnie Parry
Annie Parry
LPLisa Price
Lisa Price
MCMichael Cole
Michael Cole
ACAlan W. Craft
Alan W. Craft
APAndrew D.J. Pearson
Andrew D.J. Pearson

1 September 2021 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RKRebecca J. van Kalsbeek
Rebecca J. van Kalsbeek
HPHelena J.H. van der Pal
Helena J.H. van der Pal
LKLeontien C.M. Kremer
Leontien C.M. Kremer
EBEdit Bardi
Edit Bardi
MBMorven C. Brown
Morven C. Brown
RMRenée L. Mulder
Renée L. Mulder
Long-term follow-up (LTFU) care for childhood, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) cancer survivors is essential to preserve health and quality of life (QoL). Evidence-based guidelines are needed to inform optimal surveillance strategies, but many topics are yet to be addressed by the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group (IGHG). Therefore, the PanCareFollowUp Recommendations Working Group collaborated with stakeholders to develop European harmonised recommendations in anticipation of evidence-based IGHG guidelines. The PanCareFollowUp Recommendations Working Group, consisting of 23 late effects specialists, researchers, and survivor representatives from nine countries, collaborated in the first Europe-wide effort to provide unified recommendations in anticipation of evidence-based guidelines. A pragmatic methodology was used to define recommendations for topics where no evidence-based IGHG recommendations exist. The objective was to describe the surveillance requirements for high-quality care while balancing the different infrastructures and resources across European health care systems. The process included two face-to-face meetings and an external consultation round involving 18 experts from 14 countries. Twenty-five harmonised recommendations for LTFU care were developed collaboratively and address topics requiring awareness only (n = 6), awareness, history and/or physical examination (n = 9), or additional surveillance tests (n = 10). The PanCareFollowUp Recommendations, representing a unique agreement across European stakeholders, emphasise awareness among survivors and health care providers in addition to tailored clinical evaluation and/or surveillance tests. They include existing IGHG guidelines and additional recommendations developed by a pragmatic methodology and will be used in the Horizon 2020-funded PanCareFollowUp project to improve health and QoL of CAYA cancer survivors.