Purpose of review Ocular involvement in sarcoidosis is present in up to 80% of patients and is frequently manifested before diagnosis of the underlying systemic disease. Considering the therapeutic consequences, early diagnosis of the underlying disease is advantageous in patients presenting with ocular inflammation. There are several ocular findings suggestive of underlying sarcoidosis, such as granulomatous keratic precipitates, iris nodules, cells in the vitreous humor known as snowballs and snowbanks, and retinal periphlebitis. High suspicion is crucial for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. This review on ocular sarcoidosis will mainly focus on new diagnostic and treatment modalities. Recent findings Recent studies found possible new diagnostic indicators for the diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis which include not only serum profiles but also vitreous sample analysis. Ophthalmologic imaging techniques have improved to investigate the ocular structure in detail. Results from recent uveitis clinical trials have included sarcoidosis as an underlying cause and have reported positive results. Summary The diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis can be challenging in some cases. High suspicion is important to diagnose ocular sarcoidosis with various laboratory and ophthalmic tools. There are many possible options for the treatment of ocular sarcoidosis including various biologic agents.

Objective To evaluate prognostic factors associated with good response to intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) treatment in central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) patients. Methods We retrospectively reviewed ninety-four eyes of 94 CSC patients who received intravitreal bevacizumab injection(IVB) (0.05 ml, 1.25 mg) as a first line treatment. Patients were divided into two groups as good responders and poor responders based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings 1 month after the first injection of intravitreal bevacizumab. Good responders were defined as complete resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) on OCT 1 month after IVB. We compared baseline visual acuity, duration of symptoms, angiographic findings on fluorescein angiography, central retinal thickness (CRT), macular volume (MV),subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) between two groups. Results 42 eyes were included as good responder and 52 eyes as poor responders. Mean age was 47.8±7.4 year old ingood responders and 50.6±7.8 year old in poor responders. Baseline visual acuity (logMAR) was better in good responders than poor responders, 0.19±0.19 and 0.29±0.19 respectively (p=0.015). SFCT was significantly thicker in good responders than poor responders 419.7±103.2㎛ and 376.0±99.0㎛ respectively (p=0.040). Prevalence of chronic cases was higher in poor responders (33/52) than good responders (15/42), (p=0.012). There was no statistical significance in age, sex, CRT, MVbetween two groups. Conclusion Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab can be potential option for the treatment of CSC patients, especially in case of recent onset, better baseline visual acuity with thicker choroid on OCT.

1. Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of irreversible blindness worldwide and is characterised by the progressive degeneration of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) (Lee and Mackey 2022; Qi et al. 20...