To analyze hospitalization for lower extremity amputations (LEAs) and amputee rates in persons with and without diabetes in Italy. All patients with LEAs in the period 2001–2010 were identified analyzing the National Hospital Discharge Record database. For each year, amputee and hospitalization rates for LEAs were calculated either for persons with diabetes or without. Time trend for major and minor amputations were analysed. From 2001 to 2010 a mean annual number of 11,639 individuals underwent a lower extremity amputation: 58.6% had diabetes accounting for 60.7% of total hospitalizations. In 2010, the crude amputee rate for LEAs was 20.4 per 100,000 inhabitants: 247.2 for 100.000 persons with diabetes, and 8.6 for those without diabetes. Having diabetes was associated to an increased risk of amputation (Poisson estimated RR 10.9, 95%CI 9.4–12.8). Over the whole period, a progressive reduction of amputee rates was observed for major amputations either among persons with diabetes (−30.7%) or without diabetes (−12.5%), while the rates of minor amputations increased progressively (+22.4%) among people without diabetes and were nearly stable in people with diabetes (−4.6%). A greater number of minor amputations were performed among persons with than without diabetes: in 2010, the minor-to-major ratio among persons with diabetes (2.5) was more than twice than in those without diabetes (1.0). The nationwide analyses confirm a progressive reduction of hospitalization and amputee rates for major LEAs, suggesting an earlier and more diffuse approach aimed at limb salvage.

Background: Telemedicine systems based on mobile phones represent new promising educational tools. The “Diabetes Interactive Diary” (DID) is a carbohydrate/bolus calculator promoting the patient–physician communication via short message service. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the DID versus usual care on metabolic control, hypoglycemia, and quality of life. Patients and Methods: Patients with type 1 diabetes on a basal:bolus regimen with insulin glargine and insulin glulisine, not previously educated on carbohydrate (CHO) counting, were randomized to DID (Group A; n=63) or traditional education (Group B; n=64). Generalized hierarchical linear regression models for repeated measures were applied to compare changes between groups. Incidence of hypoglycemia was compared using Poisson regression models. Results: Of 127 patients (age, 36.9±10.5 years; diabetes duration, 16.3±9.3 years), 15 (11.8%) dropped out. After 6 months, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels decreased by −0.49±0.11 in Group A and −0.48±0.11 in Group B (P=0.73). Group A showed a 86% lower risk of grade 2 hypoglycemia than Group B. Compared with usual care, DID improved the “perceived frequency of hyperglycemic episodes” scale of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire and the “social relations” and the “fear of hypoglycemia” dimensions of the Diabetes Specific Quality of Life Scale. Results obtained with DID markedly differ among patients and centers. Conclusions: DID is no more effective than traditional CHO counting education in reducing HbA1c levels. DID reduces the risk of moderate/severe hypoglycemia and improves quality of life. A better understanding of patients' and healthcare professionals' attitudes associated with an effective care supported by technology is essential to avoid waste of resources.

Diabetic foot (DF) is a chronic and highly disabling complication of diabetes. The prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is high in diabetic patients and, associated or not with peripheral neuropathy (PN), can be found in 50% of cases of DF. It is worth pointing out that the number of major amputations in diabetic patients is still very high. Many PAD diabetic patients are not revascularised due to lack of technical expertise or, even worse, negative beliefs because of poor experience. This despite the progress obtained in the techniques of distal revascularisation that nowadays allow to reopen distal arteries of the leg and foot. Italy has one of the lowest prevalence rates of major amputations in Europe, and has a long tradition in the field of limb salvage by means of an aggressive approach in debridement, antibiotic therapy and distal revascularisation. Therefore, we believe it is appropriate to produce a consensus document concerning the treatment of PAD and limb salvage in diabetic patients, based on the Italian experience in this field, to share with the scientific community.

While in non-diabetic people the risk for cardiovascular disease is higher in men, diabetes completely reverts this sex-gender difference conferring to women a greater burden of cardiovascular complications. Additionally, all risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease appear to be more active in diabetic females than in their male counterparts. The reasons of this different impact of diabetes between genders are not completely clear. The aim of this review is trying to clarify these issues in a sex and gender perspective. Both genetic and hormonal factors are at the basis of sex-gender differences in diabetes, even do not explain the totality of data. Possibly women arrive later and in worse conditions to the diagnosis of diabetes, receive both diagnostic and therapeutic supports in a lesser measure and, finally, reach therapeutic goals as recommended by guidelines in a lesser extent. Further aspects of sex-gender differences in diabetic complications are represented by a more frequent prevalence of drug side effects in women, as well as by increased resistance to the action of drugs used in prevention or in the therapy of cardiovascular diseases. As to microvascular complications, the issue of sex-gender differences is even more complex, with some important differences emerging in experimental models ‘in vitro’, as well as in human pathology ‘in vivo’. The main problem, however, also in this case, is that it is difficult to differentiate how common pathogenetic mechanisms acting in diabetes may differently impact between genders. In conclusion what is evident is that diabetes represents a ‘risk magnifier’ for the damage of both micro and macrovessels differently in men and in women. This issue deserves, therefore, a more careful approach from people involved in both clinical aspects and research regarding diabetes and its complications, in a sex-gender oriented perspective.