A working group initiated within the French Cytometry Association (AFC) was developed in order to harmonize the application of multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) for myeloid disease diagnosis in France. The protocol presented here was agreed-upon and applied between September 2013 and November 2015 in six French diagnostic laboratories (University Hospitals of Saint-Etienne, Grenoble, Clermont-Ferrand, Nice, and Lille and Institut Paoli-Calmettes in Marseille) and allowed the standardization of bone marrow sample preparation and data acquisition. Three maturation databases were developed for neutrophil, monocytic, and erythroid lineages with bone marrow from "healthy" donor individuals (individuals without any evidence of a hematopoietic disease). A robust method of analysis for each myeloid lineage should be applicable for routine diagnostic use. New cases can be analyzed in the same manner and compared against the usual databases. Thus, quantitative and qualitative phenotypic abnormalities can be identified and those above 2SD compared with data of normal bone marrow samples should be considered indicative of pathology. The major limitation is the higher variability between the data achieved using the monoclonal antibodies obtained with the methods based on hybridoma technologies and currently used in clinical diagnosis. Setting criteria for technical validation of the data acquired may help improve the utility of MFC for MDS diagnostics. The establishment of these criteria requires analysis against a database. The reduction of investigator subjectivity in data analysis is an important advantage of this method.

Background: Embryonic antigens (EA) regulate pluripotency, self-renewal, and differentiation in embryonic stem (ES) cells during their development. In adult somatic cells, EA expression is normally inhibited; however, EAs can be re-expressed by cancer cells and are involved in the deregulation of different signaling pathways (SPs). In the context of AML, data concerning the expression of EAs are scarce and contradictory. Methods: We used mass cytometry to explore the expression of EAs and three SPs in myeloid cells from AML patients and normal bone marrow (NBM). Imaging flow cytometry was used for morphological assessment of cells in association with their OCT3/4 expression status (positive vs. negative). Results: An overall reduction in or absence of EA expression was observed in immature myeloid cells from AML patients compared to their normal counterparts. Stage-specific embryonic antigen-3 (SSEA-3) was consistently expressed at low levels in immature myeloid cells, whereas SSEA-1 was overexpressed in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and myeloblasts from AML with monocytic differentiation (AML M4/M5). Therefore, these markers are valuable for distinguishing between normal and abnormal myeloid cells. These preliminary results show that the exploration of myeloid cell intracellular SPs in the setting of AML is very informative. Deregulation of three important leukemogenic SPs was also observed in myeloid cells from AML. Conclusions: Exploring EAs and SPs in myeloid cells from AML patients by mass cytometry may help identify characteristic phenotypes and facilitate AML follow-up.