Edvardas Danila

Prof. Edvardas Danila

1. Clinic of Chest Diseases, Immunology and Allergology of Faculty of Medicine of Vilnius University, Santariskiu g. 2, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2019 in International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
OAOnno W. Akkerman
Onno W. Akkerman
AAAlena Aleksa
Alena Aleksa
JAJan-Willem C Alffenaar
Jan-Willem C Alffenaar
NANada Hassan Al-Marzouqi
Nada Hassan Al-Marzouqi
MAMiguel Arias-Guillén
Miguel Arias-Guillén
MZMatteo Zignol
Matteo Zignol
The World Health Organization launched a global initiative, known as aDSM (active TB drug safety monitoring and management) to better describe the safety profile of new treatment regimens for drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) in real-world settings. However, comprehensive surveillance is difficult to implement in several countries. The aim of the aDSM project is to demonstrate the feasibility of implementing national aDSM registers and to describe the type and the frequency of adverse events (AEs) associated with exposure to the new anti-TB drugs. Following a pilot study carried out in 2016, official involvement of TB reference centres/countries into the project was sought and cases treated with bedaquiline- and/or delamanid-containing regimens were consecutively recruited. AEs were prospectively collected ensuring potential attribution of the AE to a specific drug based on its known safety profile. A total of 309 cases were fully reported from 41 centres in 27 countries (65% males; 268 treated with bedaquiline, 20 with delamanid, and 21 with both drugs) out of an estimated 781 cases the participating countries had committed to report by the first quarter of 2019.

7 March 2023 in International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JNJoanitah Nalunjogi
Joanitah Nalunjogi
SMSergio Mucching-Toscano
Sergio Mucching-Toscano
JSJean Pierre Sibomana
Jean Pierre Sibomana
RCRosella Centis
Rosella Centis
LDLia D'AMbrosio
Lia D'AMbrosio
GMGiovanni Battista Migliori
Giovanni Battista Migliori
Although evidence is growing on the overall impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tuberculosis (TB) services, global studies based on national data are needed to better quantify the extent of the impact and the countries' preparedness to tackle the two diseases. The aim of this study was to compare the number of people with new diagnoses or recurrence of TB disease, the number of drug-resistant (DR)-TB, and the number of TB deaths in 2020 vs 2019 in 11 countries in Europe, Northern America, and Australia. TB managers or directors of national reference centers of the selected countries provided the agreed-upon variables through a validated questionnaire on a monthly basis. A descriptive analysis compared the incidence of TB and DR-TB and mortality of the pre-COVID-19 year (2019) vs the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020). Comparing 2020 vs 2019, lower number of TB cases (new diagnosis or recurrence) was notified in all countries (except USA-Virginia and Australia), and fewer DR-TB notifications (apart from France, Portugal, and Spain). The deaths among TB cases were higher in 2020 compared to 2019 in most countries with three countries (France, The Netherlands, USA-Virginia) reporting minimal TB-related mortality. A comprehensive evaluation of medium-term impact of COVID-19 on TB services would benefit from similar studies in multiple settings and from global availability of treatment outcome data from TB/COVID-19 co-infected patients.

17 May 2025 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RMRūta Mereškevičienė
Rūta Mereškevičienė
EDEdvardas Danila
Edvardas Danila
Tuberculosis remains a significant public health challenge globally. The emergence of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains presents one of the biggest hurdles in tuberculosis management. Both first- and second-line tuberculosis drugs are associated with common adverse reactions, which can lead to treatment interruptions and decreased adherence. In this article, we review the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of tuberculosis, focusing on the adverse reactions they may cause. We will examine the frequency and timeline of adverse drug reactions involving gastrointestinal, cardiac, neurological, nephrological, and cutaneous systems. Identifying patients at risk of developing those reactions is crucial for healthcare providers to implement monitoring strategies and manage complications effectively. In the review, we present the data about risk factors, management recommendations, and drug discontinuation rates as a result of side effects.

30 April 2022 in Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GMGiovanni Battista Migliori
Giovanni Battista Migliori
PTPei Min Thong2
Pei Min Thong2
JAJan-Willem C Alffenaar
Jan-Willem C Alffenaar
Justin DenholmJustin Denholm
Justin Denholm
Marina TadoliniMarina Tadolini
Marina Tadolini
DSDenise Rossato Silva36
Denise Rossato Silva36
The objective of this study was to describe country-specific lockdown measures and tuberculosis indicators collected during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Data on lockdown/social restrictions (compulsory face masks and hand hygiene; international and local travel restrictions; restrictions to family visits, and school closures) were collected from 24 countries spanning five continents. The majority of the countries implemented multiple lockdowns with partial or full reopening. There was an overall decrease in active tuberculosis, drug-resistant tuberculosis, and latent tuberculosis cases. Although national lockdowns were effective in containing COVID-19 cases, several indicators of tuberculosis were affected during the pandemic.

EJElena Jureviciene
Elena Jureviciene
GBGreta Burneikaitė
Greta Burneikaitė
LDLaimis Dambrauskas
Laimis Dambrauskas
VKVytautas Kasiulevicius
Vytautas Kasiulevicius
EKEdita Kazėnaitė
Edita Kazėnaitė
EDEdvardas Danila
Edvardas Danila
Various comorbidities and multimorbidity frequently occur in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), leading to the overload of health care systems and increased mortality. We aimed to assess the impact of COPD on the probability and clustering of comorbidities. The cross-sectional analysis of the nationwide Lithuanian database was performed based on the entries of the codes of chronic diseases. COPD was defined on the code J44.8 entry and six-month consumption of bronchodilators. Descriptive statistics and odds ratios (ORs) for associations and agglomerative hierarchical clustering were carried out. 321,297 patients aged 40–79 years were included; 4834 of them had COPD. A significantly higher prevalence of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), lung cancer, kidney diseases, and the association of COPD with six-fold higher odds of lung cancer (OR 6.66; p < 0.0001), a two-fold of heart failure (OR 2.61; p < 0.0001), and CVD (OR 1.83; p < 0.0001) was found. Six clusters in COPD males and five in females were pointed out, in patients without COPD—five and four clusters accordingly. The most prevalent cardiovascular cluster had no significant difference according to sex or COPD presence, but a different linkage of dyslipidemia was found. The study raises the need to elaborate adjusted multimorbidity case management and screening tools enabling better outcomes.

EDEdvardas Danila
Edvardas Danila
DLDonata Linkeviciute-Ulinskiene
Donata Linkeviciute-Ulinskiene
RZRolandas Zablockis
Rolandas Zablockis
VGVygantas Gruslys
Vygantas Gruslys
SCSaulius Cicènas
Saulius Cicènas
GSGiedre Smailyte
Giedre Smailyte
We evaluated the effect of antihyperglycemic therapy on the survival of patients with lung cancer (LC). The analysis included patients with LC and concomitant type 2 diabetes. 15,929 patients were classified into five groups: metformin users, insulin users, metformin and insulin users, sulphonylurea users and non-diabetic group. A multivariate analysis showed that exposure to either metformin or to insulin was associated with a lower risk of LC-specific mortality, and this approached statistical significance (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72–92 for metformin and HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44–95 for insulin). When deaths from all causes were considered, only metformin exposure was associated with a significantly lower risk of death (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73–0.92). Users of sulphonylurea were at a higher risk of LC-specific and overall mortality (HRs 1.19, 95% CI 0.99–1.43 and 1.22, 95% CI 1.03–1.45). Our study shows a positive effect of metformin on the survival of patients with LC. Moreover, our results show that exposure to insulin was associated with a lower risk of LC-specific mortality, but not with deaths from all causes. The study results suggested that users of sulphonylurea may be at a higher risk of LC-specific and overall mortality.