Kee Hyung Park

Kee Hyung Park

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2014 in Journal of Clinical Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HSHye-Young Shin
Hye-Young Shin
HHHyun Jung Han
Hyun Jung Han
DSDong-Jin Shin
Dong-Jin Shin
HPHyeon-Mi Park
Hyeon-Mi Park
YLYeong-Bae Lee
Yeong-Bae Lee
KPKee Hyung Park
Kee Hyung Park
Shin HY, et al. J Clin Neurol. 2014 Jul;10(3):203-209. https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2014.10.3.203

21 November 2019 in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMin Ju Kang
Min Ju Kang
SKSangYun Kim
SangYun Kim
DNDuk L. Na
Duk L. Na
BKByeong C. Kim
Byeong C. Kim
DYDong Won Yang
Dong Won Yang
YYYoung Chul Youn
Young Chul Youn
Background: Neuropsychological tests (NPTs) are important tools for informing diagnoses of cognitive impairment (CI). However, interpreting NPTs requires specialists and is thus time-consuming. To streamline the application of NPTs in clinical settings, we developed and evaluated the accuracy of a machine learning algorithm using multi-center NPT data. Methods: Multi-center data were obtained from 14,926 formal neuropsychological assessments (Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery), which were classified into normal cognition (NC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease dementia (ADD). We trained a machine learning model with artificial neural network algorithm using TensorFlow (https://www.tensorflow.org) to distinguish cognitive state with the 46-variable data and measured prediction accuracies from 10 randomly selected datasets. The features of the NPT were listed in order of their contribution to the outcome using Recursive Feature Elimination. Results: The ten times mean accuracies of identifying CI (MCI and ADD) achieved by 96.66 ± 0.52% of the balanced dataset and 97.23 ± 0.32% of the clinic-based dataset, and the accuracies for predicting cognitive states (NC, MCI or ADD) were 95.49 ± 0.53 and 96.34 ± 1.03%. The sensitivity to the detection CI and MCI in the balanced dataset were 96.0 and 96.0%, and the specificity were 96.8 and 97.4%, respectively. The ‘time orientation’ and ‘3-word recall’ score of MMSE were highly ranked features in predicting CI and cognitive state. The twelve features reduced from 46 variable of NPTs with age and education had contributed to more than 90% accuracy in predicting cognitive impairment. Conclusions: The machine learning algorithm for NPTs has suggested potential use as a reference in differentiating cognitive impairment in the clinical setting.

1 January 2024 in Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KPKee Hyung Park
Kee Hyung Park
GKGeon Ha Kim
Geon Ha Kim
CKChi-Hun Kim
Chi-Hun Kim
Seong-Ho KohSeong-Ho Koh
Seong-Ho Koh
SMSo Young Moon
So Young Moon
SCSeong Hye Choi
Seong Hye Choi
Park KH, et al. Dement Neurocogn Disord. 2024 Oct;23(4):165-187. https://doi.org/10.12779/dnd.2024.23.4.165

1 January 2018 in Journal of Clinical Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ECEun-Jung Choi
Eun-Jung Choi
YSYoung-Don Son
Young-Don Son
YNYoung Noh
Young Noh
HLHyon Lee
Hyon Lee
YKYoung-Bo Kim
Young-Bo Kim
KPKee Hyung Park
Kee Hyung Park
Choi EJ, et al. J Clin Neurol. 2018 Apr;14(2):158-164. https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2018.14.2.158

1 January 2024 in Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SNSeunghee Na
Seunghee Na
DONG WOO KANGDONG WOO KANG
DONG WOO KANG
GKGeon Ha Kim
Geon Ha Kim
KKKo Woon Kim
Ko Woon Kim
YKYeshin Kim
Yeshin Kim
OAon behalf of Korean Dementia Association
on behalf of Korean Dementia Association
Dementia subtypes, including Alzheimer’s dementia (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), pose diagnostic challenges. This review examines the effectiveness of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG PET) in differentiating these subtypes for precise treatment and management. A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted using databases like PubMed and Embase to identify studies on the diagnostic utility of 18F-FDG PET in dementia. The search included studies up to November 16, 2022, focusing on peer-reviewed journals and applying the gold-standard clinical diagnosis for dementia subtypes. From 12,815 articles, 14 were selected for final analysis. For AD versus FTD, the sensitivity was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88–0.98) and specificity was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70–0.92). In the case of AD versus DLB, 18F-FDG PET showed a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98) and specificity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.70–0.92). Lastly, when differentiating AD from non-AD dementias, the sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80–0.91) and the specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80–0.91). The studies mostly used case-control designs with visual and quantitative assessments. 18F-FDG PET exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating dementia subtypes, particularly AD, FTD, and DLB. This method, while not a standalone diagnostic tool, significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy in uncertain cases, complementing clinical assessments and structural imaging.

25 October 2022 in Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YSYong Soo Shim
Yong Soo Shim
DYDong Won Yang
Dong Won Yang
SHSeongHee Ho
SeongHee Ho
YHYun Jeong Hong
Yun Jeong Hong
JJJee Hyang Jeong
Jee Hyang Jeong
SKSeung Wan Kang
Seung Wan Kang
Shim Y, et al. Dement Neurocogn Disord. 2022 Oct;21(4):126-137. https://doi.org/10.12779/dnd.2022.21.4.126