Jochen Krauss

Prof. Jochen Krauss

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2009 in Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMikko Kuussaari
Mikko Kuussaari
RBRiccardo Bommarco
Riccardo Bommarco
RHRisto K. Heikkinen
Risto K. Heikkinen
AHAveliina Helm
Aveliina Helm
JKJochen Krauss
Jochen Krauss
ISIngolf Steffan-Dewenter
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter

17 August 2016 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSantiago Soliveres
Santiago Soliveres
FPFons van der Plas
Fons van der Plas
PMPeter Manning
Peter Manning
DPDaniel Prati
Daniel Prati
MGMartin M. Gossner
Martin M. Gossner
EAEric Allan
Eric Allan

16 April 2010 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJochen Krauss
Jochen Krauss
RBRiccardo Bommarco
Riccardo Bommarco
MGMoisès Guardiola
Moisès Guardiola
RHRisto K. Heikkinen
Risto K. Heikkinen
AHAveliina Helm
Aveliina Helm
ISIngolf Steffan‐Dewenter
Ingolf Steffan‐Dewenter
Ecology Letters (2010) 13: 597–605 Intensification or abandonment of agricultural land use has led to a severe decline of semi‐natural habitats across Europe. This can cause immediate loss of species but also time‐delayed extinctions, known as the extinction debt. In a pan‐European study of 147 fragmented grassland remnants, we found differences in the extinction debt of species from different trophic levels. Present‐day species richness of long‐lived vascular plant specialists was better explained by past than current landscape patterns, indicating an extinction debt. In contrast, short‐lived butterfly specialists showed no evidence for an extinction debt at a time scale of c. 40 years. Our results indicate that management strategies maintaining the status quo of fragmented habitats are insufficient, as time‐delayed extinctions and associated co‐extinctions will lead to further biodiversity loss in the future.

30 November 2016 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMartin M. Gossner
Martin M. Gossner
TLThomas M. Lewinsohn
Thomas M. Lewinsohn
TKTiemo Kahl
Tiemo Kahl
FGFabrice Grassein
Fabrice Grassein
SBSteffen Boch
Steffen Boch
EAEric Allan
Eric Allan

7 April 2019 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EMEmily A. Martin
Emily A. Martin
MDMatteo Dainese
Matteo Dainese
YCYann Clough
Yann Clough
ABAndrás Báldi
András Báldi
RBRiccardo Bommarco
Riccardo Bommarco
ISIngolf Steffan-Dewenter
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter

20 October 2015 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SGSagrario Gámez-Virués
Sagrario Gámez-Virués
DPDavid J. Perović
David J. Perović
MGMartin M. Gossner
Martin M. Gossner
CBCarmen Börschig
Carmen Börschig
NBNico Blüthgen
Nico Blüthgen
CWCatrin Westphal
Catrin Westphal
Biodiversity loss can affect the viability of ecosystems by decreasing the ability of communities to respond to environmental change and disturbances. Agricultural intensification is a major driver of biodiversity loss and has multiple components operating at different spatial scales: from in-field management intensity to landscape-scale simplification. Here we show that landscape-level effects dominate functional community composition and can even buffer the effects of in-field management intensification on functional homogenization, and that animal communities in real-world managed landscapes show a unified response (across orders and guilds) to both landscape-scale simplification and in-field intensification. Adults and larvae with specialized feeding habits, species with shorter activity periods and relatively small body sizes are selected against in simplified landscapes with intense in-field management. Our results demonstrate that the diversity of land cover types at the landscape scale is critical for maintaining communities, which are functionally diverse, even in landscapes where in-field management intensity is high.