Scott A. Walper

Scott A. Walper


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 March 2020 in Frontiers in Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JCJulie C. Caruana
Julie C. Caruana
Scott A. WalperScott A. Walper
Scott A. Walper
Bacterial membrane vesicles are proteoliposomal nanoparticles produced by both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. As they originate from the outer surface of the bacteria, their composition and content is generally similar to the parent bacterium’s membrane and cytoplasm. However, there is ample evidence that preferential packaging of proteins, metabolites, and toxins into vesicles does occur. Incorporation into vesicles imparts a number of benefits to the cargo, including protection from degradation by other bacteria, the host organism, or environmental factors, maintenance of a favorable microenvironment for enzymatic activity, and increased potential for long-distance movement. This enables vesicles to serve specialized functions tailored to changing or challenging environments, particularly in regard to microbial community interactions including quorum sensing, biofilm formation, antibiotic resistance, antimicrobial peptide expression and deployment, and nutrient acquisition. Additionally, based on their contents, vesicles play crucial roles in host-microbe interactions as carriers of virulence factors and other modulators of host cell function. Here, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of how vesicles to function as signals both within microbial communities and between pathogenic or commensal microbes and their mammalian hosts. We also highlight a few areas that are currently ripe for additional research, including the mechanisms of selective cargo packaging into membrane vesicles and of cargo processing once it enters mammalian host cells, the function of vesicles in transfer of nucleic acids among bacteria, and the possibility of engineering commensal bacteria to deliver cargo of interest to mammalian hosts in a controlled manner.

1 November 2019 in ACS Catalysis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Gregory EllisGregory Ellis
Gregory Ellis
WKWilliam P. Klein
William P. Klein
Guillermo Lasarte-AragonesGuillermo Lasarte-Aragones
Guillermo Lasarte-Aragones
MTMeghna Thakur
Meghna Thakur
Scott A. WalperScott A. Walper
Scott A. Walper
Igor MedintzIgor Medintz
Igor Medintz
Artificial multienzyme scaffolds are being developed for in vitro cascaded biocatalytic activity and, in particular, accessing substrate channeling. This review covers progress in this field over the last ∼5 years with a specific focus on the scaffold materials themselves and the benefits they can provide for assembling multienzyme cascades in vitro. These benefits include improving biocatalytic efficiency, bypassing potential cellular toxicity, directed catalysis, modularity, incorporating enzymes from different prokaryotic and eukaryotic sources, and potentially the ability to create de novo designer cascades. We begin with an overview of the strongest impetus currently driving the rapid development of this field, namely, biomanufacturing and cell-free synthetic biology. We then discuss in detail pertinent mechanisms responsible for the benefits of artificial multienzyme scaffolds. In particular, we focus on substrate channeling, including the evolving debate about what leads to substrate channeling in artificial systems─proximity, confinement, or both─and whether sequential enzyme order is really needed. How different scaffold materials/chemistries can in turn affect enzyme activity is also discussed. The bulk of the review then details progress in the development of different biotic (e.g., cells) and abiotic (e.g., nanoparticles) scaffolding materials and is divided up by class and subtype as needed. Within each material class of scaffolds, attention is given to their inherent chemical diversity, how they are engineered, how they allow for enzymatic attachment, their ease of use, their benefits (e.g., inherent three-dimensional architecture) and liabilities where appropriate, and other relevant issues. For each scaffolding material, a detailed overview of current progress is provided using examples of multienzyme cascades and data/schematics reproduced from the literature. Special attention is also given to the use of DNA scaffolds, as they can potentially provide the most versatile designer three-dimensional scaffold architectures. Finally, a short perspective on how this rapidly moving field will evolve in the near and long terms is provided.

29 January 2019 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDScott N. Dean
Scott N. Dean
DLDagmar H. Leary
Dagmar H. Leary
CSClaretta J. Sullivan
Claretta J. Sullivan
EOEunkeu Oh
Eunkeu Oh
Scott A. WalperScott A. Walper
Scott A. Walper
Bacterial membrane vesicles have been implicated in a broad range of functions in microbial communities from pathogenesis to gene transfer. Though first thought to be a phenomenon associated with Gram-negative bacteria, vesicle production in Staphylococcus aureus, Lactobacillus plantarum, and other Gram-positives has recently been described. Given that many Lactobacillus species are Generally Regarded as Safe and often employed as probiotics, the engineering of Lactobacillus membrane vesicles presents a new avenue for the development of therapeutics and vaccines. Here we characterize and compare the membrane vesicles (MVs) from three different Lactobacillus species (L. acidophilus ATCC 53544, L. casei ATCC 393, and L. reuteri ATCC 23272), with the aim of developing future strategies for vesicle engineering. We characterize the vesicles from each Lactobacillus species comparing the physiochemical properties and protein composition of each. More than 80 protein components from Lactobacillus-derived MVs were identified, including some that were enriched in the vesicles themselves suggesting vesicles as a vehicle for antimicrobial delivery. Additionally, for each species vesicular proteins were categorized based on biological pathway and examined for subcellular localization signals in an effort to identify possible sorting mechanisms for MV proteins.

6 August 2018 in ACS Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Scott A. WalperScott A. Walper
Scott A. Walper
Guillermo Lasarte-AragonesGuillermo Lasarte-Aragones
Guillermo Lasarte-Aragones
KSKim E. Sapsford
Kim E. Sapsford
CBCarl W. Brown
Carl W. Brown
CRClare E. Rowland
Clare E. Rowland
Igor MedintzIgor Medintz
Igor Medintz
Although a fundamental understanding of the pathogenicity of most biothreat agents has been elucidated and available treatments have increased substantially over the past decades, they still represent a significant public health threat in this age of (bio)terrorism, indiscriminate warfare, pollution, climate change, unchecked population growth, and globalization. The key step to almost all prevention, protection, prophylaxis, post-exposure treatment, and mitigation of any bioagent is early detection. Here, we review available methods for detecting bioagents including pathogenic bacteria and viruses along with their toxins. An introduction placing this subject in the historical context of previous naturally occurring outbreaks and efforts to weaponize selected agents is first provided along with definitions and relevant considerations. An overview of the detection technologies that find use in this endeavor along with how they provide data or transduce signal within a sensing configuration follows. Current “gold” standards for biothreat detection/diagnostics along with a listing of relevant FDA approved in vitro diagnostic devices is then discussed to provide an overview of the current state of the art. Given the 2014 outbreak of Ebola virus in Western Africa and the recent 2016 spread of Zika virus in the Americas, discussion of what constitutes a public health emergency and how new in vitro diagnostic devices are authorized for emergency use in the U.S. are also included. The majority of the Review is then subdivided around the sensing of bacterial, viral, and toxin biothreats with each including an overview of the major agents in that class, a detailed cross-section of different sensing methods in development based on assay format or analytical technique, and some discussion of related microfluidic lab-on-a-chip/point-of-care devices. Finally, an outlook is given on how this field will develop from the perspective of the biosensing technology itself and the new emerging threats they may face.

8 November 2019 in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MTMeghna Thakur
Meghna Thakur
IMIgor L. Medintz
Igor L. Medintz
Scott A. WalperScott A. Walper
Scott A. Walper
Organophosphate compounds are ubiquitously employed as agricultural pesticides and maintained as chemical warfare agents by several nations. These compounds are highly toxic, show environmental persistence and accumulation, and contribute to numerous cases of poisoning and death each year. While their use as weapons of mass destruction is rare, these never fully disappear into obscurity as they continue to be tools of fear and control by governments and terrorist organizations. Beyond weaponization, their wide-scale dissemination as agricultural products has led to environmental accumulation and intoxication of soil and water across the globe. Therefore, there is a dire need for rapid and safe agents for environmental bioremediation, personal decontamination, and as therapeutic detoxicants. Organophosphate hydrolyzing enzymes are emerging as appealing targets to satisfy decontamination needs owing to their ability to hydrolyze both pesticides and nerve agents using biologically-derived materials safe for both the environment and the individual. As the release of genetically modified organisms is not widely accepted practice, researchers are exploring alternative strategies of organophosphate bioremediation that focus on cell-free enzyme systems. In this review, we first discuss several of the more prevalent organophosphorus hydrolyzing enzymes along with research and engineering efforts that have led to an enhancement in their activity, substrate tolerance, and stability. In the later half we focus on advances achieved through research focusing on enhancing the catalytic activity and stability of phosphotriesterase, a model organophosphate hydrolase, using various approaches such as nanoparticle display, DNA scaffolding, and outer membrane vesicle encapsulation.

29 October 2015 in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NANathan J. J Alves
Nathan J. J Alves
KTKendrick B. Turner
Kendrick B. Turner
MDMichael A. Daniele
Michael A. Daniele
EOEunkeu Oh
Eunkeu Oh
IMIgor L. Medintz
Igor L. Medintz
Scott A. WalperScott A. Walper
Scott A. Walper