John Smith

Mr. John Smith

School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 November 2019 in Microorganisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JDJanina Golob Deeb
Janina Golob Deeb
JSJohn Smith
John Smith
BBBenjamin Belvin
Benjamin Belvin
JLJanina Lewis
Janina Lewis
Kinga Grzech-LeśniakKinga Grzech-Leśniak
Kinga Grzech-Leśniak
The erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser is used to treat periodontal disease; however, its effectiveness at killing oral bacteria is not well known. Furthermore, the compounding effect of the combination of a laser treatment and irrigation methods with antimicrobials on bacterial viability is yet to be determined. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of the Er:YAG laser with irrigation using chlorhexidine (CHX), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), or sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on the viability of oral bacteria. Three bacterial species were used in our study: Streptococcus gordonii, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Porphyromonas gingivalis. Bacteria were grown in an anaerobic chamber in brain heart infusion broth and incubated at 37 °C. Bacterial samples with an OD of 0.5 were irradiated with the Er:YAG laser at 2940 nm using a 400-µm Varian tip. The experiment was repeated four times using these parameters: 40 mJ, 40 Hz, and 1.6 W for 20 seconds with the 300 µs short pulse duration in contact mode. Treatment groups consisted of the following: (1) no treatment, (2) 0.5% H2O2 alone, (3) 0.5% NaOCl alone, (4) 0.03% CHX alone, (5) Er:YAG irradiation alone, (6) Er:YAG irradiation with 0.5% H2O2, (7) Er:YAG irradiation with 0.5% NaOCl, and (8) Er:YAG irradiation with 0.03% CHX. Microbial viability was determined through plating and colony counts and calculated into CFU/ml. Statistical analysis was done using a two-tailed paired t-test. The use of the Er:YAG laser alone failed to show statistically significant antibacterial activity against any of bacteria. The most effective mono-treatment with irrigation solutions for all three bacteria were 0.5% H2O2 and 0.5% NaOCl (p < 0.001 for each solution). Irrigation with 0.03% CHX was most effective against F. nucleatum (p < 0.01) and less against P. gingivalis and S. gordonii and showed the least antibacterial action alone but improved significantly in combination therapy (p < 0.05). The combined treatment with the Er:YAG showed the greatest and most significant improvement in the reduction of bacterial viability compared to any other treatment group (p < 0.05 for each combined treatment). Irradiation with the Er:YAG laser with the addition of 0.5% H2O2, 0.5% NaOCl, or 0.03% CHX under a short working time (20 s) resulted in a significant reduction of bacterial viability for all three bacterial species compared with any single treatment option. The combination of irradiation with the Er:YAG laser with the addition of 0.5% H2O2, 0.5% NaOCl, or 0.03% CHX resulted in a larger reduction of bacterial survival when compared to monotherapies with antimicrobial solutions or laser. The combination of the Er:YAG laser with a low concentration irrigant solution of 0.5% H2O2, 0.5% NaOCl, or 0.03% CHX could be an effective treatment protocol for the reduction of periodontal pathogens and thus suitable treatment for non-surgical periodontal therapy.

22 July 2019 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
JDJanina Golob Deeb
Janina Golob Deeb
JSJohn Smith
John Smith
BBBenjamin Belvin
Benjamin Belvin
JLJanina Lewis
Janina Lewis
Kinga Grzech-LeśniakKinga Grzech-Leśniak
Kinga Grzech-Leśniak
Introduction: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser with irrigation using chlorhexidine (CHX), hydrogen peroxide or sodium hypochlorite on Streptococcus gordonii (Sg), Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn) and Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg). Material and Methods: Bacterial samples were grown in an anaerobic chamber in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth and incubated at 37°C. An optical density (OD) at 660 nm was taken and a working solution was diluted to an OD of 0.5 which corresponded to a cell density of 106 cells/µl. The samples were irradiated with the Er:YAG laser at 2940nm using a 400 µm Varian tip. The experiment was repeated four times using these parameters: 40mJ; 40Hz; 1.6W for 20 seconds with the 300 µs short pulse duration in contact mode. Treatment groups consisted of: 1: no treatment, 2: 0.5% H2O2 alone, 3: 0.5% NaOCl alone, 4: 0.03% Chlorhexidine alone 5: Er:YAG alone, 6: Er:YAG irradiation with 0.5% H2O2, 7: Er:YAG irradiation with 0.5% NaOCl, 8: Er:YAG irradiation with 0.03% Chlorhexidine. Statistical analysis was done using a one-tailed independent t-test. Results: Er:YAG laser treatment plus the addition of 0.5% H2O2, 0.5% NaOCl, or 0.03% CHX resulted in a significant decrease in the survival of bacteria. Conclusions: The combination of the laser with 0.5% H2O2, 0.5% NaOCl, or 0.03% CHX could be an effective treatment protocol for periodontal pocket therapy.