Ying Liu

Dr. Ying Liu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 June 2020 in RSC Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GKGaizhen Kuang
Gaizhen Kuang
QZQingfei Zhang
Qingfei Zhang
SHShasha He
Shasha He
YLYing Liu
Ying Liu
Curcumin (Cur) can be used as a photosensitizer in the photodynamic therapy (PDT) of cancer, but its low bioavailability limits further clinical application. A mesoporous silica-based drug delivery system (PEGylated mesoporous silica nanoparticles, MSN-PEG@Cur) was designed to solve the problem. The successful preparation of MSN-PEG@Cur was characterized by several physico-chemistry techniques. The endocytosis, ROS generation and in vitro anti-cancer efficacy of MSN-PEG@Cur were evaluated in detail step by step. The results indicated that MSN-PEG@Cur could be effectively endocytosed into cells and release Cur, which can promptly generate ROS upon irradiation, achieving effective PDT in cancer treatment. This MSNs-based drug delivery system provides an alternative strategy for Cur loading and PDT of cancer.

2 April 2019 in Cancer Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJing Huang
Jing Huang
BXBingHe Xu
BingHe Xu
YLYing Liu
Ying Liu
JHJunxing Huang
Junxing Huang
PLPing Lu
Ping Lu
XWXi Wang
Xi Wang
Background: The benefit of systemic treatments in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) which has progressed after chemotherapy is still uncertain and optimal regimens based on randomized trials have not yet been established. We aimed to compare the efficacy of irinotecan plus S‐1 with S‐1 monotherapy in recurrent or metastatic ESCC patients who had resistance to platinum‐ or taxane‐based chemotherapy. Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized, multicenter, open‐label, phase 3 trial in 15 centers across China. Eligible patients were adults with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic ESCC, and were randomly assigned (ratio, 1:1) to receive either irinotecan plus S‐1 (intravenous infusion of irinotecan [160 mg/m 2 ] on day 1 and oral S‐1 [80–120 mg] on days 1–10, repeated every 14 days) or oral S‐1 monotherapy (80–120 mg/day on days 1–14, repeated every 21 days) using a central computerized minimization procedure. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS). Results: Between December 23, 2014 and July 25, 2016, we screened 148 patients and randomly assigned 123 patients to receive either irinotecan plus S‐1 regimen ( n = 61) or S‐1 monotherapy ( n = 62). After a median follow‐up of 29.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.5–40.9 months), the median PFS was significantly longer in the irinotecan plus S‐1 group than in the S‐1 monotherapy group (3.8 months [95% CI 2.9–4.3 months] vs. 1.7 months [95% CI 1.4–2.7 months], hazard ratio = 0.58, 95% CI 0.38–0.86, P = 0.006). The objective response rates were 24.6% in the irinotecan plus S‐1 group and 9.7% in the S‐1 monotherapy group ( P = 0.002). The patients in the irinotecan plus S‐1 group presented with increased rates of grade 3–4 leukopenia (16.4% vs. 0%), neutropenia (14.8% vs. 1.6%), and nausea (4.9% vs. 0%). No significant difference in grade 3–4 diarrhea and no treatment‐related deaths were observed in both groups. Conclusions: The combination of irinotecan with S‐1 was similarly tolerable but significantly prolonged PFS compared to S‐1 monotherapy as a second‐ or third‐line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic ESCC. Clinical Trial Registration NCT02319187. Registered on December 9, 2014

1 June 2019 in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DLDanyang Li
Danyang Li
SXShuning Xu
Shuning Xu
MSMiaomiao Sun
Miaomiao Sun
LQLei Qiao
Lei Qiao
LWLifeng Wang
Lifeng Wang
YLYing Liu
Ying Liu
Rationale: Ameloblastoma is generally characterized as a benign tumor originating in odontogenic epithelium. However, few cases of metastatic malignant ameloblastoma have also been reported. Due to the low incidence of malignant ameloblastoma, there is no established treatment regimen. To explore effective treatment for malignant ameloblastoma, we reported this case study. Patients concerns: This report described a case of a 28-year-old malignant ameloblastoma female patient with multiple metastasis (brain and lung). Diagnoses: The patient presented ameloblastoma of the left mandible in 2012. Three years later, local recurrence and brain metastasis was observed during a follow-up examination. Five years later, malignant ameloblastoma was detected by imaging and immunohistochemistry in the bilateral multiple pulmonary nodules and mediastinal lymph nodes. Interventions: The patient was initially treated with tumor resection. Three years later after local recurrence and brain metastasis, she was accepted the extensive mandibulectomy supplemented with brain stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). When diagnosed with pulmonary metastasis, the patient received combined chemotherapy regimen of MAID (mesna, adriamycin, ifosfamide and dacarbazine) for 6 cycles. Outcomes: The efficacy evaluation was partial remission (PR) after the 6 cycles of MAID. The last patient follow-up was July 24th 2018, and no evidence of progression was observed. The progression-free survival (PFS) of the patient was more than 9 months. Lessons: Surgical resection is the optimal treatment for locally recurrent ameloblastoma. SBRT may be an effective treatment for unresectable oligometastasis of malignant ameloblastoma. Finally, combined chemotherapy of MAID showed encouraging effects in the management of metastatic malignant ameloblastoma.

20 January 2015 in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YLYing Liu
Ying Liu
ZRZhonghai Ren
Zhonghai Ren
SXShuning Xu
Shuning Xu
HBHua Bai
Hua Bai
NMNing Ma
Ning Ma
FWFeng Wang
Feng Wang
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-dose-intensity bevacizumab and weekly irinotecan as salvage treatment for patients with platinum- and taxanes-resistant advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Fifty-two patients with platinum- and taxanes-resistant advanced epithelial ovarian cancer received bevacizumab 5 mg/Kg days 1 and 15; irinotecan 60 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and 15. The combined therapy was repeated every 28 days, up to six cycles. A total of 230 cycles of bevacizumab combined with irinotecan were administrated to 52 patients. Among the 52 patients, 22 patients achieved partial response (42.3 %); 12 patients had stable disease (23.1 %) and 18 patients experienced disease progression (34.6 %). The median progression-free survival and the median overall survival were 8.0 months (95 % confidence interval: 6.74–9.26 months) and 13.8 months (95 % confidence interval: 11.97–15.63 months), respectively. The most frequent grade 3–4 hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (11.5 %) and thrombocytopenia (3.8 %). The non-hematologic toxicities included grade 3 diarrhea (3.8 %) and hypertension (3.8 %). Two patients (3.8 %) were confirmed with deep vein thrombosis. Febrile neutropenia, symptomatic cardiac dysfunction and gastrointestinal perforation were not observed in this study. The combination of low-dose-intensity bevacizumab and weekly irinotecan was an effective and safe regimen for patients with platinum- and taxanes-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer.