This Opinion article outlines a set of research priorities, based on discussions held at the 2015 Helene Harris Memorial Trust Ovarian Cancer Action meeting, that the authors believe will reduce incidence and improve outcomes for women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer. High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) accounts for 70–80% of ovarian cancer deaths, and overall survival has not changed significantly for several decades. In this Opinion article, we outline a set of research priorities that we believe will reduce incidence and improve outcomes for women with this disease. This 'roadmap' for HGSOC was determined after extensive discussions at an Ovarian Cancer Action meeting in January 2015.

The genomic complexity of profound copy number aberrations has prevented effective molecular stratification of ovarian cancers. Here, to decode this complexity, we derived copy number signatures from shallow whole-genome sequencing of 117 high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) cases, which were validated on 527 independent cases. We show that HGSOC comprises a continuum of genomes shaped by multiple mutational processes that result in known patterns of genomic aberration. Copy number signature exposures at diagnosis predict both overall survival and the probability of platinum-resistant relapse. Measurement of signature exposures provides a rational framework to choose combination treatments that target multiple mutational processes.

This manuscript reports the consensus statements regarding recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), reached at the fifth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference (OCCC), which was held in Tokyo, Japan, in November 2015. Three important questions were identified: (i) What are the subgroups for clinical trials in ROC? The historical definition of using platinum-free interval (PFI) to categorise patients as having platinum-sensitive/resistant disease was replaced by therapy-free interval (TFI). TFI can be broken down into TFIp (PFI), TFInp (non-PFI) and TFIb (biological agent-free interval). Additional criteria to consider include histology, BRCA mutation status, number/type of previous therapies, outcome of prior surgery and patient reported symptoms. (ii) What are the control arms for clinical trials in ROC? When platinum is considered the best option, the control arm should be a platinum-based therapy with or without an anti-angiogenic agent or a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor. If platinum is not considered the best option, the control arm could include a non-platinum drug, either as single agent or in combination. (iii) What are the endpoints for clinical trials in ROC? Overall survival (OS) is the preferred endpoint for patient cohorts with an expected median OS < or = 12 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) is an alternative, and it is the preferred endpoint when the expected median OS is > 12 months. However, PFS alone should not be the only endpoint and must be supported by additional endpoints including pre-defined patient reported outcomes (PROs), time to second subsequent therapy (TSST), or time until definitive deterioration of quality of life (TUDD).

Purpose: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors selectively target homologous recombination (HR)–defective cells and show good clinical activity in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. A high proportion (up to 50%) of sporadic epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC) could be deficient in HR due to genetic or epigenetic inactivation of BRCA1/BRCA2 or other HR genes. Therefore, there is a potential for extending the use of PARP inhibitors to these patients if HR status can be identified. We developed a functional assay of HR status in primary cultures of EOCs based on Rad51 focus formation that correlates well with sensitivity to the potent PARP inhibitor AG014699.

Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2), components of the homologous recombination DNA repair (HRR) pathway, are associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are selectively cytotoxic to animal cells with defective HRR, but results in human cancer cells have been contradictory. We undertook, to our knowledge, the first comprehensive in vitro and in vivo investigations of the antitumor activity of the PARP inhibitor AG014699 in human cancer cells carrying mutated or epigenetically silenced BRCA1/2. We used nine human cell lines, four with nonmutated BRCA1/2 (MCF7, MDA-MB-231, and HCC1937-BRCA1 [breast cancer] and OSEC-2 [ovarian surface epithelial]), two with mutated BRCA1 (MDA-MB-436 and HCC1937 [breast cancer]), one with mutated BRCA2 (CAPAN-1 [pancreatic cancer]), one that was heterozygous for BRCA2 (OSEC-1 [ovarian surface epithelial]), and one with epigenetically silenced BRCA1 (UACC3199 [breast cancer]), and two Chinese hamster ovary cell lines, parental AA8 and XRCC3 mutated IRS 1SF. We assessed cytotoxicity, DNA damage, and HRR function. Antitumor activity of AG014699 was determined by growth of xenograft tumors (five mice per treatment group). Long-term safety of AG014699 was assessed. AG014699 (≤10 μM) was cytotoxic to cells with mutated BRCA1/2 or XRCC3 and to UACC3199 cells with epigenetically silenced BRCA1 but not to cells without BRCA1/2 or XRCC3 mutations or that were heterozygous for BRCA2 mutation. AG014699 induced DNA double-strand breaks in all nine cell lines studied. HRR was observed only in cells with functional BRCA1/2 proteins. Growth of xenograft tumors with BRCA1/2 mutations or with epigenetically silenced BRCA1 was reduced by AG014699 treatment, and combination treatment with AG014699 plus carboplatin was more effective than either drug alone. AG014699 was not toxic in mice with nonmutated or heterozygous BRCA2. Human cancer cells or xenograft tumors with mutated or epigenetically silenced BRCA1/2 were sensitive to AG014699 monotherapy, indicating a potential role for PARP inhibitors in sporadic human cancers.