Ludmilla Aguiar

Dr. Ludmilla Aguiar


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 October 2010 in Mammal Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EBEnrico Bernard
Enrico Bernard
LALudmilla Aguiar
Ludmilla Aguiar
RMRicardo B. Machado
Ricardo B. Machado

9 March 2011 in Journal of Applied Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Christoph MeyerChristoph Meyer
Christoph Meyer
LALudmilla Aguiar
Ludmilla Aguiar
LALuis F. Aguirre
Luis F. Aguirre
JBJulio Baumgarten
Julio Baumgarten
FCFrank M. Clarke
Frank M. Clarke
EKElisabeth K. V. Kalko
Elisabeth K. V. Kalko

1 June 2017 in Landscape and Urban Planning
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RMRicardo B. Machado
Ricardo B. Machado
LALudmilla Aguiar
Ludmilla Aguiar
GJGareth Jones
Gareth Jones

2 November 2016 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RSRodrigo Augusto Lima Santos
Rodrigo Augusto Lima Santos
SSSara M. Santos
Sara M. Santos
MSMargarida Santos-Reis
Margarida Santos-Reis
AFAlmir Picanço de Figueiredo
Almir Picanço de Figueiredo
ABAlex Bager
Alex Bager
FAFernando Ascensão
Fernando Ascensão
Carcass persistence time and detectability are two main sources of uncertainty on roadkill surveys. In this study, we evaluate the influence of these uncertainties on roadkill surveys and estimates. To estimate carcass persistence time, three observers (including the driver) surveyed 114km by car on a monthly basis for two years, searching for wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVC). Each survey consisted of five consecutive days. To estimate carcass detectability, we randomly selected stretches of 500m to be also surveyed on foot by two other observers (total 292 walked stretches, 146 km walked). We expected that body size of the carcass, road type, presence of scavengers and weather conditions to be the main drivers influencing the carcass persistence times, but their relative importance was unknown. We also expected detectability to be highly dependent on body size. Overall, we recorded low median persistence times (one day) and low detectability (<10%) for all vertebrates. The results indicate that body size and landscape cover (as a surrogate of scavengers’ presence) are the major drivers of carcass persistence. Detectability was lower for animals with body mass less than 100g when compared to carcass with higher body mass. We estimated that our recorded mortality rates underestimated actual values of mortality by 2–10 fold. Although persistence times were similar to previous studies, the detectability rates here described are very different from previous studies. The results suggest that detectability is the main source of bias across WVC studies. Therefore, more than persistence times, studies should carefully account for differing detectability when comparing WVC studies.

23 April 2018 in Mammal Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AAAdriana Arias-Aguilar
Adriana Arias-Aguilar
FHFrederico Hintze
Frederico Hintze
LALudmilla Aguiar
Ludmilla Aguiar
VRVincent Rufray
Vincent Rufray
EBEnrico Bernard
Enrico Bernard
MPMaria João Ramos Pereira
Maria João Ramos Pereira

21 October 2021 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LALudmilla Aguiar
Ludmilla Aguiar
IBIgor D. Bueno-Rocha
Igor D. Bueno-Rocha
GOGuilherme Oliveira
Guilherme Oliveira
EPEder S. Pires
Eder S. Pires
SVSantelmo Vasconcelos
Santelmo Vasconcelos
PTPedro H. B. Togni
Pedro H. B. Togni
Insectivorous bats provide ecosystem services in agricultural and urban landscapes by consuming arthropods that are considered pests. Bat species inhabiting cities are expected to consume insects associated with urban areas, such as mosquitoes, flying termites, moths, and beetles. We captured insectivorous bats in the Federal District of Brazil and used fecal DNA metabarcoding to investigate the arthropod consumed by five bat species living in colonies in city buildings, and ascertained whether their predation was related to ecosystem services. These insectivorous bat species were found to consume 83 morphospecies of arthropods and among these 41 were identified to species, most of which were agricultural pests. We propose that bats may roost in the city areas and forage in the nearby agricultural fields using their ability to fly over long distances. We also calculated the value of the pest suppression ecosystem service by the bats. By a conservative estimation, bats save US$ 94 per hectare of cornfields, accounting for an annual savings of US$ 390.6 million per harvest in Brazil. Our study confirms that, regardless of their roosting location, bats are essential for providing ecosystem services in the cities, with extensive impacts on crops and elsewhere, in addition to significant savings in the use of pesticides.