Timothy Douglas

Dr. Timothy Douglas


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 December 2008 in Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PWPatrick H. Warnke
Patrick H. Warnke
TDTimothy Douglas
Timothy Douglas
PWPatrick Wollny
Patrick Wollny
ESEugene Sherry
Eugene Sherry
MSMartin Steiner
Martin Steiner
SSSureshan Sivananthan
Sureshan Sivananthan
Selective laser melting (SLM), a method used in the nuclear, space, and racing industries, allows the creation of customized titanium alloy scaffolds with highly defined external shape and internal structure using rapid prototyping as supporting external structures within which bone tissue can grow. Human osteoblasts were cultured on SLM-produced Ti6Al4V mesh scaffolds to demonstrate biocompatibility using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), fluorescence microscopy after cell vitality staining, and common biocompatibility tests (lactate dihydrogenase (LDH), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU), and water soluble tetrazolium (WST)). Cell occlusion of pores of different widths (0.45–1.2 mm) was evaluated. Scaffolds were tested for resistance to compressive force. SEM investigations showed osteoblasts with well-spread morphology and multiple contact points. Cell vitality staining and biocompatibility tests confirmed osteoblast vitality and proliferation on the scaffolds. Pore overgrowth increased during 6 weeks' culture at pore widths of 0.45 and 0.5 mm, and in the course of 3 weeks for pore widths of 0.55, 0.6, and 0.7 mm. No pore occlusion was observed on pores of width 0.9–1.2 mm. Porosity and maximum compressive load at failure increased and decreased with increasing pore width, respectively. In summary, the scaffolds are biocompatible, and pore width influences pore overgrowth, resistance to compressive force, and porosity.

4 April 2019 in Frontiers in Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMariia Saveleva
Mariia Saveleva
KEKaraneh Eftekhari
Karaneh Eftekhari
AAAnatolii Abalymov
Anatolii Abalymov
TDTimothy Douglas
Timothy Douglas
Dmitry VolodkinDmitry Volodkin
Dmitry Volodkin
ASAndre Skirtach
Andre Skirtach
Hybrid materials, or hybrids incorporating both organic and inorganic constituents, are emerging as a very potent and promising class of materials due to the diverse, but complementary nature of the properties inherent of these different classes of materials. The complementarity leads to a perfect synergy of properties of desired material and eventually an end-product. The diversity of resultant properties and materials used in the construction of hybrids, leads to a very broad range of application areas generated by engaging very different research communities. We provide here a general classification of hybrid materials, wherein organics–in-inorganics (inorganic materials modified by organic moieties) are distinguished from inorganics–in–organics (organic materials or matrices modified by inorganic constituents). In the former area, the surface functionalization of colloids is distinguished as a stand-alone sub-area. The latter area—functionalization of organic materials by inorganic additives—is the focus of the current review. Inorganic constituents, often in the form of small particles or structures, are made of minerals, clays, semiconductors, metals, carbons, and ceramics. They are shown to be incorporated into organic matrices, which can be distinguished as two classes: chemical and biological. Chemical organic matrices include coatings, vehicles and capsules assembled into: hydrogels, layer-by-layer assembly, polymer brushes, block co-polymers and other assemblies. Biological organic matrices encompass bio-molecules (lipids, polysaccharides, proteins and enzymes, and nucleic acids) as well as higher level organisms: cells, bacteria, and microorganisms. In addition to providing details of the above classification and analysis of the composition of hybrids, we also highlight some antagonistic yin-&-yang properties of organic and inorganic materials, review applications and provide an outlook to emerging trends.

1 December 2010 in Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KGKaterina Gkioni
Katerina Gkioni
Sander LeeuwenburghSander Leeuwenburgh
Sander Leeuwenburgh
TDTimothy Douglas
Timothy Douglas
AMAntonios G. Mikos
Antonios G. Mikos
JJJohn A. Jansen
John A. Jansen
Hydrogels are an important class of highly hydrated polymers that are widely investigated for potential use in soft tissue engineering. Generally, however, hydrogels lack the ability to mineralize, preventing the formation of chemical bonds with hard tissues such as bone. A recent trend in tissue engineering involves the development of hydrogels that possess the capacity to mineralize. The strategy that has attracted most interest has been the incorporation of inorganic phases such as calcium phosphate ceramics and bioglasses into hydrogel matrices. These inorganic particles act as nucleation sites that enable further mineralization, thus improving the mechanical properties of the composite material. A second route to create nucleation sites for calcification of hydrogels involves the use of features from the physiological mineralization process. Examples of these biomimetic mineralization strategies include (1) soaking of hydrogels in solutions that are saturated with respect to calcium phosphate, (2) incorporation of enzymes that catalyze deposition of bone mineral, and (3) incorporation of synthetic analogues to matrix vesicles that are the initial sites of biomineralization. Functionalization of the polymeric hydrogel backbone with negatively charged groups is a third mechanism to promote mineralization in otherwise inert hydrogels. This review summarizes the main strategies that have been developed in the past decade to calcify hydrogel matrices and render these hydrogels suitable for applications in bone regeneration.

1 July 2006 in Biomacromolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TDTimothy Douglas
Timothy Douglas
SHSascha Heinemann
Sascha Heinemann
SBSusanne Bierbaum
Susanne Bierbaum
DSDieter Scharnweber
Dieter Scharnweber
HWHartmut Worch
Hartmut Worch

20 January 2010 in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PWPatrick H. Warnke
Patrick H. Warnke
Hermann SeitzHermann Seitz
Hermann Seitz
FWFrauke Warnke
Frauke Warnke
SBStephan T. Becker
Stephan T. Becker
SSSureshan Sivananthan
Sureshan Sivananthan
TDTimothy Douglas
Timothy Douglas

7 April 2010 in Clinical Oral Implants Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VGVolker Gassling
Volker Gassling
TDTimothy Douglas
Timothy Douglas
PWPatrick H. Warnke
Patrick H. Warnke
YAYahya Açil
Yahya Açil
JWJörg Wiltfang
Jörg Wiltfang
SBStephan T. Becker
Stephan T. Becker