Phil Lester

Prof. Phil Lester

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 June 2006 in Oecologia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSM. Sarty
M. Sarty
KAK. L. Abbott
K. L. Abbott
PLPhil Lester
Phil Lester

20 December 2010 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NRNúria Roura-Pascual
Núria Roura-Pascual
CHCang Hui
Cang Hui
TITakayoshi Ikeda
Takayoshi Ikeda
GLGwénaël Leday
Gwénaël Leday
DRDavid M. Richardson
David M. Richardson
SWSue P. Worner
Sue P. Worner
Because invasive species threaten the integrity of natural ecosystems, a major goal in ecology is to develop predictive models to determine which species may become widespread and where they may invade. Indeed, considerable progress has been made in understanding the factors that influence the local pattern of spread for specific invaders and the factors that are correlated with the number of introduced species that have become established in a given region. However, few studies have examined the relative importance of multiple drivers of invasion success for widespread species at global scales. Here, we use a dataset of >5,000 presence/absence records to examine the interplay between climatic suitability, biotic resistance by native taxa, human-aided dispersal, and human modification of habitats, in shaping the distribution of one of the world's most notorious invasive species, the Argentine ant ( Linepithema humile ). Climatic suitability and the extent of human modification of habitats are primarily responsible for the distribution of this global invader. However, we also found some evidence for biotic resistance by native communities. Somewhat surprisingly, and despite the often cited importance of propagule pressure as a crucial driver of invasions, metrics of the magnitude of international traded commodities among countries were not related to global distribution patterns. Together, our analyses on the global-scale distribution of this invasive species provide strong evidence for the interplay of biotic and abiotic determinants of spread and also highlight the challenges of limiting the spread and subsequent impact of highly invasive species.

7 January 2019 in Annual Review of Entomology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PLPhil Lester
Phil Lester
Jacqueline BeggsJacqueline Beggs
Jacqueline Beggs
Three species of Vespula have become invasive in Australia, Hawai‘i, New Zealand, and North and South America and continue to spread. These social wasp species can achieve high nest densities, and their behavioral plasticity has led to substantial impacts on recipient communities. Ecologically, they affect all trophic levels, restructuring communities and altering resource flows. Economically, their main negative effect is associated with pollination and the apicultural industry. Climate change is likely to exacerbate their impacts in many regions. Introduced Vespula spp. likely experience some degree of enemy release from predators or parasites, although they are exposed to a wide range of microbial pathogens in both their native and introduced range. Toxic baits have been significantly improved over the last decade, enabling effective landscape-level control. Although investigated extensively, no effective biological control agents have yet been found. Emerging technologies such as gene drives are under consideration.

16 August 2006 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SHStephen Hartley
Stephen Hartley
RHRichard Harris
Richard Harris
PLPhil Lester
Phil Lester

13 June 2002 in Journal of Applied Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PLPhil Lester
Phil Lester
RHR. Harmsen
R. Harmsen
Summary: Functional and numerical responses are key components in the selection of predators for biological control. We examined the relevance of these responses for predicting the effectiveness of generalist predators, taking into account effects of alternative prey and multiple predators. Our system involved two acarine predators of two prey species on apple. Responses were measured on leaf discs in the laboratory, and predictions assessed on small potted apple trees. In particular, we tested three hypotheses. Hypothesis I: the species with the higher predatory responses will be more effective in limiting prey populations. Neither predator had a consistently higher functional response, which depended on prey stage and species. Amblyseius fallacis had a (approximately two times) higher ovipositional response than Typhlodromus pyri. We therefore hypothesized that A. fallacis would be more effective in controlling prey. No evidence was found to support this hypothesis. Hypothesis II: alternative prey reduce the functional response of predators to target prey. Alternative prey did or did not reduce the functional response to target prey, depending on the predator, stage and species of alternative prey. The only consistent trend for both predators was that the predation of Panonychus ulmi deutonymphs was reduced when Tetranychus urticae was present. Hypothesis III: the predator species with the highest mean ovipositional response will out‐compete the other predator species. The number of predators observed in the mixed predator treatments depended on the prey composition. Although A. fallacis had a higher ovipositional response, it was never more abundant. Intraguild predation probably played a role in determining predator abundance, although prey composition altered intraguild effects. These results highlight the complex nature of predator and prey interactions. Because of these interactions, functional and numerical assays on single predator–single prey systems in simplified laboratory environments do not allow predictions of the growth of mixed populations in realistic habitats, or of the effectiveness of predators as biological control agents in the field.

25 October 2017 in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDPeter Dearden
Peter Dearden
NGNeil Gemmell
Neil Gemmell
OMOcean R. Mercier
Ocean R. Mercier
PLPhil Lester
Phil Lester
MSMaxwell Scott
Maxwell Scott
DPDavid R. Penman
David R. Penman
Genetic technologies such as gene editing and gene drive systems have recently emerged as potential tools for pest control. Gene drives, in particular, have been described as potential solutions to the pest problems that beset New Zealand. Here we describe the current state of gene drive technologies and present a series of examples to examine the potential benefits and problems arising from gene drive approaches for pest control in New Zealand. We consider the risks and barriers, both biological and social, that would need to be addressed to deploy such systems against our key pests with particular reference to the unique characteristics of New Zealand’s biota, environment and peoples. Gene drives are a potentially useful technology for the eradication of pests in New Zealand but a great deal of research and understanding, as well as public acceptance, is required before they can be implemented.