Patrik Sleziak

Dr. Patrik Sleziak

Institute of Hydrology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 841 04 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2020 in Journal of Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Patrik SleziakPatrik Sleziak
Patrik Sleziak
JSJ. Szolgay
J. Szolgay
KHK. Hlavčová
K. Hlavčová
MDM. Danko
M. Danko
JPJ. Parajka
J. Parajka

16 June 2016 in Plant Systematics and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MAMaja Al-Beyroutiová
Maja Al-Beyroutiová
MSMiroslav Sabo
Miroslav Sabo
Patrik SleziakPatrik Sleziak
Patrik Sleziak
RDRoman Dušinský
Roman Dušinský
EBErik Birčák
Erik Birčák
MŠMiroslav Švec
Miroslav Švec

29 October 2018 in Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Patrik SleziakPatrik Sleziak
Patrik Sleziak
Jan SzolgayJan Szolgay
Jan Szolgay
KHKamila Hlavčová
Kamila Hlavčová
DDDoris Duethmann
Doris Duethmann
Juraj ParajkaJuraj Parajka
Juraj Parajka
MDMichal Danko
Michal Danko
In many Austrian catchments in recent decades an increase in the mean annual air temperature and precipitation has been observed, but only a small change in the mean annual runoff. The main objective of this paper is (1) to analyze alterations in the performance of a conceptual hydrological model when applied in changing climate conditions and (2) to assess the factors and model parameters that control these changes. A conceptual rainfall-runoff model (the TUW model) was calibrated and validated in 213 Austrian basins from 1981–2010. The changes in the runoff model’s efficiency have been compared with changes in the mean annual precipitation and air temperature and stratified for basins with dominant snowmelt and soil moisture processes. The results indicate that while the model’s efficiency in the calibration period has not changed over the decades, the values of the model’s parameters and hence the model’s performance (i.e., the volume error and the runoff model’s efficiency) in the validation period have changed. The changes in the model’s performance are greater in basins with a dominant soil moisture regime. For these basins, the average volume error which was not used in calibration has increased from 0% (in the calibration periods 1981–1990 or 2001–2010) to 9% (validation period 2001–2010) or –8% (validation period 1981–1990), respectively. In the snow-dominated basins, the model tends to slightly underestimate runoff volumes during its calibration (average volume error = –4%), but the changes in the validation periods are very small (i.e., the changes in the volume error are typically less than 1–2%). The model calibrated in a colder decade (e.g., 1981–1990) tends to overestimate the runoff in a warmer and wetter decade (e.g., 2001–2010), particularly in flatland basins. The opposite case (i.e., the use of parameters calibrated in a warmer decade for a colder, drier decade) indicates a tendency to underestimate runoff. A multidimensional analysis by regression trees showed that the change in the simulated runoff volume is clearly related to the change in precipitation, but the relationship is not linear in flatland basins. The main controlling factor of changes in simulated runoff volumes is the magnitude of the change in precipitation for both groups of basins. For basins with a dominant snowmelt runoff regime, the controlling factors are also the wetness of the basins and the mean annual precipitation. For basins with a soil moisture regime, landcover (forest) plays an important role.

1 June 2015 in Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Patrik SleziakPatrik Sleziak
Patrik Sleziak
KHKamila Hlavčová
Kamila Hlavčová
Jan SzolgayJan Szolgay
Jan Szolgay
The paper presents an analysis of changes in the structure of the average annual discharges, average annual air temperature, and average annual precipitation time series in Slovakia. Three time series with lengths of observation from 1961 to 2006 were analyzed. An introduction to spectral analysis with Fourier analysis (FA) is given. This method is used to determine significant periods of a time series. Later in this article a description of a wavelet transform (WT) is reviewed. This method is able to work with non-stationary time series and detect when significant periods are presented. Subsequently, models for the detection of potential changes in the structure of the time series analyzed were created with the aim of capturing changes in the cyclical components and the multiannual variability of the time series selected for Slovakia. Finally, some of the comparisons of the time series analyzed are discussed. The aim of the paper is to show the advantages of time series analysis using WT compared with FT. The results were processed in the R software environment.

1 December 2016 in Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Patrik SleziakPatrik Sleziak
Patrik Sleziak
Jan SzolgayJan Szolgay
Jan Szolgay
KHKamila Hlavčová
Kamila Hlavčová
Juraj ParajkaJuraj Parajka
Juraj Parajka
The main objective of the paper is to understand how the model’s efficiency and the selected climatic indicators are related. The hydrological model applied in this study is a conceptual rainfall-runoff model (the TUW model), which was developed at the Vienna University of Technology. This model was calibrated over three different periods between 1981-2010 in three groups of Austrian catchments (snow, runoff, and soil catchments), which represent a wide range of the hydroclimatic conditions of Austria. The model’s calibration was performed using a differential evolution algorithm (Deoptim). As an objective function, we used a combination of the Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient (NSE) and the logarithmic Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient (logNSE). The model’s efficiency was evaluated by Volume error (VE). Subsequently, we evaluated the relationship between the model’s efficiency (VE) and changes in the climatic indicators (precipitation ΔP, air temperature ΔT). The implications of findings are discussed in the conclusion.

26 November 2021 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Patrik SleziakPatrik Sleziak
Patrik Sleziak
RVRoman Výleta
Roman Výleta
KHKamila Hlavčová
Kamila Hlavčová
MDMichaela Danacova
Michaela Danacova
MAMilica Aleksić
Milica Aleksić
Silvia KohnovaSilvia Kohnova
Silvia Kohnova
The changing climate is a concern with regard to sustainable water resources. Projections of the runoff in future climate conditions are needed for long-term planning of water resources and flood protection. In this study, we evaluate the possible climate change impacts on the runoff regime in eight selected basins located in the whole territory of Slovakia. The projected runoff in the basins studied for the reference period (1981–2010) and three future time horizons (2011–2040, 2041–2070, and 2071–2100) was simulated using the HBV (Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning) bucket-type model (the TUW (Technische Universität Wien) model). A calibration strategy based on the selection of the most suitable decade in the observation period for the parameterization of the model was applied. The model was first calibrated using observations, and then was driven by the precipitation and air temperatures projected by the KNMI (Koninklijk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut) and MPI (Max Planck Institute) regional climate models (RCM) under the A1B emission scenario. The model’s performance metrics and a visual inspection showed that the simulated runoff using downscaled inputs from both RCM models for the reference period represents the simulated hydrological regimes well. An evaluation of the future, which was performed by considering the representative climate change scenarios, indicated that changes in the long-term runoff’s seasonality and extremality could be expected in the future. In the winter months, the runoff should increase, and decrease in the summer months compared to the reference period. The maximum annual daily runoff could be more extreme for the later time horizons (according to the KNMI scenario for 2071–2100). The results from this study could be useful for policymakers and river basin authorities for the optimum planning and management of water resources under a changing climate.