The 2020 summer Olympic and Paralympic Games in Tokyo were postponed to July–September 2021 due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. While COVID-19 has emerged as a monumental health threat for mass gathering events, heat illness must be acknowledged as a potentially large health threat for maintaining health services. We examined the number of COVID-19 admissions and the Tokyo rule for emergency medical care, in Tokyo, from March to September 2020, and investigated the weekly number of emergency transportations due to heat illness and weekly averages of the daily maximum Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT) in Tokyo in the summer (2016–2020). The peak of emergency transportations due to heat illness overlapped the resurgence of COVID-19 in 2020, and an increase of heat illness patients and WBGT has been observed. Respect for robust science is critical for the decision-making process of mass gathering events during the pandemic, and science-based countermeasures and implementations for COVID-19 will be warranted. Without urgent reconsiderations and sufficient countermeasures, the double burden of COVID-19 and heat-related illnesses in Tokyo will overwhelm the healthcare provision system, and maintaining essential health services will be challenging during the 2021 summer Olympic and Paralympic Games.

In responding to the COVID‐19 pandemic, each country is presented with both opportunities and challenges, some unique and some shared with the global community. It is important to not only recognize, but to embrace them as drivers of the public to the current pandemic success. In this commentary, we discuss the opportunities and challenges that may affect ongoing public health programming in Australia within the current context of epidemiology. COVID‐19 within Australia has to date been effectively suppressed through the implementation of nationally coordinated, in which the state delivered public policy, guidelines and practice, and successful establishment of a comprehensive testing, contact tracing, patient isolation and contact quarantine regime combined with national and state social distancing, hygiene etiquette and movement restrictions. However, despite its success to date great challenges lay ahead for future public health policy with the threat of a second wave, or more likely, multiple smaller outbreaks across various population centres. Therefore, policies that aim to balance the twin socioeconomic and health impacts are crucial. The experience of Australia in managing its COVID‐19 response can provide a case study for other countries to reshape or adapt their policies and actions in the context of emerging global health crises.

Towards the elimination of this global epidemic, understanding the high-risk behaviors of people newly diagnosed with HIV/AIDS (PNDWH) is essential. This study aimed to describe the general characteristics and high-risk behaviors of PNDWH and identify associated factors for adopting high-risk behaviors. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Vietnam to explore the high-risk behaviors of 506 PNDWH. Associated factors were identified using multivariable logistic regressions. 83.2% of participants had sex without using a condom, and 27.9% had more than two sex partners. Among injected drug users, 44% had shared needles with an average number of 2.1 shared partners. Male, Kinh ethnicity (Vietnamese), high income, and high educational level were risk factors for high-risk behaviors. Our findings revealed the first time a comprehensive picture of PNDWH and emphasized the high prevalence of STIs, including untreated STIs and the long delay since the early HIV diagnosis. Also, our model found much higher risk behaviors among participants who were non-adherent to ART and those currently enrolled in ART. By better managing newly-diagnosed cases, better integrating STI management services and prevention consultants, as well as improving ART adherence programs, Vietnam can make better progress towards the complete control of HIV for its most vulnerable populations.

Objective: This systematic review estimated the pooled $R_0$ for early COVID-19 outbreaks and identified the impact of study-related factors such as methods, study location and study period on the estimated $R_0$. Methods: We searched electronic databases for human studies published in English between 1 December 2019 and 30 September 2020 with no restriction on country/region. Two investigators independently performed the data extraction of the studies selected for inclusion during full-text screening. The primary outcome, $R_0$, was analysed by random-effects meta-analysis using the restricted maximum likelihood method. Results: We identified 26,425 studies through our search and included 151 articles in the systematic review, among which 81 were included in the meta-analysis. The estimates of $R_0$ from studies included in the meta-analysis ranged from 0.4 to 12.58. The pooled $R_0$ for COVID-19 was estimated to be 2.66 (95% CI, 2.41–2.94). The results showed heterogeneity among studies and strong evidence of a small-study effect. Conclusions: The high heterogeneity in studies makes the use of the $R_0$ for basic epidemic planning difficult and presents a huge problem for risk assessment and data synthesis. Consensus on the use of $R_0$ for outbreak assessment is needed, and its use for assessing epidemic risk is not recommended.

Although it has been more than 40 years since “health for all” was presented as a focus in the Alma Ata declaration

Background: Monitoring progress and inequality in childhood immunization coverage at both national and sub-national levels is essential for refining equity-oriented health programs and ensuring equitable access to care towards achieving global targets in African countries. Methods and Findings: Using approximately 1 million records from 104 nationally representative Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) conducted in 38 African countries (2000–2019), we estimated childhood immunization coverage for key indicators (BCG, MCV1, DPT3, Polio3, and Full immunization), stratified by socioeconomic status. Variations of Bayesian spatio-temporal analysis using Besag, Besag–York–Mollié (BYM) and BYM2 models were employed to assess and project the trends from 2000 to 2030. We evaluated the probability of achieving Universal Health Coverage (80% coverage) and Immunization Agenda (90% coverage) by 2030, at national and sub-national levels. Finally, we conducted a comprehensive inequality analysis using the Slope Index of Inequality (SII) and Relative Index of Inequality (RII) to assess changes over the study period. Childhood immunization coverage improved significantly across most African countries from 2000 to 2019. However, projections suggest that 12 countries are unlikely to achieve global targets for full immunization by 2030 at the national level if current trends continue. Notably, high-Socio-Demographic Index (SDI) countries such as South Africa, Egypt, and Congo Brazzaville are projected to miss immunization targets across all sub-national regions. While socioeconomic inequalities were widespread in 2000, they are projected to decline or stabilize in 36 countries by 2030, with Eswatini, Morocco, Rwanda, and Burkina Faso expected to eliminate disparities. In contrast, Nigeria and Angola are projected to face increasing inequalities or persistent large gaps. Regional disparities in both coverage and inequality remain pronounced, particularly in Central and Western Africa, where coverage remains low and inequality remains high despite overall national-level improvements. The analysis was limited to DHS surveys 2000–2019, excluding more recent data during the COVID-19 period and potentially overestimating trends in data-sparse settings. Conclusions: This study highlights both progress and persistent challenges in childhood immunization coverage, along with inequalities across 38 African countries. Persistent regional disparities and socioeconomic inequalities require multifaceted strategies that account for demographic, geographic, economic, and political factors to ensure equitable immunization. Greater efforts are needed to close these gaps and support global health goals for the African nations.