Cancer remains an elusive, highly complex disease and a global burden. Constant change by acquired mutations and metabolic reprogramming contribute to the high inter- and intratumor heterogeneity of malignant cells, their selective growth advantage, and their resistance to anticancer therapies. In the modern era of integrative biomedicine, realizing that a personalized approach could benefit therapy treatments and patients’ prognosis, we should focus on cancer-driving advantageous modifications. Namely, reactive oxygen species (ROS), known to act as regulators of cellular metabolism and growth, exhibit both negative and positive activities, as do antioxidants with potential anticancer effects. Such complexity of oxidative homeostasis is sometimes overseen in the case of studies evaluating the effects of potential anticancer antioxidants. While cancer cells often produce more ROS due to their increased growth-favoring demands, numerous conventional anticancer therapies exploit this feature to ensure selective cancer cell death triggered by excessive ROS levels, also causing serious side effects. The activation of the cellular NRF2 (nuclear factor erythroid 2 like 2) pathway and induction of cytoprotective genes accompanies an increase in ROS levels. A plethora of specific targets, including those involved in thioredoxin (TRX) and glutathione (GSH) systems, are activated by NRF2. In this paper, we briefly review preclinical research findings on the interrelated roles of the NRF2 pathway and TRX and GSH systems, with focus given to clinical findings and their relevance in carcinogenesis and anticancer treatments.
Highly reactive aldehyde 4-hydroxynonenal (HNE) is the final product of lipid peroxidation, known as a second messenger of free radicals and a signaling molecule. It forms protein conjugates involved in pathology of various diseases. To determine cellular HNE–protein conjugates we developed indirect ELISA based on well-known, monoclonal antibody against HNE–histidine (HNE–His) adducts. The method was calibrated using HNE–albumin conjugates as standards (R2 = 0.999) and validated on human osteosarcoma cell cultures (HOS). The ELISA showed good sensitivity (8.1 pmol HNE–His/mg of protein), precision ( ± 8% intra-assay and ± 12% inter-assay) and spiking recovery ( ± 9%). The assay revealed 60-fold increase of cellular HNE–His adducts upon copper-induced lipid peroxidation of HOS. The ELISA matched HNE-immunocytochemistry of HNE-treated HOS cells and quantified the increase of cellular HNE–His conjugates in parallel to the decrease of free HNE in culture medium. The ELISA was developed as ELISA Stress for severe lipid peroxidation and ELISA Fine for studies on HNE physiology.
Normal and malignant cells of various origin differ in their sensitivity to oxidative stress. Therefore, we used normal and malignant mesenchymal cells--human osteosarcoma cells (HOS and 143B), human fibroblasts (WI38) and two primary cultures of normal human osteoblasts to test sensitivity to reactive aldehyde 4-hydroxynonenal (HNE), known as a second messenger of free radicals and a signaling molecule. Upon HNE-treatment, decrease in cell viability (by Trypan-blue), apoptosis induction (by TiterTACS TUNEL assay), HNE-protein binding (by HNE-His ELISA) were higher in malignant than in normal cells, while glutathione content was higher in normal cells. These results indicate that HNE affects the growth of malignant mesenchymal cells more than normal and that this effect was mainly related to lower glutathione concentration and higher binding of HNE to the cellular proteins. We thus assume that HNE and GSH homeostasis play an important role in the growth regulation of normal and malignant mesenchymal cells.
Oxidative stress and its end-products, such as 4-hydroxynonenal (HNE), initiate activation of the Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2 (NRF2)/Kelch Like ECH Associated Protein 1 (KEAP1) signaling pathway that plays a crucial role in the maintenance of cellular redox homeostasis. However, an involvement of 4-HNE and NRF2 in processes associated with the initiation of cancer, its progression, and response to therapy includes numerous, highly complex events. They occur through interactions between cancer and stromal cells. These events are dependent on many cell-type specific features. They start with the extent of NRF2 binding to its cytoplasmic repressor, KEAP1, and extend to the permissiveness of chromatin for transcription of Antioxidant Response Element (ARE)-containing genes that are NRF2 targets. This review will explore epigenetic molecular mechanisms of NRF2 transcription through the specific molecular anatomy of its promoter. It will explain the role of NRF2 in cancer stem cells, with respect to cancer therapy resistance. Additionally, it also discusses NRF2 involvement at the cross-roads of communication between tumor associated inflammatory and stromal cells, which is also an important factor involved in the response to therapy.
Traditional concepts of life sciences consider oxidative stress as a fundamental process of aging and various diseases including cancer, whereas traditional medicine recommends dietary intake of iron to support physiological functions of the organism. However, due to its strong pro-oxidative capacity, if not controlled well, iron can trigger harmful oxidative stress manifested eventually by toxic chain reactions of lipid peroxidation. Such effects of iron are considered to be major disadvantages of uncontrolled iron usage, although ferroptosis seems to be an important defense mechanism attenuating cancer development. Therefore, a variety of iron-containing nanoparticles were developed for experimental radio-, chemo-, and photodynamic as well as magnetic dynamic nanosystems that alter redox homeostasis in cancer cells. Moreover, studies carried over recent decades have revealed that even the end products of lipid peroxidation, represented by 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE), could have desirable effects even acting as kinds of selective anticancer substances produced by non-malignant cells for defense again invading cancer. Therefore, advanced nanotechnologies should be developed for using iron to trigger targeted lipid peroxidation as an anticancer option of integrative biomedicine.