Sarcopenia is prevalent in patients with chronic liver disease, and affected patients tend to have worse clinical outcomes and higher mortality. However, relevant analyses are limited by heterogeneity in the definition of sarcopenia and in the methodological approaches in assessing it. We reviewed several radiologic methods for sarcopenia in patients with chronic liver disease. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can measure muscle mass, but it is difficult to evaluate muscle quality using this technique. Computed tomography, known as the gold standard for diagnosing sarcopenia, enables the objective measurement of muscle quantity and quality. The third lumbar skeletal muscle index (L3 SMI) more accurately predicted the mortality of subjects than the psoas muscle index (PMI). Few studies have evaluated the sarcopenia of chronic liver disease using ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging, and more studies are needed. Unification of the measurement method and cut-off value would facilitate a more systematic and universal prognosis evaluation in patients with chronic liver disease.

We aimed to examine the relationship between abdominal computed tomography (CT)-based body composition data and both renal function decline and all-cause mortality in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD). This retrospective study comprised non-dialysis CKD patients who underwent consecutive unenhanced abdominal CT between January 2010 and December 2011. CT-based body composition was measured using semiautomated method that included visceral fat, subcutaneous fat, skeletal muscle area and density, and abdominal aortic calcium score (AAS). Sarcopenia and myosteatosis were defined by decreased skeletal muscle index (SMI) and decreased skeletal muscle density, respectively, each with specific cutoffs. Risk factors for CKD progression and survival were identified using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard regression models. Survival between groups based on myosteatosis and AAS was compared using the Kaplan–Meier curve. 149 patients (median age: 70 years) were included; 79 (53.0%) patients had sarcopenia and 112 (75.2%) had myosteatosis. The median AAS was 560.9 (interquartile range: 55.7–1478.3)/m². The prognostic factors for CKD progression were myosteatosis [odds ratio (OR) = 4.31, p = 0.013] and high AAS (OR = 1.03, p = 0.001). Skeletal muscle density [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.93, p = 0.004] or myosteatosis (HR = 4.87, p = 0.032) and high AAS (HR = 1.02, p = 0.001) were independent factors for poor survival outcomes. The presence of myosteatosis and the high burden of aortic calcium were significant factors for CKD progression and survival in patients with non-dialysis CKD.

The objective of our study is to measure perirenal fat thickness using MRI in individuals with steatotic liver disease and investigate the relationship between perirenal fat thickness and metabolic syndrome. This retrospective study included consecutive patients with steatotic liver disease who underwent magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction from October 2018 to February 2020. Among them, patients with crossed fused kidneys or who underwent nephrectomy were excluded. The metabolic abnormalities were reviewed; presence of hypertension, type 2 diabetes, abdominal circumference, triglyceride, and high-density lipoprotein. Perirenal fat was measured in four directions in both kidneys and the total sum of them was calculated. A total of 250 patients (140 males and 110 females) were included. Perirenal fat thickness showed a moderate correlation with waist circumference, creatinine, and hepatic fat fraction (all p < 0.001). Perirenal fat thickness was significantly higher in patients with metabolic syndrome than in patients without (76.8 mm vs. 65.1 mm, p = 0.004). In multivariable regression analysis, the group with high perirenal fat thickness had as significantly higher odd ratio of 2.71 compared to the low group. The perirenal fat thickness is independently associated with metabolic syndrome in patients with steatotic liver disease.

Is there a safe threshold for alcohol consumption in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease?