Gliomas are the most frequent and deadly form of human primary brain tumors. Among them, the most common and aggressive type is the high-grade glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), which rapidly grows and renders patients a very poor prognosis. Meanwhile, cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been determined in gliomas and play vital roles in driving tumor growth due to their competency in self-renewal and proliferation. Studies of gliomas have recognized CSCs via specific markers. This review comprehensively examines the current knowledge of the most significant CSCs markers in gliomas in general and in glioblastoma in particular and specifically focuses on their outlook and importance in gliomas CSCs research. We suggest that CSCs should be the superior therapeutic approach by directly targeting the markers. In addition, we highlight the association of these markers with each other in relation to their cascading pathways, and interactions with functional miRNAs, providing the role of the networks axes in glioblastoma signaling pathways.

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women. The aggressive breast cancer subtype is commonly linked to the genetic alterations in the TP53 tumor suppressor gene, predominantly the missense mutations. Robust experimental models are needed to gain better insights into these mutations’ molecular properties and implications in tumorigenesis. The generation of such models harboring the alterations is feasible with the CRISPR-based gene editing technology. Moreover, the development of new CRISPR applications, particularly DNA base and prime editing, has considerably improved the precision and versatility of gene editing. Here, we employed the prime editing tool to revert a TP53 missense C > T mutation (L194F) in a T47D luminal A breast cancer cell line. In parallel, this prime editing tool was also utilized to introduce the L194F mutation in HEK293T cells. To assess the prime editing efficiency in both cell lines, we first performed Sanger sequencing in the prime-edited cells pool and single cell-derived clones. However, the Sanger sequencing approach did not detect any base substitution in these cell lines. Next, by employing the more sensitive amplicon target sequencing, we managed to identify the expected substitution in these T47D and HEK293T cells, albeit the editing efficiency was low. In light of these findings, we discussed the technical aspects and provided suggestions for improve the prime editing workflow and efficiency for future experiments.

The present study aimed to investigate the anti‑cancer activity of imidazo[1,2‑a]pyridine 5‑7 in the A375 and WM115 melanoma and HeLa cervical cancer cell lines. The viability of cancer cells was analyzed by the MTT assay. Apoptosis was quantified by flow cytometry following staining of the cells with AnnexinV/propidium iodide (PI). The cell cycle was evaluated by flow cytometry after staining of cells with PI. The three compounds inhibited the proliferation of all cells for half maximal inhibitory concentration ranging from 9.7 to 44.6 µM following 48‑h treatment. In addition, all cancer cells were more sensitive to compound 6 compared with the other compounds. Treatment with compound 6 induced G2/M cell cycle arrest and a significant increased level of intrinsic apoptosis in all tested cells. Furthermore, compound 6 reduced the levels of phospho (p)‑protein kinase B and p‑mechanistic target of rapamycin, and increased levels of the cell cycle inhibitors p53 and p21 and of the apoptosis‑associated proteins BCL2 associated X protein and active caspase‑9. Silencing p53 in A375 melanoma cells reduced compound 6‑induced apoptosis, which suggested that compound 6 may induce p53‑partially mediated apoptosis. These results demonstrated that imidazo[1,2‑a]pyridines 5‑7 are potential effective compounds in the treatment of melanoma and cervical cancers.

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is a hypervascular tumor that is characterized by bi-allelic inactivation of the VHL tumor suppressor gene and mTOR signalling pathway hyperactivation. The pro-angiogenic factor PDGFB, a transcriptional target of super enhancer-driven KLF6, can activate the mTORC1 signalling pathway in ccRCC. However, the detailed mechanisms of PDGFB-mediated mTORC1 activation in ccRCC have remained elusive. Here, we investigated whether ccRCC cells are able to secrete PDGFB into the extracellular milieu and stimulate mTORC1 signalling activity. We found that ccRCC cells secreted PDGFB extracellularly, and by utilizing KLF6- and PDGFB-engineered ccRCC cells, we showed that the level of PDGFB secretion was positively correlated with the expression of intracellular KLF6 and PDGFB. Moreover, the reintroduction of either KLF6 or PDGFB was able to sustain mTORC1 signalling activity in KLF6-targeted ccRCC cells. We further demonstrated that conditioned media of PDGFB-overexpressing ccRCC cells was able to re-activate mTORC1 activity in KLF6-targeted cells. In conclusion, cancer cell-derived PDGFB can mediate mTORC1 signalling pathway activation in ccRCC, further consolidating the link between the KLF6-PDGFB axis and the mTORC1 signalling pathway activity in ccRCC.