Background: Femoral shaft fractures (FSFs) are a frequent injury in traumatology for which intramedullary nailing (IMN) is considered the gold standard treatment. Nonunion (NU) is one of the most frequent complications in FSF treated with IMN, with a percentage from 1.1% to 14%. Plate augmentation (PA), the addition of a compression plate and screws, with or without bone graft has been described as an effective option for the treatment of NU, improving the biomechanical conditions at the fracture site. The aim of this review was to analyze the literature relating to the use of PA in NU after IMN in FSFs to assess the efficacy of the technique. Methods: An electronic search on PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science was conducted to search for all studies concerning PA of femoral shaft NUs after IMN. Results: Twenty-four studies were included in the review comprising a total of 502 patients with a mean age of 39.5 years. Of these, 200 hundred patients had atrophic pseudoarthrosis and 123 had hypertrophic pseudoarthrosis, while in 179, the type of pseudoarthrosis was not reported. The most frequently used plate for PA was the dynamic compression plate (DCP); in 87.1% of the cases, the authors added a bone graft to the plate fixation. In 98.0% of the patients, a complete bone union was achieved in a mean time of 5.8 ± 2.12 months. Conclusion: The patients treated with PA included in this review showed a good rate of consolidation in the femoral shaft NUs, with good functional recovery and a low incidence of complications.

Background and Objectives: The treatment of end-stage ankle osteoarthritis (OA) and associated hindfoot deformities remains a major challenge for orthopedic surgeons. Numerous techniques and surgical approaches have been proposed for tibiotalar (TT) and tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis, from arthroscopic to open, as well as numerous devices proposed for internal fixation (retrograde intramedullary nails, cannulated screws, and plating systems). The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the results, with at least 18 months of follow-up, with Silverback^TM TT/TTC Plating System Paragon28 in a group of 20 patients with severe OA and hindfoot deformities (mainly secondary post-traumatic OA). Materials and Methods: The demographic characteristics and past medical history of the patients were collected and analyzed to identify the cause of the pathology. The degree of OA and deformity were quantified based on foot and ankle weight-bearing radiography and CT examination. Pre- and post-operative clinical and functional scores (ROM, VAS, AOFAS, FFI, and SF-36) and radiographic parameters (anterior distal tibial angle, tibiotalar angle, coronal tibiotalar angle, and hindfoot alignment angle) were evaluated. Results: All of the patients showed clinical and radiographic fusion at an average of 14 weeks (range 12–48), with improvement in pain and functional scores, without major surgical complications and/or infections. Conclusions: Despite the limitations of our study, the results with this new plating system showed good results in terms of bone consolidation, post-operative complications, and improvement of pain and quality of life in patients with severe OA and deformities of the ankle and hindfoot.

Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris (ARMD) is one of the most frequent complications after Total Hip Replacement (THR) and often a cause of surgical revision. This is true especially for implants with Metal-on-Metal (MoM) and Large Diameter Heads (LDHs), which are frequently used to improve stability and reduce the risk of dislocation. However, ARMD is not exclusive to MoM replacement, as it can also occur in other implants such Ceramic-on-Ceramic (CoC), Metal-on-Polyethylene (MoP), and Ceramic-on-Polyethylene (CoP). In these non-MoM implants, ARMD is not caused by the tribo-corrosion between bearing surfaces but, rather, by the fretting at the interface between neck and stem of dissimilar metals. A case of a severe ARMD that happened to a 73-year-old female patient with CoC bearing THR at the right hip is presented in this case report. In this case, the ARMD was misdiagnosed for over a year, resulting in the development of a massive pseudotumor. The treatment of choice was a two-stage revision with the implant of a hip megaprosthesis. After more than 2 years of follow-up, complete recovery of hip Range of Motion (ROM) and normalization of chromium and cobalt levels in blood and urine were achieved. Despite the relatively short follow-up period, this can be considered a successful treatment of a major and misdiagnosed ARMD in a non-MoM hip replacement.

Background: The primary method employed worldwide for the treatment of scaphoid fractures is screw fixation. However, in unstable and comminuted fractures, percutaneous fixation could produce complications due to technical challenges, such as improper axis positioning, inaccurate screw length measurement, intra-articular screw penetration, and impingement. Alternative open approaches for the surgical management of scaphoid fractures have been proposed, and in recent years, a new specific volar locking plate for the treatment of scaphoid fractures has been developed. This study aims to present the outcomes of this technique applied to 44 patients with unstable and comminuted fractures of the scaphoid. Aims: The purpose of the study is to verify the effectiveness of the volar plate in the treatment of comminuted scaphoid fractures and the necessity for plate removal when consolidation has occurred. Methods: Between January 2021 and March 2023, a specific volar locking plate for the treatment of scaphoid fractures was used in 44 patients. A retrospective study was conducted involving all patients, consisting of continuous clinical and radiographic assessments, functional evaluations (using QuickDASH and MHQ), and patient satisfaction surveys. Results: All patients achieved clinical and radiographic recovery. However, the plate can impinge with nearby structures and should be removed once the fracture is consolidated. After plate removal, further improvement in range of motion was observed. Conclusion: The plate and screws system is a viable and appropriate method of osteosynthesis in the treatment of unstable and comminuted recent fractures occurring in the middle third of the carpal scaphoid.

Background: Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis affects up to 25% of women and 8% of men over 70 years of age, significantly compromising their activities of daily living. With the rapid growth of the elderly population globally and their specific clinical needs, understanding optimal surgical treatment for this age group is crucial. This systematic review compares trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) versus dual-mobility prosthesis for treating thumb CMC arthritis in elderly patients over 70 years old. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to August 2025. Studies that directly compared both techniques were included, with subgroup analyses performed for elderly patients over 70 years of age when data were available. Primary outcomes included pain relief, functional improvement, grip and pinch strength, complications, and patient satisfaction. Results: Five studies met the inclusion criteria for direct comparison of both techniques, encompassing 313 patients (324 thumbs). While none exclusively focused on patients over 70, elderly patients represented 25–41% of study populations. Due to the absence of age-stratified data in the original studies, our analysis encompasses all age groups with specific considerations for elderly patients where identifiable. Dual-mobility prostheses demonstrated faster pain relief and earlier functional improvement, particularly within the first 3–6 months postoperatively. Prostheses consistently provided superior grip and pinch strength outcomes throughout follow-up periods. Both procedures effectively preserved thumb function, but prostheses better maintained thumb length and metacarpophalangeal stability. While complication rates were comparable, LRTI complications were typically minor and self-limiting, whereas prosthesis complications, though rare, could potentially require revision surgery. Longer-term follow-up data (>3 years) remain limited, particularly regarding implant degradation and adverse local tissue reactions. Conclusions: Both procedures effectively treat thumb CMC arthritis in elderly patients, with distinct advantages. Dual-mobility prostheses offer faster recovery, enhanced strength, and better thumb length preservation, making them potentially advantageous for elderly patients prioritizing rapid functional recovery. Trapeziectomy with LRTI provides reliable long-term pain relief with fewer serious complications, making it suitable for patients with poor bone quality or significant comorbidities. Treatment selection should be individualized based on patient characteristics, functional demands, and surgeon expertise. Future research specifically focusing on elderly populations with longer follow-up periods (>5 years) is critically needed to provide stronger evidence for this growing demographic and to better understand long-term implant performance.

Background: Wrist arthritis significantly impacts the quality of life in elderly populations. While total wrist arthroplasty and wrist arthrodesis are established treatments, partial resurfacing procedures are emerging as a solution offering advantages for patients over 70 years of age. Objective: To systematically evaluate the efficacy, safety, and functional outcomes of radial versus carpal resurfacing procedures for the management of wrist arthritis in patients over 70 years of age. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted for studies published from these databases’ inception to May 2025. Studies reporting the outcomes of either radial or carpal resurfacing in patients ≥70 years of age with wrist arthritis were included. Primary outcomes were pain reduction, functional improvement, and complication rates. Results: Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. Both carpal and radial resurfacing provided pain relief, with mean VAS scores ranging from 0 to 3.8 across studies and DASH scores ranging from 13 to 59 points, while carpal resurfacing showed better preservation of range of motion, with flexion/extension arcs of 27–65° compared to 22–46° for radial implants. Complication rates were comparable, though implant loosening was uncommon with both radial and carpal resurfacing. Both procedures demonstrated satisfactory patient-reported outcomes at midterm follow-up (median: 32 months; range: 6–84 months). Conclusion: In patients over 70 years of age with wrist arthritis, both radial and carpal resurfacing appear to be viable options with distinct advantages. Radial resurfacing may be preferred for patients with previous distal radius fractures, while carpal resurfacing offers better motion preservation and is indicated in SLAC and SNAC wrists. Patient selection should consider specific arthritis patterns, activity requirements, and comorbidities. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate durability beyond 5–10 years in this population.